Update, 09/09/2023: The driver of a 4x4 who close passed a cyclist on a country lane before reversing back down the road towards him, hitting a dog in the process, has escaped punishment after North Yorkshire Police “carefully considered” footage of the shocking incident. Instead, the motorist was given road safety advice from officers “in order to prevent further incidents”, while the cyclist was allegedly advised “not to shout in future”.
In the immediate aftermath of the incident (which can be viewed below, and in our original Near Miss of the Day feature at the bottom of this update), the police told road.cc reader Peter that “no traffic offences were committed” and that the cyclist had contributed to the driver’s decision to reverse by shouting “watch out!” following the close pass, an act the officer said constituted ‘road rage’.
Following that rather unsatisfactory verdict, Peter lodged a complaint with the North Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner, who conducted a review into the incident. According to the chief inspector, the review concluded that “the initial decision was wrong and that an investigation is in fact required.”
However, Peter has since told road.cc that “the new investigation ended disappointingly in the same place as the initial peremptory response”.
According to Peter, the blame for the motorist’s collision with the dog was pitted on the driver of the quad bike (and presumably the dog’s owner), who was found to have been driving “too fast” at the time of the incident, as well as failing to have properly secured the dog or registered his vehicle. North Yorkshire Police told road.cc that the quad bike rider has not been identified, and that it is currently unclear what happened to the dog.
Peter says that he was told by phone that no blame was placed on the 4x4 driver, with the officer allegedly telling the cyclist that the motorist was reversing because he “probably just wanted to speak” to him.
Meanwhile, Peter claims that he was also “advised not to shout in future” during similar incidents.
A spokesperson for North Yorkshire Police told road.cc: “Officers carefully considered the video footage of the incident, and spoke to the driver of the Kuga and the cyclist.
“However, despite extensive enquiries, the rider of the quad bike has not been identified, and it is not known what happened to the dog seen in the video.
“The driver of the Kuga was given advice about road safety in order to prevent further incidents.
“The safety of all road users is a priority for North Yorkshire Police. We urge anyone who witnesses driving offences on our roads to contact us. Footage from a dashcam, CCTV or a passenger’s mobile phone can be sent to us – search for ‘Op Snap’ on our website.”
You can read the original Near Miss of the Day article below:
This is one of the most shocking submissions we have had to our Near Miss of the Day series, with the driver of a 4x4 making a close pass at a cyclist on a country lane and, when the rider remonstrated, reversing back down the road towards him, forcing a quadbike rider to swerve and running over a dog that had been travelling on it.
Incredibly, North Yorkshire Police decided not to act on the footage, citing among other things that the cyclist had contributed towards the sequence events by shouting at the driver to “watch out!” The cyclist, road.cc reader Peter, has now raised a complaint with the North Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner.
The incident happened on the morning of Tuesday 5 July 2022 on Orcaber Lane near Austwick, in the south west corner of the Yorkshire Dales National Park. The incident starts at 1 minute 7 seconds into this video, shot from a rear-facing camera.
“I reported this incident to North Yorkshire Police,” Peter told us. “Their response, in a telephone call, was ‘no traffic offences were committed’ and that they would take no action.
“Briefly, they described my shouting ‘watch out’ as an oncoming wide SUV passed me at a speed I felt was too fast for a single-track country lane as ‘road rage’ and a contributory factor in the driver then reversing at speed towards me.
“I was saved from the encounter I feared by his running over a dog that fell from a quad bike that he forced off the road.”
Reversing a vehicle is covered by Rules 200-203 of the Highway Code.
Rule 202 says, among other things, that drivers should:
Look carefully before you start reversing. You should … check there are no pedestrians (particularly children), cyclists, other road users or obstructions in the road behind you … reverse slowly …
Rule 203 says:
You MUST NOT reverse your vehicle further than necessary.
“Given the police response, I am contacting the Police and Crime Commissioner with my concerns that the response indicates a worrying lack of concern with improving safety for vulnerable road users,” Peter continued.
“I think that my intuition that this driver was dangerous when he passed me was vindicated by his subsequent dangerous behaviour. I had expected that he would at least receive a warning from the police that this kind of behaviour is not acceptable.”
He added: “I pointed out to the PCC that the York and North Yorkshire Road Safety Partnership Safer Roads Strategy 2021-26 states that ‘Pedal cyclists account for a high and increasing proportion of all KSIs over the last five years’.”
As for the dog – which we suspect from the footage may be a working border collie given the prevalence of sheep farming in the area – Peter told us: “It seemed immobile but the two drivers didn’t seem to want to speak with me so I left without knowing whether it was dead or alive.”
Here’s the footage from his front-facing camera:
> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?
Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.
If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.
If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).
Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.
> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling
Add new comment
202 comments
Mark Hodson:
Where to even begin...
I hope the PCC take an interest, but I'm pretty sure there have been other incidents on NMotD which have been escalated to the local PCC, and the PCC response was essentially "It's not my job to tell the Police how to do their job". Which left me rather confused as to what the PCC's job is.
The role is a straw man to give an impression of democratic/ civic oversight of the police force. Nothing else.
Just checking I've understood. Shouting "Watch out!" is road rage, but stopping, and then reversing at high speed, interrupting your journey to remonstrate, is perfectly acceptable driving and does not reflect any display of loss of control, regardless of whether or not any carnage being caused in its wake?
To be honest I can't bring myself to watch the footage, but this is daily life as a cyclist. Perhaps someone would care to submit this for an Ashley Analysis while we are on and he can explain how badly the cyclist read the road?
They should have been using the bridleway (if above a certain age).
Surely those who have not yet realised that the main single enemy of cyclists is The Police must now be getting the message?! The decision is already made before they even receive evidence from a cyclist that 'we're not going to do anything'- they then make up anything, no matter how stupid, to justify to their tiny minds that decision. The police are serious ********
What a joke the comments from the police are in that instance.
The motorist deliberately drove their car in reverse at speed towards a vulnerable road user. That's road rage as a minimum.
Had the driver not hit the dog, what was their end game? Were they just going to get close to the cyclist then stop and have a polite word with them? Or was it their intent to drive into the cyclist and knock them off their bike?
I hope that forwarding this to the PCC comes back with some action in respect of the incident.
That is shocking a real WTF. I watched the front view first and thought that seemed a lot further up the road before he turned and saw the car,Then i watched the rear i can't believe how far he reversed. I suspect they might have known each other (driver /4x4) possibly both work on the same farm.
Road rage excuse is crap.
Oh that's rubbish, that poor dog. North Yorkshire Police should hang their heads in shame.
North Yorkshire Police should hang their heads in shame
Except they won't; this is all in a Day's Work at Perverting the Course of Justice to them. Complaining to the PCC is doomed to failure after an unconscionably long delay, if it's anything like Lancashire.
Who in their right mind reverses at speed down a road as narrow as that?
‘no traffic offences were committed’
Pretty high bar for an offence then.
At speed... for a considerable distance!
I believe it would be someone who is actually enacting road rage.
Watch the video again and note how the quad rider was forced entirely off the road to avoid a very serious collision. See how far past the MPV they travel before both vehicles stop. Had that been a big verge or ditch I suspect the Police would have been forced to investigate.
To be fair, the quad was not hanging around. The only road user here who used the road correctly was the cyclist.
Institutionally anti cyclist
The police response on this is absolutely astonishing. That reversing manoeuvre was reckless and unjustified. Shouting 'watch out' in no way constitutes road rage. It's akin to a driver sounding their horn, which would have been appropriate under the circumstances had it been another car, rather than a bike.
So, the words "Watch Out" are pretty much being used in the same context as "You now have a gateway to cause (possible) bodily harm to me, with no repercussion!"
"Give him it" - we all know how that particular phrase ended up for a few people.
Well, I'm lost for words with this one...
Off duty/ex police officer driving the car perhaps??
I'm about to send in my footage that WMP appear to have failled to act on where I obviously caused the incident by vocalising my surprise the the very likely chance of a collision being caused by the van driver overtaking into oncoming traffic. Does shouting "Whoa!" count as road rage?
Not sure if others have had any luck or if WMP don't send updates but I've submitted many videos and never got a response.
Correct response: fine, prosecute the driver, and prosecute me for road rage. Good luck with that sticking!
Pages