Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Sunday Times names and shames cyclists racking up miles on Strava

Newspaper flags up rides being undertaken as part of monthly mileage challenge

The Sunday Times has today named and shamed UK cyclists who have been sharing details of their rides on Strava, including one who rode an average of 100 miles a day in the past week – even though government rules on outdoor exercise undertaken during the lockdown do not specify a time or distance limit.

In its article, the newspaper singles out a challenge on Strava for cyclists to ride 1,250 kilometres (777 miles) during a calendar month, and adds that 30,000 riders in the UK have signed up to it, 100 of them averaging rides of 50 miles each day between 1-9 April.

While it acknowledges that the government has set no limit on the amount of daily exercise that should be undertaken, it highlights recent comments by cabinet minister Michael Gove.

Speaking earlier this month to the BBC’s Andrew Marr, he said: “I would have thought for most people a walk of up to an hour, a run of 30 minutes or a cycle ride of between that, depending on their level of fitness, is appropriate.”

However, there is no such stipulation in the government’s own emergency legislation, and while British Cycling and Cycling UK have both urged people to ride responsibly and limit their activities to avoid a total ban on riding being brought in, the letter of the law suggests no-one riding 100 miles or so is actually breaking it.

The article highlighted one rider on Strava who had posted – or, in the newspaper’s words. “boasted of” riding 700 miles in seven days at the start of the month, and another who had logged a ride of 162 miles lasting almost eight hours from Manchester to Shropshire.

The newspaper did accept that many riders appeared to be riding loops close to where they live, and while it did not mention Zwift, the likelihood is that many people will be riding on that or other virtual platforms from home while the lockdown continues.

The article is published on a weekend when North Yorkshire Police & Crime Commissioner Julia Mulligan described cyclists as a “real worry” in the current environment, although she subsequently clarified that riders in the area were not doing anything wrong, but had been “causing a bit of tension” by riding through villages.

> Cyclists ‘a real worry’ says North Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner – before conceding they aren't actually doing anything wrong

The newspaper’s article today was also accompanied by a photo of cyclists riding on Box Hill in Surrey – even though it is closed to all traffic, including bicycles, for the Easter weekend.

The photo is similar to one used by siter paper The Times last week, which due to foreshortening caused by the use of a telephoto lens and shooting the cyclists head-one appeared to give the impression they were riding as a group.

> Times latest newspaper accused of trying to shame cyclists with dodgy telephoto pics

In fact, as an image shot by one of the cyclists in that very group showed, the cyclists – who were riding either alone, or with another member of their household – were spaced well apart.<ul>

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

97 comments

Avatar
Simon E replied to demondig | 4 years ago
1 like

.

Avatar
demondig replied to Simon E | 4 years ago
1 like

There's no frothing at the mouth here. Nor any outrage. Nor any rocks being thrown. Nor any condemnation of anyone. It's just an interesting question how far there are ethical considerations weighing against doing long rides in the current environment, that are independent of the extent to which any particular one of those rides might lead to any immediate harms. It's possible, after all, to consider moral issues calmly: don't take the suggestion that there might be reasons against acting in a certain way as itself amounting to a vilification of that course of action! I'm inclined to think that there are reasons weighing against doing long rides, which is why I'm not myself doing any - in the normal run of events I'd be doing a lot of long rides myself around now, but I haven't been out in some weeks - but these are complex questions.    

Avatar
Simon E replied to demondig | 4 years ago
0 likes

demondig wrote:

I'm inclined to think that there are reasons weighing against doing long rides, which is why I'm not myself doing any - in the normal run of events I'd be doing a lot of long rides myself around now, but I haven't been out in some weeks - but these are complex questions.    

I think your choice is very reasonable. I've had similar thoughts myself, not only about how far to ride in the current situation but throughout my adult life about rock climbing, riding powerful motorbikes and other dangerous activities. I'm not sure it's complex but it's certainly individual.

What I take issue with is some people taking it upon themselves to decide what everyone else should or should not do and telling them so. When those people are journalists I think they are abusing their privileged position. I think that there are far more important questions that are not being asked while cyclists as a collective (which we aren't) are being scapegoated once more.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to Simon E | 4 years ago
2 likes

I don't quite know what I think about those out cycling long-distances. There's a basis for thinking they maybe shouldn't be doing that. I'm not a cyclist currently, I'm barely a 'go-outside-ist' (and I have no garden or balcony, hence am in an even worse mood than usual).

But I certainly think the country has much bigger problems to worry about than a few guys on Strava. I feel it's a distraction activity by a media that continues to fail to do its real job, just as it failed to give this the attention it merited back not just in early March, when it was clear they should be stopping or restricting travel to northern Italy or even the whole of Europe, but right back to January, when it was obvious this was going to arrive here at some point from China.

I reckon this sort of thing is partly projection of a guilty-concience by our useless media.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to fpdave100 | 4 years ago
10 likes

"...and i think we should do our bit so I am limiting my rides to less than 2 hours - and only 3 times a week anyway."

And you'll be pissing in the wind, because those who subscribe to that reductive logic will never be satisfied until you share their misery.

Two hours? On a bike? Multiple times per week? You're up against people who have never conceived of such excess in their lives and think nothing of driving under a mile to the shops every day.

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... replied to Sriracha | 4 years ago
2 likes

I have a neighbour who drives to the shop which can be seen from his house. And yes, he is fat.

Avatar
philtregear replied to fpdave100 | 4 years ago
0 likes

You are right. Well done

Avatar
ktache | 4 years ago
2 likes

Here's another hate filled article from the Guardian.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/13/pop-up-bike-lanes-help-wit...

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to ktache | 4 years ago
3 likes

Am I missing something? Perhaps sarcasm that's too subtle for me.

Thanks for the link, though. There is an opportunity to reallocate roadspace temporarily, and keep it that way if people like it.

Avatar
ktache replied to HarrogateSpa | 4 years ago
1 like

Sorry Harrogate xxxxx Spa, somebody had found it as hate filled as some of the right wing nasties out there earlier in the weekend.  Referencing that...

Spewing it's hate filled communistic bile...

How's the recent dry weather made the Stray look?

Down in the now drought afflicted South, all of my formally impassable mudpits of bridleways are now incredibly dry, the horse hoofprints are now set in dry mud, almost concrete like, much like the ruts were during the beast from the east, even bits of the Thames that had flooded fields are drying out.

Avatar
HarrogateSpa replied to ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

The Stray is dry again.

It's only one bit - West Park Stray - where the UCI trucks and stalls were. Much of the grass there has been killed off. It'll recover one day!

Avatar
Sriracha | 4 years ago
7 likes

Just been out for 12 miles. Beautiful countryside, really lifts the spirits. Saw about 20 other cyclists. Saw at least 400+ cars. The cyclists were all out with a "reasonable excuse" as defined in law, exercise, by default. The motorists? Why does the Times not report on all the motor traffic?

Avatar
ktache replied to Sriracha | 4 years ago
7 likes

I saw quite a bit of "essential" car journeys yesterday.  Odd when even supermarkets were closed.  I even saw a "vital" easter egg delivery.

Avatar
bikeman01 replied to ktache | 4 years ago
0 likes

ktache wrote:

I saw quite a bit of "essential" car journeys yesterday.  Odd when even supermarkets were closed.  I even saw a "vital" easter egg delivery.

The police seem to have trouble seeing these 'essential' car journeys. Maybe because they're too busy flying drones and goose stepping around the parks.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to bikeman01 | 4 years ago
2 likes

It's not the police harassing cyclists, and neither would I want them mounting roadblocks to interrogate motorists. It's the likes of the Sunday Times - why are they so obsessed with cyclists yet they don't publish any telephoto pics of motorists? If their agenda was unnecessary excursions beyond the home then I'd expect some variety to their coverage. If anything, there can be an assumption that cyclists are legitimately taking exercise, something motorists can not claim. So I'm guessing their agenda is just anti-cyclist.

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... replied to ktache | 4 years ago
1 like

The fuckwit neighbours had their 'vital' builder down all weekend, constructing their 'vital' outbuilding. The fuckwit showed no signs of socially distancing from the builder, nor his mates, who came down for a nosey.

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... replied to Sriracha | 4 years ago
2 likes

We were only discussing this today whilst on our daily walk. At the beginning of the lockdown, the roads were definately quieter. But I think people are getting bored, the novelty has worn off, the 'me me me' snowflake brigade are thinking "I will not do what you instruct me".

We live on a main A road. I was painting the house windows on Good Friday. The traffic was astonishing, just like a normal day. Easter Sunday was unbelievable. After a quiet start, it was busy as fuck, considering all the supermarkets and everywhere else were closed, where were all these motorists going on their 'essential' journeys? Even the retarded Fuckwit neighbours were in, out, in, out, in, out, all day, as usual.

Avatar
ktache replied to Rik Mayals underpants | 4 years ago
0 likes

When out today for my mandated daily exercise I saw one definite, and with the next vehicle, a very probable learner driver being given an informal lesson by their parent.  Essential journey?

Avatar
Rik Mayals unde... replied to ktache | 4 years ago
0 likes

Yeah I've seen a few learner drivers out. Ridiculous.

Avatar
philtregear | 4 years ago
3 likes

I read the ST  article and it was amusing to see strava users hoisted by their own peotard. The more serious point, obfuscated by the author of this piece, is how much civic responsibility should cyclists be taking on in the current climate. Road cc is quick to take the moral high ground when debating the behaviour of other road users. About time it took a dose of it's own medicine and condemned this obviously socially irresponsible behaviour.

Avatar
Simon E replied to philtregear | 4 years ago
9 likes

philtregear wrote:

Road cc is quick to take the moral high ground when debating the behaviour of other road users. About time it took a dose of it's own medicine and condemned this obviously socially irresponsible behaviour.

Why is it socially irresponsible? It's not obvious to me.

Avatar
Stratman replied to Simon E | 4 years ago
2 likes

Nor me

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Simon E | 4 years ago
0 likes

Because you are spreading it around - like the plague or something. Then everyone will die.

Avatar
philtregear replied to Hirsute | 4 years ago
0 likes

The responsibility is to demonstrate social lly isolating behaviour. Boasting about how long you have been out on strava is the opposite of this.

Avatar
Sriracha replied to philtregear | 4 years ago
4 likes
philtregear wrote:

The responsibility is to demonstrate social lly isolating behaviour. Boasting about how long you have been out on strava is the opposite of this.

Uh? You seem confused. Social distance is about staying 2m away from other people. It had nothing to do with the distance recorded on Strava. Never mind opposites, they are not even on the same axis.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to Sriracha | 4 years ago
0 likes

It is, but there seems to be a confusing conflation of that with the issue of 'travelling to a different area'. Hence most countries other than the UK stopping all incoming flights and more-or-less closing borders, or the police telling people off for shopping at a shop that isn't the closest one, or following lone hikers with drones.
I find the whole thing quite confusing, myself. It's not helped by government daily briefings where they pretty much completely ignore every single question, just instead saying something else entirely unrelated to the question just asked. I know that's a bit off-the-subject but I just listened to one and I'm finding the things a bit surreal - they have the form of a question-answer format, but the content is completely unrelated.

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 4 years ago
3 likes

FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:

It's not helped by government daily briefings where they pretty much completely ignore every single question, just instead saying something else entirely unrelated to the question just asked. I know that's a bit off-the-subject but I just listened to one and I'm finding the things a bit surreal - they have the form of a question-answer format, but the content is completely unrelated.

Even worse was the pretend apology from Priti Patel ‘sorry if people feel there have been failings’ over PPE" not that she was sorry they'd failed to supply it.  Positively vomit inducing.

Avatar
brooksby replied to eburtthebike | 4 years ago
0 likes

I saw that and thought how it sounded like a satirical fiction rather than reality, like if a TV show was trying to show a heartless and uncaring politician or corporate lawyer type who isn't even really pretending to be a normal human being.  IMO.

Avatar
crazy-legs replied to philtregear | 4 years ago
3 likes

No it's not. I see fewer people while I'm out cycling in the countryside than I do in the local supermarket. I appreciate that everyone's situation is different but out on a bike I'm far more socially distant and therefore near zero risk. 

You could actually argue the opposite - boasting about how long you've been out on Strava shows how keen you are to get away from everyone!

Avatar
Barraob1 | 4 years ago
5 likes

I see more people and come within closer proximity to people cycling round the block than I would if I was cycling in the hills. We've a 2km max radius from your house in Ireland, except for essential travel.

Pages

Latest Comments