The Giro Rumble VR MTB shoes are a good option if you're looking for a casual shoe that you can also clip in for leisurely rides and commutes on trails or tarmac. You'll need overshoes if you're using them in wet and/or muddy conditions, but for dry, leisurely miles they do a decent job and are reasonably priced.
- Pros: Versatile, comfortable, look good and are functional off the bike
- Cons: Lack weather protection, slightly awkward engagement
While many mountain bike shoes are 'walkable' to a degree, usually it's just the heel bumper and some thin bits of tread either side of the cleat area that are responsible for evening things out, to make them less awkward to walk in than road shoes. The Giro Rumble VRs are designed to be more walkable than your regular mountain bike shoe, with just a deep recessed cleat area distinguishing them from the sole of a hiking boot.
> Find your nearest dealer here
As someone in the market for a shoe that I could ride to work in, continue to wear in the office, and walk in comfortably while I stop off at the shop to buy cake on the way home, I was keen to see if these would hit the spot.
Out of the box, there's a rectangular housing screwed in over the cleat shank, which you can leave on if you want to use them with flat pedals. This does create a bit of a wobbly experience for walking, and I found them more stable with the housing off. The sole is courtesy of Vibram, with a grippy diamond pattern. They'll be able to take on some pretty rough terrain, so you won't find walking in them an issue on trails or grass.
I was perfectly happy to continue wearing these at work when I arrived at the office – they don't get sweaty thanks to the breathable mesh, and they're as comfortable if not more so than most trainers.
On the bike, they're compatible with two-bolt cleats, and there are two positions for fixing them in. The recess is quite deep and narrow, which means engagement is a bit awkward and I found myself failing to clip in from the off while I got used to them.
They come with long, chunky, non-slip laces, which you could always swap out for some stealthier and smaller ones to keep things tidier and reduce the chances of the loops catching on the cranks; you really need to tuck the excess in to prevent this. Closure is good for a lace-up shoe; I didn't feel like my foot was insecure while riding.
While I wasn't expecting the stiffness of a dedicated road or mountain bike shoe, it's worth bearing in mind that you're going to feel quite a bit of flex through these when riding out of the saddle. The sole is solid, so is more sturdy than most walking shoes when off the bike, but it's got nothing on a cycling-specific sole. I also found it quite narrow, but it might suit your feet better. They're not ideal for full-on training rides, but then that's not what they're designed for.
Although they appear robust and the kind of thing you'd reach for in winter, they're not an ideal bad-weather shoe or for mountain biking (in the UK, anyway). The faux-suede gets absolutely sodden in the rain and they're also difficult to clean if you get them muddy. After an off-road adventure and some wet commutes, it took over 24 hours of leaving them wedged into a warm radiator before they were dry enough to wear again, which isn't what you want to hear if you plan on commuting in them daily in the UK or somewhere with similarly terrible weather.
This means, even more than with road shoes, you're definitely best off with overshoes for anything other than dry miles – not really ideal for what's described as a mountain bike shoe. The chunky shape of the heel counter will also mean your standard road overshoes might not fit, so you might need stretchier neoprene overshoes or to size up.
To assess their value, the obvious comparison would be Shimano's MT3 SPD touring shoes. They're five quid cheaper at £79.99 (and you can get them for £59.99 on Wiggle). Although I haven't tried them, the upper is a smooth faux-leather synthetic, so could be better for both staying dry and cleaning up after taking them off-road, though you may lose some of the breathability of the mesh on the Rumbles. They're also lighter at 330g a shoe.
> Buyer's Guide: Best casual cycling commuter wear
Overall, I like the versatility offered by the Rumble VRs, but I'd say they're much more of a touring/commuting shoe than a mountain biking shoe. Their main sticking point is that they don't really stand up well to the rain and mud, which means in the UK there are fewer situations where you can just slip them on and go, but for well under £100 if you shop around, they're still a pretty decent buy.
As well as our charcoal pair with orange laces and details, you can also get them in navy blue with tan laces.
Verdict
Versatile shoes that are great for commuting on dry days or use on light trails, but lack weather protection
Make and model: Giro Rumble VR MTB Cycling Shoes
Tell us what the product is for
Giro says, "The Rumble VR is a versatile shoe that combines performance riding features like clipless pedal compatibility with the walkability of a grippy Vibram outsole and the comfort of a light hiking shoe. With an upper made from a supple, breathable microfibre and mesh, and an injected inner shank to help transfer your power to the pedals it's a true cycling shoe that doesn't compromise the flexibility you need when you're walking on the trail."
Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?
Giro lists these features:
Vibram sole for walking grip
EVA footbed
Injected inner shank transfer
Four bolt holes, to fit two-bolt shimano SPD cleats
Lace-up
Breathable synthetic mesh on the upper
Rate the product for quality of construction:
6/10
Sturdy sole, breathable upper and well made for the money – but they won't stand up to much weather.
Rate the product for performance:
6/10
As a commuter shoe they're better than trainers, with the option to run with flat pedals or SPDs. They're not as stiff as dedicated mountain bike or road shoes, so power transfer isn't great, but they're fine for more leisurely outings. The mesh lets a lot of water in when it's wet or there's spray underfoot.
Rate the product for durability:
5/10
The mesh lets a lot of water in when it's wet or there's spray underfoot, and they're difficult to clean when they're muddy.
Rate the product for fit:
7/10
Quite wide and roomy in the toebox – definitely more like a trainer than a cycling shoe.
Rate the product for sizing:
7/10
My 45s sized up exactly as I'd have expected.
Rate the product for weight:
6/10
About right considering the Vibram sole and sturdy construction.
Rate the product for comfort:
8/10
Plenty comfortable on and off the bike.
Rate the product for value:
6/10
They're a fiver more than the similar (but possibly easier to clean) Shimanos, but hardwearing shoes that you can use for walking or riding for £85 isn't bad value.
How easy is the product to care for? How did it respond to being washed?
The upper is difficult to clean and they aren't machine-washable, so if you take them on treacherous rides once too often you might wreck them sooner than you'd like.
Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose
As a 'mountain bike shoe' in all weathers I'm not so sure; they're better suited to dry-days commuting.
Tell us what you particularly liked about the product
The comfort off the bike and versatility.
Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product
Not the best weather protection, slightly awkward engagement, lack of power transfer.
Did you enjoy using the product? Most of the time – not when they got wet and dirty.
Would you consider buying the product? No
Would you recommend the product to a friend? For leisure rides, yes.
Use this box to explain your overall score
The Giro Rumble is a versatile shoe that's good for leisure rides, commuting or use on light trails in the dry, but it lacks weather protection and will leave your feet soggy in the rain.
Age: 27 Height: 179cm Weight: 75kg
I usually ride: Road bike (currently Specialized Tarmac) My best bike is: Ridley Chronus TT bike
I've been riding for: Under 5 years I ride: Every day I would class myself as: Experienced
I regularly do the following types of riding: road racing, time trialling, commuting, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding, triathlon races
Add new comment
8 comments
It's funny that the tester didn't notice the elastic loops to tidy the lace ends and keep them away from your chainrings. I've had a pair of these for 'stealth' use for a year or two. I'd also have thought they'd be good for touring, but I'm surprised by how fast the soles wear down when you walk in them. These aren't going to last like the ancient Pearl Izumi "trainer style" cycling shoes that they replaced.
For touring I recommend Specialized Tahoes - although the sole is looking a little ragged around the cleat after three month's touring. Nonetheless, the sole still has plenty of material and the moulded studs still protrude. The new (2017 on) Tahoes are more flexible, so slightly more comfortable for walking than the originals, although I preferred the looks and sole of the originals. They're also a reasonable pair of steath shoes that won't get funny looks down the pub. I see that the Specialized web shop has them at sale prices. I hope that means that they're introducing new colours rather than abandoning them.
Did you return them to Wiggle? I saw a pair in 43 on their retuned items ebay site cheap, but then worried about sizing so didn’t bid.
I ended up giving them away, to some Deliveroo folk. Bit of a waste of money but sometimes you take a hit (about the only hit I need
word of warning - I purchased these and they were more than a full size to small. I couldnt wear them, in the end. I got a 43 and they were more like a 41.
I have had good luck with Pearl Izumi Journey models. Also PI isn’t owned by an assault weapons company which for me is a bonus.
I use these on my Brompton s a commuting, wear in the office shoe. They are perfect for that. Definitely not a mtb or touring shoe though, both need a more focussed cycling shoe.
I used these recently for Your Aotearoa - a 3000km offeoad adventure ride here in New Zealand. They're great as a general trail and hike-a-bike shoe - comfortable, ride well and the sole provides good traction when hiking tricky trails.
However the do have a downside in that the toe box area is very flimsy - the material that covers your toes degrades quite quickly. Both myself and another rider I encountered on the ride experienced this same issue with these shoes.
I've gone through 4-5 pairs of these, and I can confirm that the material in they're using the recent production is very flimsy. The mesh over the toe box develops holes at the flex points very quickly, well before there's any apparently use/age to the rest of the shoe. The first few pairs of the Rumbles I had didn't have this issue at all.
It's a shame, as these are the best SPD casual shoe I've found.