A video of a driver overtaking an indicating cyclist ahead of a tight bend before storming out of his car to confront the rider has gone viral on Twitter, being viewed more than three million times since yesterday.
In a twist to the scene the motorist's vehicle rolled away after the man forgot to apply the handbrake, prompting the cyclist to warn, "your car's running away, careful!" and the driver to run back to stop the vehicle before continuing his rant.
> Near Miss of the Day 844: Driver insists cyclists who film motorists are asking to be hit
The clip was shared on social media by the 'Northfield cyclist' account who revealed the driving on show was "only worthy of a 'warning letter sent for inconsiderate driving' from Warwickshire Police".
"I was indicating to turn right approx 50 yards before turn = brake checked and two very, very angry people," they explained.
The video appears to be filmed on Spring Lane near the M24 in Solihull, just south of Birmingham and shows the cyclist riding north at the moment they indicate to turn right.
Seemingly ignoring the signal the driver overtakes the rider who then waves his arm in disgust at the manoeuvere approaching a turn. In reply, the driver of the Peugeot then twice brake checks the cyclist before coming to a stop and shouting, "what's up with you you t**t?"
While the rider answers, "you don't overtake while I'm indicating to turn right please", the driver storms out of the vehicle before comically running back after being told his car's running away.
Handbrake safely applied the confrontation continued, the driver asking "what on earth is up with you, man?"
With one more brake check the motorist leaves the scene as a passer by checks the cyclist is okay.
Earlier this month we shared the 842nd of our Near Miss of the Day series highlighting dangerous driving on Britain's roads, in which a passenger jumped out of a car to remonstrate with a cyclist — after the driver cut a corner and almost hit him.
"Listen now, I saw you, she wasn't cutting [the corner]," the passenger, now standing in the road in front of the cyclist, suggested.
"What do you mean, she wasn't cutting the corner?" came the baffled reply.
Then, delivered with a startling irony, the woman shouted at the cyclist to "get off the road" before he's on the receiving end of yet more dodgy driving.
After the rider, understandably, asked why he was the recipient of a verbal lashing after a motorist cut the corner of a junction, almost hitting him, the protective passenger replied: "Because you're standing still there and there's other traffic, and you'll cause an accident."
Add new comment
68 comments
The motorist probably passed his driving test 40 years ago and in that time there's been no retest or refresher leading to bad habits and entitlement.
McHackety, save your ageist claptrap for elswhere, you don't become 'entitled' just because you are older. Anyway, most of the people who cut me up are youngsters driving cheap hatchbacks way too fast.
Hmm, I'm in my 60s, and it seems the most argumentative drivers who decide that as a cyclist you are clearly in the wrong despite the facts (as opposed to the ones that try and lamp you one) are older than me.
Ah, a PPW.
Always think twice about poking narcissists, they don't like it up 'em. Particularly if they're having to drive a shitty Peugeot rather than something a little more aspirational. Although I did freak one out once by calling him by his first name, deduced from the plate.
For example, it looks tiny-dicked Andrew Tate is under the impression he's James Bond, clearly has a thing for "SPY" plates BBC News - Romanian police seize luxury cars from Andrew Tate's property
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-64273973
Can we stop demonising the poorly-endowed, please?
WeThey already have enough onourtheir plate.Enough for who?
My observation is while agreeing with others that the driver should have anticipated that a cyclist in the centre of their lane while indicating an intention to turn right, they were likely to veer closer to the centre line as they approached the junction, and would therefore create a dangerous close pass if that manoeuvre was made. Poor driving skills - lack of anticipation leading to driving without due care.
Classic driver unable to cope with a wave - HWC do not overtake approaching a junction. That cyclist was not overly early in signalling, and interesting that the idea of waiting was so repugnant that they are prepared to delay themselves and other road users far longer to make their point. This sort of behaviour should be getting extra sanctions not let off with a shrug.
I would have gone for a complaint of assault - note the rider steps back when confronted with a man approaching him with clenched fists - expecting to be hit is assault, it does not require contact.
Also there was a public order offence with the swearing - how many times have we heard that police have to deal with all offences when videos are submitted?
Then the driver just couldn't let it go, clearly giving hard consideration to following the cyclist down the country lane.
The road is off the A3400, near the M42 (not M24!), the incident just after the 50mph road signs - and a notable Baptist Church and footpath that leads to an obelisk that you can see from the M40 just before the Henley turn off.
Also there was a public order offence with the swearing
The only application of the swearing dodge which the police bother with is the 'we can't do anything about the close pass because of the swearing' one. It doesn't count if the driver swears at the cyclist because the police view that as 'fair comment'
It seems obvious that many drivers have an incredibly fragile ego, and any questioning of their ability to drive has to be met with potential violence. This driver must have been checking for a response from the cyclist, otherwise he'd never have seen the cyclist gesticulate in the mirror, while approaching a turning and a bend.
Yet again, a driver overtakes dangerously, with a cyclist indicating right, approaching a turning and a sharp bend, because they don't have time to wait, then they stop, get out of their car and have an argument. There are so many cases of this, with the drivers being identifiable, that I think some student of transport or pyschology or both, should track them down and find out what was going through their minds when they did it. Then find out if they've realised how stupid they were, especially this one; stopping without putting the handbrake on, classic. He didn't even thank the cyclist for saving his car.
I do wonder how people like this guy react when they get a warning or points on their licence? Do they realise their behaviour and driving has been poor? Do they change at all?
Do they change at all?
Not to an 'advice letter' they don't
the clenched right fist ready for a fight....there are some psycho car drivers out there! BTW, would have loved to see his car roll on to that bend and get smashed to f*ck by an HGV caning it round the corner
What a miserable old fekker. He came close to an elbow through the chin.
Or. He may have a dementia related illness setting in.
Tricky one to call.
Should be more than a warning letter due to the excessive aggression. I do not want drivers to respond with aggression to any polite discussion or criticism of their lack of consideration of others.
Id agree though remind a letter is still considered a success it has to pass the same evidential standard as a NIP just the outcome punishment if you like for is lower than points and a fine, though if some forces hand them out for lesser stuff than this, theres a clear inconsistency developing.
but it maybe due to variety of things in play, we havent seen the full clip, and Im surprised for instance we havent mentioned the case this week where a road rage thug escaped jail because the judge (who seems an interesting character) decided the prisons were too full https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/labour-slams-prison-cell-cuts-289...
Im sure the courts are still backlogged so prosecutions maybe being saved for serious harm cases
Not to this level, but I was punish passed last night for daring to slow a car from approaching the red lights 4 seconds sooner. As I was sat behind I noticed the passenger window was down and some ranting which the camera picked up some of it as "should be on the pavement". I raised that in my online ticket to WMP which I hope proves the act was deliberate rather then a smidsy if they bother to do anything about it.
Should have lamped the miserable twat.
Should've waited a little longer before telling him the car was rolling away.
I would have been tempted not to tell him at all.
I would have resisted that temptation - I'd a let it roll far, far away!
.
I'd've tried to engage him in in conversation so that he didn't notice until too late. Stupid people deserve stupid prizes.
I considered that too, but could result in a crash and thus the serious injury or death of someone completely unlrelated to the incident. Not very ethical really.
Sometimes yes but on this occasion the other traffic was stationary or moving slowly so only a tiny fender bender and anyone driving safely would have plenty of time to react anyway.
I'm probably in a minority but whenever I pass a crash I just think it means two less idiots on the road who could have killed a cyclist or pedestrian instead and maybe the increased insurance cost might make them a bit more careful in future.
I suppose. Northfield cyclist is the better man here by a country mile.
inadequate police response to multiple offences clearly evidenced - the warning letter will be torn up.
I suggested that in the comments on Twitter and got this slightly over the top response...
https://twitter.com/Sniffer1967/status/1614017256987717632?s=20&t=zeVDmP...
Some people are so absorbed into carbrain culture that they can't appreciate that the person who brings heavy machinery into a public place is responsible for that machinery and the safety of other people around it.
Obviously the decent thing to warn the driver that their car was rolling away, if only for the safety of other road users. But personally, I think I'd have waited just a few seconds more to be absolutely sure it was moving. Wouldn't want to cause undue alarm.
Maybe give it a push too, just to check your hypothesis and avoid a false positive?
Pages