At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Bonus: the more you do it, the quicker you'll get!
They want to pick on The Others in general, rather than a specific group. Immigrants can hate Others just as much as Nigel Farage does.
There's no doubting how bad the sport must have been when a banker feels moral enough to criticise...!
Do you remember back in the 80s/90s, when new major road projects were constantly bedevilled by protesters (remember Twyford Down??)? Ah, those...
I don't think they've come in from that end at all - all three approaches are bollarded, and I don't think there's room to get through. I think...
He should apply the drillium technique to save weight on that big heavy battery, it's so bulky too, aero holes will help.
More clearance damnit!!!
I've done the 167 course a couple of times and it is a great ride. The marketing stuff gives the value added to the local economy through this...
I have some video and correspendence I must send through at some point....
These things don't generally wind up in court - that prospect functions as a kind of glue for the months / years of wrangling over money that...