Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

The Road Book 2011 – Cycling Almanack

9
£45.00

VERDICT:

9
10
The Road Book team turn their attention to 2011, with the same dependable result that we have seen before
Applies the successful format to another significant year
It might not be your preferred year
Weight: 
970g
road.cc Recommends

This product has been selected to feature in road.cc recommends. That means it's not just scored well, but we think it stands out as special. Go to road.cc recommends

At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the road.cc scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

The Road Book team are at it again: The Road Book 2011 is the almanack of that year's racing, which 'reverently and diligently captures this historically significant cycling season'. The first of these 'blue book' retrospectives appeared last year, setting a high standard for subsequent years to follow – and that quality has been maintained.

> Buy now: The Road Book 2011 for £45 from The Road Book

The Road Book 'red cover' series started with the 2018 season, and has carried on with its successful format ever since; last year the same principles were applied to more distant years for the first time, starting with 1989.

Now it's the turn of 2011 to receive the same treatment. If you are already familiar with the formula, then you will be reassured to know that the quality has been maintained; if you are not familiar, then our previous reviews can help to give you an idea of what to expect.

There are over 150 other years that could have been chosen, and it would be possible to make a strong case for many of them – but editor Andy McGrath makes a compelling argument for choosing 2011, not least for 'the depth of its controversies, tragedies and dramas.' And let's not forget Cav's well-planned victory at the Worlds, as covered in Project Rainbow.

McGrath reckons that 'print was king back then', so magazines of the time were still a valuable resource for research. However, the digital revolution was well underway, meaning that images were more plentiful and statistics were more readily accessible – making that side of the task a little easier than it was for the 1989 edition.

One advantage of waiting a few years before publishing the definitive record is that you have a better chance of showing the correct results: take the 2011 Vuelta a Espaňa as an example, where it took eight years for original winner Juan José Cobo to be 'banned and stripped of his title for biological passport abnormalities'. (This means that Chris Froome was finally awarded his first Vuelta victory a couple of years after he had already won his second!)

> 42 of the best cycling books

Alberto Contador is another major reason for the use of asterisks – and there are a few other culprits as well. Are there any others yet to be unearthed? Who knows, but they certainly don't make it easy for those compiling such reference books.

As we now know to expect from the 'blue books', the main races of the year are expertly encapsulated – just with a little less detail compared to the 'red books'. Other race coverage is even more reduced, or in the case of lesser events, non-existent.

It's all too apparent how few opportunities women had to succeed back then: there simply weren't many top-level races for them – and of those, Marianne Vos seemed to win rather a lot of them.

As editor, McGrath whets the appetite for what it to come with his well-judged five-page summary of the season, which is followed by a variety of other essays, including 'In the winners' words'. These are always a highlight for me – writing from top riders rarely disappoints, and contributors don't come much more significant than Cadel Evans and Chris Froome.

Annemiek van Vleuten hadn't reached her peak in 2011, but her account of the racing year reveals her ambitions. It's a fascinating account of a rider growing into her future role, and I would commend it to all aspiring pros. I hope that there is more like this to come from her.

Emma Pooley is another proven winner, but in her contribution she focuses on her least welcome race, the Ronde van Vlaanderen – where 'the most positive result was that I somehow avoided both crashing and pissing myself… Give me the steep side of the Mortirolo any day'.

Social media was also making its presence felt, giving the opportunity for a page of the best 'Tweets of the year'. Who can forget Lance Amstrong's claim in May of 2011: "20+ year career. 500 drug controls worldwide, in and out of competition. Never a failed test. I rest my case." That didn't age well.

Graham Watson was a well-respected photographer at the time, which was confirmed by his end-of-career book 40 Years of Cycling Photography. He's been back into his archives again, to provide 15 pages of images to reflect the season – they're sure to bring back a few memories.

The Road Book team claim that 'you won't find another publication that captures 2011 quite like this', and they are right – but then there's not a lot of competition. It's early stages for the 'blue' project, but as more historical years are documented, I can see the appeal of the 'blue books' widening. Maybe that'll solve the present buying dilemma for some fans of the sport?

> Buy now: The Road Book 2011 for £45 from The Road Book

Verdict

The Road Book team turn their attention to 2011, with the same dependable result that we have seen before

road.cc test report

Make and model: The Road Book 2011

Size tested: Hardback

Tell us what the product is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

From the publisher:

The Road Book 2011 is a beautifully made hardback that reverently and diligently captures this historically significant cycling season. Every race and moment is lovingly remembered and retold by those who were there.

This book combines race statistics, infographics, essays and personal insights with our characteristic attention to detail.

With an introduction by our guest editor Andy McGrath (cyclist, author and journalist), commentaries and essays by Gino Cervi, Emma Pooley, Chris Froome, Annemiek van Vleuten, Ned Boulting, Cadel Evans, Johan Vansummeren and Giorgia Bronzini, you won't find another publication that captures 2011 quite like this.

Graham Watson's photography does a sublime job of showing the big races, top riders and seismic scenes from the 2011 racing season. These visceral images resonate just as powerfully today as they did then, and bring the season's action flooding back.

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?

Title: The Road Book 2011

Editor: Andy McGrath

Publisher: The Road Book

Date: August 2024

Format: Hardback

Pages: 412

ISBN: 9781916484993

Price: £45

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

It does exactly as promised.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

It provides some reassurance that the 'blue series' has a future.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Makes you regret that it hadn't been done sooner.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on road.cc?

The price is up £5 on last year, which is the same increase as already applied to the more expensive 'red' books – so not unexpected.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? Yes

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your overall score

The 1989 version of The Road Book set the standard for the 'blue' series, which the 2011 edition continues. The quality matches the 'red' series, but the quantity doesn't – hence the slightly lower score

Overall rating: 9/10

About the tester

Age: 60  Height:   Weight:

I usually ride:   My best bike is:

I've been riding for: Over 20 years  I ride: Most days  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: touring, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding,

Add new comment

3 comments

Avatar
Cristox | 2 months ago
0 likes

AlmanacH, with an H...

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Cristox | 2 months ago
0 likes

Nope.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Cristox | 2 months ago
0 likes
Cristox wrote:

AlmanacH, with an H...

It can be, or it can be almanac, or it can be almanack as spelt here, all are equally correct; the -h ending version is probably the least common in English, though it is the correct spelling for French and German.

Latest Comments