At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I think that the could be distilled to "I don't like cycling and so neither should you. And I don't like buses. Now stop wasting my money on...
was planning on getting some WD-40 / GT 85 rivalry going, looked it up and now mind blown! 🤯
"Due to land constraints, it has not been possible to increase the width of the path, although two metres is accepted within Department for...
Holds it in place better no doubt. It's not complicated.
Unfortunately then you end up with systems that emergency stop for an empty plastic grocery bag blowing across the road.
I met and rode with Mohit on an ultra event a couple of years ago, one of the nicest guys you could meet. So sad to hear this - RIP
I would suggest that while this is the level of technology required to replace humans performing at their best, I doubt most would have spotted...
Only uno-fish-ally, though.
Yeah - but torx is obviously the plural of torque, so you're getting more for your money.
In my experience road tubeless rarely holds air consistently. Losing a few psi per week is the norm with some much worse than that. I have one...