A driver has avoided being jailed after he deliberately crashed into a cyclist because the man 'cycled over a bridge'.
Muir David Taylor, 65, 'started going mental' and swerved into the rider, knocking the man into a busy road.
He then drove off, leaving the victim lying injured on the floor.
Taylor appeared at Plymouth Crown Court, Devon, for sentence having pleaded guilty to dangerous driving.
Prosecuting the case, Emily Cook described how on November 6 last year the victim was cycling behind Taylor on the Tamar Bridge when Taylor took exception to him, Cornwall Live reports.
Taylor slowed down so the cyclist had to stop and the pair exchanged words.
After leaving the bridge Taylor should have turned right but instead, without indicating, swerved left across two lanes of traffic to get in front of the rider.
The cyclist pulled up and Taylor told him not to cycle on the bridge with witnesses describing him as 'going mental'.
Taylor then deliberately drove into the cyclist, knocking him over and into a live lane of traffic.
He then accelerated away but witnesses were able to identify his vehicle to police and Taylor was traced and arrested.
The victim was lucky to only suffer minor injuries but has been left shaken by the ordeal.
Sentencing Taylor, Judge Robert Linford said: “You lost your temper and at some point your vehicle hit a cyclist. This was extremely dangerous driving because you lost your temper.
“That said this is the only time you’ve done anything wrong in your entire life and you have expressed an appropriate level of remorse.
“I note the problems that beset your life prior to this incident.”
Taylor was given a 12 month community order consisting of a mental health treatment requirement and a rehabilitation activity requirement. He was also banned from driving for 12 months.
Add new comment
69 comments
That he was going through problems in his life prior to the incident should be no reason whatsoever to giving him a slap on the wrists.
All this does is give every psychopath in a car an easy excuse to explain their utterly shite driving.
If the judges cannot give appropriate punishments they might be in the wrong job.
Quite. There are two things that must be applied here.
The former is independent of sympathy and must be totally objective. The latter is where you can play to teh gallery to show what a kind-hearted judge you are.
Speechless!
Should be a custodial sentence just for the hit and run aspect. That it was completely intentional should mean a lifetime driving ban - he does not have the emotional composure to not endanger others.
Dangerous driving with intent to cause injury, should carry mandatory prison sentence. Minimum 1 yr prison sentence, 5yr driving ban to start after prison release. Then an extended driving test.
Why should someone who has deliberately hit another road user with a vehicle because of their inability to control their temper ever be allowed to drive again?
If someone shoots a stranger with a shotgun they are never allowed to hold a shotgun license again - so why should we as a society accept a lower punishment just because the weapon of choice has four wheels.?
OMFG. I despair of some of our judges. This moron assaults someone with a deadly weapon and pushes him into a main road with a high rate of traffic and he gets off without any kind of custodial sentence. If he had knocked a pedestrian into the road with a baseball bat would the judge have been as lenient?
I despair of some of our judges
Agreed. Judge Linford is highly unlikely to be a cyclist.
Using a heavy vehicle as a weapon should ALWAYS lead to prison sentences. And long ones at that.
Pages