At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Plenty of cheaper bikes in the 70s and 80s had stem gear levers as an alternative to down-tube levers. I think it was to maximise damage in the...
That sounds a good summary. Of course, they may find "simple interventions" don't do what they think. And if "nobody messes around with their...
All good - but as usual a vote for a complete change of mindset. "Vision zero" can be a good, well defined program but I think a lot of the time...
Nice team too. 11th overall! I didn't pick Narvaez...
No, "for balance" they'll have the Association of Bad Drivers on / some other "I'm in favour of cycling, but..." folks!...
That only covers total rainfall, though. My (quite possibly erroneous) understanding, is that, while the trajectory is for more in total, it's also...
For anyone in the Sheffield area https://bsky.app/profile/ppushbike.bsky.social/post/3lgnamkc4t226
I ride quite a bit in Italy too, and the drivers are every bit as dangerous as in the UK. Close passing is terrible....
That's probably the point - they don't want you to have the standard colour scheme - they want you to pay for a custom one.
There's no way this design is lighter than a conventional design of equivalent strength.