At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
That has changed now, as with any "new" sport, it takes time to work out where the boundaries are, who gets to cover what and with which rules. BC...
I like that bridge metaphor
Typically you will signs like this one.
However, the highway code revisions now provide more detail and the cyclist overtaking picture has been updated. e.g.:...
And they were right. It says something about our society that people are prepared to put so much money and effort into opposing something as...
Could make a crass joke about how youre only supposed to flip pancakes today, but i wont...
I wouldn't worry too much about the locks being picked, in nearly all cases of bike theft, those Ninja moped gangs, the only things they can pick...
"There's some complex engineering in these things"
They want to pick on The Others in general, rather than a specific group. Immigrants can hate Others just as much as Nigel Farage does.
There's no doubting how bad the sport must have been when a banker feels moral enough to criticise...!