The University of Edinburgh has been ranked the top university in the UK for cycling, according to research from the student accommodation search engine, Mystudenthalls.com, with the University of Bristol, in second place, and University of Glasgow, third, completing the podium.
A list of the top 25 higher education institutions ranked them on factors including cycling resources such as bike storage and pro-cycling initiatives, the availability of local bike shops and resources for novice cyclists, with points deducted for the prevalence of bike theft and air pollution.
The ranking comes ahead of a new academic year in which more students than ever are expected to shun public transport and use bikes instead not just because of cost and convenience, but also the coronavirus pandemic.
The University of Edinburgh’s top spot was achieved through initiatives including discounts in local bike shops, a Bike Buddies system to help new or inexperienced cyclists, bike maintenance courses and the provision of Dr Bike sessions.
Cambridge, perhaps surprisingly given its status as the UK’s leading city for cycling in terms of the proportion of the population who ride – many of whom study or work at its universities – came in sixth, partly dragged down by high rates of bike theft.
Dan Roberts, managing director and founder of Mystudenthalls.com, said: “While the national lockdown proved to be a golden age for cycling, the research highlights that many universities could be doing more to cater to the ever growing student cycling community.
“With many students returning to their studies with a new “blended” style of learning and continued anxiety surrounding the pandemic, cycling is one great way to support student wellbeing and encourage social distancing when travelling from halls to lectures.
> 8 of the best bikes for students — get to lectures on time with one of these bargain rides
“No doubt that universities will be investing into more ways to support students in jumping on their bikes.”
Here is the ranking of the top 25 universities.
1 – University of Edinburgh
2 – University of Bristol
3 – University of Glasgow
4 – University of Manchester
5 – University of Nottingham
6 – University of Cambridge
7 – University of Warwick
8 – University of Southampton
9 – University of Birmingham
10 – University of Oxford
11 – University of Exeter
12 – University of Sheffield
13 – University of Sussex
14 – Lancaster University
15 – King’s College London
16 – Imperial College London
17 – University of York
18 – UCL
19 – Durham University
20 – London School of Economics and Political Science
21 – Queen Mary University of London
22 – University of Leicester
23 – University of Aberdeen
24 – University of Leeds
25 – University of Liverpool
How did the company arrive at the rankings? Well, points were awarded based on the following factors:
Number of pro-cycling campaigns and initiatives listed on University and SU websites
Accessibility and number of bike storage/cycle parking facilities as listed on university websites
Number of clubs and societies for cycling listed on SU websites
Number of nearby bike/bike repair shops within 3 miles
Cycling resources and information listed on universities’ own online channels- graded out of 10 for comprehensiveness and accessibility. This includes info on hiring schemes, bike shops, local laws, etiquette, road signs, locks, and further resources.
Points were deducted for:
Rates of bike thefts and bike crime in the last 12 months (or most relevant data set available)
Air pollution rates of PM2.5 (fine particulate matter) pollution from DEFRA, with points deducted for higher rates.
Add new comment
8 comments
Rankings are not meaningful at all and I just wish people wouldn't do them...
Without any further information there's now way of knowing how good number 1 actually is in real terms (it's a difference if you come first at 100m sprint in the Olympics or your local pub's summer sports fun fest). And how widely the field is spread out: is the last only a little bit behind the first, or abysmally worse?
I'm pretty sure if same ranking was done in Netherlands, the last uni at the bottom there would be well above the top of the UK universities.
Just give a table with the actual scores.
Completely agree.
In terms of things that annoy me, pointless rankings come in at number 3.
Two comments I would make:
1 My daughter is in uni in Bristol but not in the 'University of Bristol' but in UWE (the University of the West of England) and they are within walking distance with each other and you would think that they would be very similar for that reason, but no sign of UWE on the list?
2 There are eight uni's in Wales but none on the list, which I find very hard to understand for a number of reasons?
People cycle when cycling is practical. To find the best place for cycling, just find the place with most cycling. No need to score "etiquette info on the uni website".
I could have told these guys, but they did not ask me. I wish people wouldn't call these marketing stories "research".
It gives no "structure" to how they decided the top lot....plus what happened to the rest? It is just as important to know the worest as the best! But only if there are meaningful metrics.
Some UK universities rated for cycling. There's about 160 universities in the UK so where are the other 140 odd?
What do they mean by 'rates of bike theft'? If this is just a raw number, or even a number per capita population, it doesn't make much sense that Cambridge loses out due to this, when it's surely in large part just a function of there being more bikes around to steal?
If you actually want to know which universities are best for actual cycling, don't rely on some compilation of marketing efforts that only looks at a small number of largely irrelevant things at a small subset of unis. Look at the local environment and the routes nearby. Cambridge is great for utility cycling but the routes nearby are all flat. In Bristol you have to deal with lots of traffic on very narrow streets. Sheffield, Lancaster and Bath all have much better access to great routes.