At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I think I also said, which isn't in your quote, that a lot of people don't have the savings or the spare disposable income to buy even a 'cheap'...
I can never understand why prosperous Kinston on Thames has no problem with cyclists going through the busy medieval pedestrianised part of the...
Should have been a lifetime driving ban -- and lengthy prison sentence -- the first time he hit someone and left them to die on the side of the...
The entire concept of "safe cycling routes" is insane, and bassackwords. A town near me is debating officially designating about 5% of its roads...
An appalling report by the BBC....
Reading this story, it's worth noting:...
Did the report make any mention of the pope defecating in the woods?
Of course it comes from boeuf but we are still using it that is the very point. Just like we use what are essentially archaic terms or essentially...
The Fr Russell Rd one looks horribly narrow, with a pedal-strike kerb against the cycle track on one side.
Nuclear powered one. https://www.eadt.co.uk/news/24653246.bramfield-nuclear-engineer-turns-be...