Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Garmin HRM-Fit

8
£139.99

VERDICT:

8
10
More comfortable than a standard chest strap, with additional features – reflected in the price
Comfortable
Additional features for Garmin device users
Connects quickly
Doesn't fit with all sports bras
Expensive
Weight: 
53g
Contact: 

At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the road.cc scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Garmin HRM-Fit is a heart rate strap designed specifically for women, clipping directly onto sports bras. While it's more than double the price of some heart rate monitors on the market, it does offer additional features when paired with Garmin devices, and I found it much more comfortable than a standard chest strap.

Not sure if the HRM-Fit is right for you? You'll find more options in our guide to the best heart rate monitors.

The HRM-Fit is designed to offer a more comfortable alternative to a traditional chest strap for women by attaching directly to the bottom band of a sports bra. It uses three clips – the pod in the centre and one on each side.

2024 Garmin HRM-Fit on.png

Garmin specifies that it's only compatible with medium- and high-support sports bras, to ensure the strap stays securely in place. It actually provides a page listing the supported types. You do need to wear a fairly tight sports bra to ensure good contact with the strap and your skin. I found that unpadded, low-impact sports bras caused the heart rate strap to gape, while long-line sports bras placed the sensors in the wrong position, affecting the accuracy of the heart rate readings. It may be useful to look at your sports bra collection before purchasing the HRM-Fit, but I didn't have any issues as it worked with most of the sports bras I typically wear while cycling.

The strap is one length (13.2in wide), and for me, being a 34B bra size, it sits across the width of my front without reaching all the way to the sides, meaning it's not restrictive. You want to make sure that the strap is tight across the sports bra with no gaping for accurate readings, and this is best done by attaching the monitor after putting your sports bra on.

2024 Garmin HRM-Fit on 2.png

The clips are easy to open and close and don't mark or snag the fabric of the sports bra. While the clips are bulkier than a standard chest strap, and the central pod that houses the battery protrudes slightly, I didn't find it noticeable or uncomfortable during use as the strap goes against your skin and the clips sit on the front of your sports bra. They also didn't interfere with wearing a cycling jersey.

2024 Garmin HRM-Fit - 4.jpg

In terms of comfort, I found the HRM-Fit an improvement over standard chest straps. It eliminates the extra material tucked away underneath your sports bra, and avoids the tight, constrictive feeling of having to do a chest strap up tight to fit underneath a sports bra. Once it was clipped on, I barely noticed it was there, and it stayed secure throughout my rides without ever feeling loose or shifting out of place.

Connectivity

The HRM-Fit transmits data via ANT+ and Bluetooth to whichever device you're using. I connected it easily to my Wahoo Elemnt Bolt and the Coros Pace 3 smartwatch that I've been testing (full review coming soon).

The performance of the strap was equivalent to a chest strap, and I had no issues with it dropping out, whether riding inside or out; even for high intensity intervals it tracked well.

If you're using a Garmin device with the Garmin Connect app, the HRM-Fit offers some additional features. It tracks various metrics such as steps, heart rate variability, all-day heart rate, calories burned, and intensity minutes, with all this data being stored and syncing to your device and Garmin Connect feed.

2024 Garmin HRM-Fit - boxed.jpg

If you run as well as cycle, the HRM-Fit also captures running dynamics like cadence, stride length, and left/right foot balance, which can be sent to a compatible Garmin smartwatch, but I wasn't able to test these additional features. The HRM-Fit certainly offers more functionality than I need for basic heart rate monitoring during my bike rides.

Quality

The HRM-Fit has a claimed battery life of 12 months, based on one hour of use per day. It uses a CR2032 battery, with the design following a coin-cell battery compartment that can be unlocked with a coin. This compartment fastens and unfastens securely. Garmin switched to a tool-free battery replacement system with its HRM-Pro Plus.

It's rated to 3 ATM, meaning it's splashproof but not designed to be used while swimming. Attaching it to a swimsuit would be a challenge, too...

The whole unit seems very well built, and after numerous sessions on the turbo trainer, sweat hasn't appeared to cause any issues.

Value

At £139.99, it is a lot of money for a heart rate strap, but it does offer some extra features for running and swimming.

It incorporates features from Garmin's premium HRM-Pro Plus, for example, including running dynamics, but interestingly, the HRM-Pro Plus is £20 less than the HRM-Fit, retailing at £119.99.

If you're happy with a standard heart rate strap purely for cycling, Garmin's HRM-Dual is less than half the price of the HRM-Fit at £59.99.

We haven't tested any women-specific heart rate monitors, but the concept of a sports bra that allows you to clip on a heart rate monitor isn't entirely new. For example, Shock Absorber has the Ultimate Run Bra – Heart Rate Monitor Edition for 89 CAD (that's around £50) which features poppers where you can attach a Garmin or Polar heart rate monitor.

Similarly, the Sensoria Sports Bra includes a built-in heart rate monitor and costs $129 (that's around £100).

Conclusion

The standout feature of the HRM-Fit is its clip-on design, which is both effective and far more comfortable than a standard chest strap. It does include additional features that are more than you need for basic heart rate monitoring for cycling, though, which contribute to its higher price.

Verdict

More comfortable than a standard chest strap, with additional features – reflected in the price

road.cc test report

Make and model: Garmin HRM-Fit

Size tested: n/a

Tell us what the product is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Garmin says: "Purpose-built for women, HRM-Fit is the heart rate monitor you need to capture the important metrics – all with a comfortable clip-on design."

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Garmin lists:

- dimension: 33.5 x 3.3 x 1.7 cm (13.2 x 1.3 x 0.7in)

- module size: 31 x 55.5 x 14.2 mm (1.2in W x 2.2in H x 0.6in D)

- weight: 53g

- water rating: 3 ATM

- battery type: CR2032

- battery life: up to 12 months (using 1 hour per day)

- battery door type: coin slot

- designed to attach directly to a sports bra: Yes (works with medium- and high-support sports bras)

Rate the product for quality of construction:
 
9/10

The whole unit seems very well made and the coin-cell battery compartment fastens and unfastens securely.

Rate the product for performance:
 
9/10

No issues with heart rate dropping out and the strap fitted more comfortably than a standard chest strap.

Rate the product for durability:
 
8/10

No issues so far.

Rate the product for weight (if applicable)
 
7/10

Similar weight to a chest strap heart rate monitor – the Garmin HRM-Pro Plus is 52g.

Rate the product for comfort (if applicable)
 
9/10

More comfortable than a chest strap.

Rate the product for value:
 
4/10

More expensive than Garmin's HRM-Pro Plus chest strap, which also has additional features, and more than double the price of heart rate monitor chest straps on the market.

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

No issues with connection via Bluetooth or ANT+. Fitted medium and high-impact sports bras well and was comfortable to wear.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

The fit – I found it far more comfortable than a standard chest strap.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

The price.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on road.cc?

It's a lot of money for a heart rate strap. It incorporates features from Garmin's premium HRM-Pro Plus, but the HRM-Pro Plus is £20 less, retailing at £119.99. Garmin's HRM-Dual is less than half the price of the HRM-Fit at £59.99.

We haven't tested any women-specific heart rate monitors, but the Sensoria Sports Bra includes a built-in heart rate monitor and costs $129 (that's around £100).

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Yes

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your overall score

I really liked the clip-on design, finding it much more comfortable than a standard chest strap, and for this reason I think it's very good, even though it's on the pricey side. It offers more features than I need for basic heart rate monitoring while cycling, but if you can make use of them then they help offset the cost.

Overall rating: 8/10

About the tester

Age: 23  Height: 175  Weight: 64

I usually ride: specialised tarmac sl6  My best bike is:

I've been riding for: 10-20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: road racing, commuting, club rides, general fitness riding, fixed/singlespeed, mtb,

Emily is our track and road racing specialist, having represented Great Britain at the World and European Track Championships. With a National Title up her sleeve, Emily has just completed her Master’s in Sports Psychology at Loughborough University where she raced for Elite Development Team, Loughborough Lightning.

Emily is our go-to for all things training and when not riding or racing bikes, you can find her online shopping or booking flights…the rest of the office is now considering painting their nails to see if that’s the secret to going fast…

Add new comment

4 comments

Avatar
Secret_squirrel | 2 days ago
0 likes

Seems like a lot of extra money to pay for the alledged additional accuracy of a chest strap when you could put that money towards a smart watch with HRM or an arm strap HRM for half the price...

People tend to assume HRM's need accuracy - they dont - they need consistency, which means for most people a smart watch or arm strap is more than sufficient.

Avatar
wtjs replied to Secret_squirrel | 2 days ago
0 likes

the alleged additional accuracy of a chest strap

I have a Polar H10 chest strap, and a Polar Verity Sense optical HRM. I am convinced that the H10 is more accurate in that it can detect the highest rates more reliably, which is important when you're try to establist maximum HR. Otherwise, the optical up on the biceps is very close. Apple has proved, possibly by just employing 'more power' that even wrist optical is good enough.

Avatar
Nick T replied to Secret_squirrel | 2 days ago
1 like

It's £15 more than their similarly featured unisex HRM Pro, it shouldn't be more but I suppose you can argue the design has a smaller market. Cheaper HRMs are available, including Garmin's own HRM Dual at less than £50, you can find chest straps for £20 but long term reliability starts to become a concern. 
 

I almost bought one of these Fit units by mistake when I went to the LBS for a new strap and the staff pulled it out of the display case, the box doesn't make it very clear at first glance that it's women specific

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to Nick T | 2 days ago
0 likes
Nick T wrote:

It's £15 more than their similarly featured unisex HRM Pro,

Thats hugely overpriced too unless you want the running stats, when the basic Garmin or Polar is £45.  And again there are a dozen watches that can do the running stats.  Piling tons of functionality into a sensor doesnt make sense for 90% of uses.

Latest Comments