Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

TECH NEWS

First Look: Whyte Glencoe 650b Road Plus bike + Q&A with Whyte's head designer

Aluminium 650b road bike with progressive geometry + interview with Whyte's head designer

Take the rough with the smooth says Whyte on the webpage for its new £1,299 Glencoe, a 650b Road Plus bike which brings together a lot of the emerging trends in the road bike market into a really compelling package that will appeal to anyone wanting a smooth, comfortable, stable and confidence-inspiring road bike. 

The 650B alternative: Is this smaller wheel size right for you?

The Glencoe combines an aluminium frame and fork rolling on wide profile WTB tubeless-ready rims and WTB Horizon 47mm tyres, and the stop and start are taken care of by an SRAM Apex 1x11 groupset, with an 11-42t cassette and 44T  chainring, and TRP HyRd hydraulic disc brakes with 160mm rotors. The finishing kit is all Whyte branded, including the 50cm wide handlebar that is unique to the Glencoe. Yes at 11.56kg (25.48lb) it’s heavy, but weight isn’t everything.

The frame is neatly appointed. There are mudguard mounts, and our test bike has the optional mudguards that Whyte has designed for the Glencoe, as well as rack mounts so you could use it for commuting, Audax and touring if you wanted. The seatclamp is a neat internal design with a rubber bung to stop the bolt head filling with dirt. Cables are internally routed and there’s an externally threaded bottom bracket.

whyte_glencoe_-_down_tube.jpg

What sort of bike is the Glencoe?

Whyte pitches it primarily as a road bike, albeit one that is intended with its big tyres and relaxed geometry to be able to better tackle the poorly surfaced roads most of us have to contend with better than a conventional road bike. It's intended, perhaps rather boldly, as a better road bike than your last road bike. That's based on the fact it has a lot of good technology, the wide tubeless tyres on wide tubeless rims, a simple and wide range drivetrain, hydraulic disc brakes and sensible finishing kit.

But it's the geometry that really sets it apart from a conventional road bike. The focus with the numbers and angles is on providing much more stability when riding rough roads and descending tricky rural country lanes, and boosting confidence for those cyclists that might find handling a typical race bike a nervous affair.

The key changes include a long front centre that is designed around the use of a short stem and very wide handlebar, which shows a hint of mountain bike influence. The length added to the top tube has been taken out of the stem, so the overall reach is more or less the same as a regular road bike.

Lastly, the head angle is slacker than most road bikes at 70-degrees and the fork offset is 38mm (a typical road bike is about 51mm) to increase the trail which has the effect of producing very calm and stable steering. The wheelbase is also long, 1,077m on the 54cm bike.

Fat tyres FTW

650b isn’t a new wheel and tyre standard, it’s actually quite an old one, favoured by French touring cyclists back at the beginning of the 20th century. It’s reappearance in the mainstream is as much a direct response to the deteriorating state of our roads, with potholes and gravel certainly a common occurrence in my local rural lanes. The 47mm WTB Horizon tyres on the Glencoe provide roughly the same outside diameter as a 28mm tyre on a 700c rim, so the geometry of a regular road bike can more or less be preserved.

whyte_glencoe_-_tyre_and_rim.jpg

However, the key benefit of the 650b tyres is obviously the big volume they provide. Installed tubeless, as this Glencoe is, and run at low pressures, they provide a very smooth road that helps to smother all the imperfections in a badly surfaced road and cushioning you from bigger holes and impacts.

Improved traction is an obvious bonus in bad weather, when the roads are covered in mud, grit and water. And rolling resistance, despite their appearance, is not at all dreadful - they’re surprisingly quick. Lastly, they can, weather dependent, cope with a bit of off-road action as well.

There is a weight penalty to the bigger tyres, and an aero impact as well, and if racing or fast sportives is your sort of cycling these probably aren’t the tyres for you. But if your riding is steady cruising speeds, the sort of speed that lets you enjoy the views and the company rather than chewing on the stem, then 650b tyres are an interesting and exciting alternative to 700c.

Understanding the Glencoe with Whyte’s Ian Alexander

I've covered the key details of this new bike above, but to get a better understanding of the Glencoe, I went for a ride with Whyte’s designer Ian Alexander and put a few questions to him.

road.cc: Who is the Glencoe aimed at, and what sort of riding is it intended for?

Ian: The versatility designed into the Glencoe should mean it will appeal to almost any road rider (or off-road rider who wants to ride on the road for that matter) in the UK who likes to keep off the main roads, stick to the lanes and go exploring at their own pace.

As anyone who rides regularly knows, the condition of the roads across the UK has been deteriorating it seems for many years, to the extent that some lanes and back roads are nearly approaching the status of well kept bridleways…

Unfortunately the random nature of these roads and lanes means it can make riding very unpredictable. With the Glencoe we wanted a bike that was so confidence-inspiring, stable and safe to ride and yet still rolled like a fast road bike. To do that we felt that the new WTB Road Plus tyres were going to be a big step to achieving the levels of comfort, impact compliance and an all-round capability quite unlike any conventional road bike could ever get near.

This means whilst one minute you can be on a great tarmac surface, more often than not you can soon be plunging down a steep lane with mud, gravel, water run-off, pot-holes and corners and really be searching the limits of your confidence and to this end, the Glencoe should expand your limits and allow you to really attack and enjoy these challenging terrains rather than fear them.

650b tyres are popular right now, why do you see them as the right fit for this bike?

Well, I’m interested in the large volume these tyres have. The physics behind larger volume tyres rest on the relationship between the air volume, which is the combination of the tyre width together with the internal rim width, the pressure in the tyre and thirdly the vertical stiffness of the tyre carcass, often referred to as the casing tension inside the tyre itself.

Essentially as the volume of the tyre increases the pressure can be lowered for the same vertical stiffness of the tyre. This means that although the pressure in the larger volume tyre is lower than it would be for a smaller volume tyre, it can maintain the same vertical stiffness and hence roll along the road without feeling any slower at all.

Of course, because the pressure is lower, when it comes to a square-edge impact such as a pothole, the large volume tyre can deform against this obstacle much more easily and give much greater compliance and comfort compared to a higher pressure tyre.

The usual pressure in a 700c x 23mm tyre can be anywhere between 110-120psi, but for the same feeling in vertical stiffness, a 27.5” x 47mm tyre can be run at 40-50psi.

With this huge increase in compliance of the tyres as well as the increase in grip and traction it really boosts the all-round capability of the Glencoe. So with the limiting factors of braking and traction hugely improved, it allows us to really push forward in other areas of the bike’s development, namely the Geometry.

The geometry sets the bike apart from regular road bikes. What have you tried to achieve with the angles and numbers?

In 2010 I wanted to have a crack at the 3-Peaks Cyclo-Cross race, so I designed a cyclocross bike which was pretty progressive in geometry. It was built around a 70mm stem, a longer than usual frame, a slack head angle and disc brakes. It really gave me the confidence to tackle such an extreme race which is closer to a fell race than a bike race.

whyte_glencoe_-_cable_routing.jpg

We put those ideas into production very successfully with our cyclocross bikes and more recently the Whyte Gravel bike range of the Friston and Gisburn. So I felt with the Glencoe that the same radical approach to confidence-inspiring geometry should be designed into the bike.

The combination of hydraulic disc brakes and RoadPlus tyres mean that the geometry of the bike is the next limiting factor to be addressed in road bikes. So the Glencoe uses the same concept of added length in the frame, approximately 50mm longer than a traditional road bike, with a correspondingly 50mm shorter stem length to keep the cockpit and fitting length the same.

A slack, but not super slack, head angle of 70-degrees can then work much better with the shorter stem. We have designed our own 500mm (centre-to-centre) handlebar which is wider than anything on the market currently, to again work best in conjunction with the short stem.

This bar has a conventional shape but with a short reach, to give the feel, not unlike stubby bar-ends when the rider is on the brake hoods and a shallow drop to aid comfort on longer head-wind road sections. The final piece in the overall geometry package of the Glencoe is a custom offset fork which has allowed us to fine-tune a very critical parameter of the steering kinematics.

Fork offset isn't something that's talked about much on road bikes, but it's been pivotal to the design of the Glencoe. Where did the thinking for the shorter offset come from?

The Glencoe fork is a special offset specification for Whyte of 38mm (usually the offset on gravel bikes is a more common 51mm) so that allows us to develop a totally homogeneous geometry concept for the bike including handlebar width and shape, stem length as well as frame geometry including length, bottom bracket height, rear centre and head angle among other critical dimensions for the feel and handling of the bike.

We have been working and riding prototypes of this reduced offset concept in a lot of different bikes in recent years, both road and MTB hardtail and full suspension bikes, and our pioneering and award-winning MTB designs have benefitted from this new thinking in fork offset design. It seemed obvious to test the general concept on the road with a RoadPlus bike that we wanted to have the best most confident inspiring geometry possible for road riding in the UK.

whyte_glencoe_-_fork.jpg

Fork offset is a key way of controlling the amount of trail and a whole raft of complicated and multi-faceted steering related geometry parameters. Trail is the generating and stabilising effect of the forward motion of the bike and is defined as the distance by which the contact patch of the front tyre ‘trails’ behind the steering axis when we extend the steering axis down to intersect with the ground. The more trail a bike has, generally speaking the more stable, calmer and predictable (confidence-inspiring) the steering of the bike is. The bike is less affected by knocks, potholes and undulations in road surface that cause destabilising forces to be introduced to the steering system.

In recent years we have generated larger levels of trail by reducing the head angle and making the bikes slacker. This only works up to a point. However reducing the fork offset has the effect of moving the front wheel tyre contact patch further rearward and increasing the distance the contact patch is ‘trailing’ the steering axis. This has the same effect on steering kinematics as reducing the head angle as well but without the flopping from side to side often associated with very slack head angles and still maintaining a light and neutral steering feel when out of the saddle climbing on the Glencoe.

Reducing the trail from 51mm to 38mm is a significant increase in Trail, but also a significant reduction in the bike’s front centre dimension, and this is why the reduced offset concept is part of a total homogenous frame length, geometry and component spec concept and not just fitted to a standard geometry frame and finishing kit.

Overall it’s been a big step forward in the control and confidence of the Glencoe and puts the modern road rider firmly back in control over the prevailing road conditions that we all have to live within the UK.

Brief first ride impressions

After a couple of rides around my local lanes in the Cotswolds, it’s clear the Glencoe is very different to any regular road bike.

It’s the handling that sets the Glencoe apart. It’s so impressively stable and planted on tricky narrow descents, with a feeling of control more akin to riding a mountain bike with wider riser bars than a conventional road or gravel bike. You can bomb down descents with much more confidence, and that’s great regardless of your experience level, but a boon to less experienced cyclists for sure.

whyte_glencoe_-_bars.jpg

The steering is slower and measured, there’s nothing twitchy or nervous about the handling at all, and that is really highlighted at higher speeds. Yet it’s still agile enough if you need to suddenly carve around a massive pothole you’ve only spotted at the last moment. The short offset of the fork ensures the slack head angle doesn’t lead to a flopping steering sensation that I have experienced with some bikes in the past.

I’m used to narrow handlebars on road bikes, but the wide bars, in combination with the short stem and long top tube, gave a familiar riding position that was comfortably stretched with a clear emphasis on maximum control. Pushing your hands out wider gives a relaxed and commanding position that lets you really control the Glencoe to the full.

- Review: WTB Horizon TCS Road Tyre

Despite their girth, the 650b tyres are deceptively quick. They don’t feel sluggish and draggy, but if you do try and push on at higher speeds your effort level can rise dramatically as the extra weight and drag become apparent. They have a definite speed sweet spot that I found is about 25-30kph give or take a few clicks, what you might describe as a steady cruising speed.

The Glencoe is no lightweight road bike, but it doesn’t ride in a heavy way. It’s not as swift up climbs as a lightweight race bike for sure, but it’s actually a really nice bike to climb. Out of the saddle the Glencoe feels very like a mountain bike with stubby bar ends, and the wide bar and compact SRAM hoods provide a very nice climbing experience, if climbing can ever be described as nice!

And best of all, where even 28mm tyres transmit a lot of the road surface to the contact points, the 47mm tyres run at about 45psi simply soak up all the bumps and holes in the road. It doesn’t matter that the frame and fork are made from aluminium, the big tyres provide all the suspension you need.

So first impressions are very good. This isn't a bike that will appeal to everyone, it’s not a bike for hammering the local chaingang or hanging with your mates on their lightweight carbon aero bikes. But it’s really not trying to be that. If you want a versatile, comfortable and capable bike for cruising around the country lanes, training and commuting on, with the cushioning, traction and bombproofness of the big tyres, you’ll get on well with the Glencoe.

The handling is a highlight, it’s a fun bike to ride and makes riding on dodgy lanes and at high speeds as safe and easy as it could be on a road bike, and it’s packed with nice details and attention to detail. The Glencoe represents an exciting and radical reinterpretation of what a modern road bike could be.

There'll be a full review of the Glencoe soon.

www.whyte.bike/glencoe/

David worked on the road.cc tech team from 2012-2020. Previously he was editor of Bikemagic.com and before that staff writer at RCUK. He's a seasoned cyclist of all disciplines, from road to mountain biking, touring to cyclo-cross, he only wishes he had time to ride them all. He's mildly competitive, though he'll never admit it, and is a frequent road racer but is too lazy to do really well. He currently resides in the Cotswolds, and you can now find him over on his own YouTube channel David Arthur - Just Ride Bikes

Add new comment

21 comments

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 6 years ago
0 likes

As this pages comes up on google search results when looking for info on the glencoe I thought I'd update it.

 

The production version of this has the rear seat stay bridge and mudguard mount hole - the zipties mentioned in the above comments are not required. Thankfully. Amazing how many manufacturers mess these up...

Avatar
zero_trooper | 6 years ago
0 likes

650b - it's a 'thing'!

Here's Pinnacle's take on it - the Pyrolite 

https://www.evanscycles.com/pinnacle-pyrolite-1-2018-adventure-road-bike...

even comes with designer's notes! 

https://www.evanscycles.com/coffeestop/news/pinnacle-pyrolite-leading-th...

A C2W friendly £950 for 2x8 Sora (48/32 11-32), alu fork (there's an explanation in the notes) and mechanical disc brakes. That's some 650b premium methinks.

Avatar
Accessibility f... | 6 years ago
1 like

That mudguard implementation is disgusting.  Cable ties on the chainstays ffs?  And the mudguards clearly don't fit the bike as they get closer to the wheel just past the seatstays.  They've clearly been jammed in and made to "fit".

Typical Whyte attention to detail - get it out the door, get the next one built.

Avatar
Curto80 | 6 years ago
0 likes

I bought one of these second hand recently. I wanted something relatively inexpensive that I could smash round the new forest and other gravel tracks. Whyte have a proven track record of making good bikes and this is no exception. It’s just great fun.

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 6 years ago
1 like

So it's a specialized tricross only heavier, lots more expensive and 10 years later.
Surely with the popularity of disc frames you dont need to mess about changing the wheel size to get a wider tyre now do you?
My now 11 year old spesh globe pro and expert take 55mm 700C tyres (without guards), why are we making out wide tyres on a road bike is a new thing?

Despite this being a 1x system, having smaller wheels/tyres, it's still 2.5kg heavier than my triple set up with the globe (including a brooks and it being a 58).
There's seemingly no progression in bikes and their use only sideways and retrograde steps with renaming bikes/activities plus marketing to make them seem like the latest and greatest.
It isn't but is costing a shed load more money AND weight to find out!

Weight might not be a big consideration for some but hints at frame and component quality, zip ties to secure mudguards is just the tip of the iceberg, I mean really, zipties ... WTF!

Avatar
BBB | 6 years ago
0 likes

650b wheels with 38-42mm tyres will fit quite a few endurance/allroad/adventure/CX bikes. Providing  there is sufficient clearance and bottom bracket drop of 70mm or less, you don't need a dedicated 650b bike. Anyone curious can just grab a set of 27.5 MTB wheels and give it a go. lt is as simple as that.  Tyres like Compass or Schwalbe G-One series will  allow your bike to roll at least as fast as your mates' racing bikes.

The reviewed bike really looks like it's geared towards backpacking and light offroad. "Progressive" geometry, mtb stem and  wider bars to ride on bad roads are overkill IMO. Increased tyre volume combined with reduced pressure on any bike with typical endurance geo bike will have enough stabilising effect on handling.

Avatar
dassie | 6 years ago
0 likes

A 26-27" lowest gear for a bike that could be seen as a 'drop bar rigid hardtail', is a bit disappointing especially for rougher bits on steeper tracks, and also given the bike is 'not the lightest'.   Not the end of the world though.

Avatar
nortonpdj | 6 years ago
0 likes

Those mudguards are much too short.

Avatar
dassie replied to nortonpdj | 6 years ago
0 likes
nortonpdj wrote:

Those mudguards are much too short.

 

Don't look too bad to me.  One could always buy or make mudflaps for under a tenner.   3

Avatar
1961BikiE | 6 years ago
1 like

I liked the look of this and the price when I saw it on Whyte's site. I know the tyres take out a lot of harshness but the ally fork does put me off. Surprised that they couldn't squeeze a carbon one in tbh even if it would have added a little to the price. TBH stiff competition from the Pinnacle Arkose at the same price with full hydro brakes, 2x subcompact gearing and a carbon fork.

Avatar
michophull | 6 years ago
0 likes

Very smart bike. Really like it. However, I'd change just one thing. Dual pivot calipers instead of the disc brakes.

Avatar
Miller replied to michophull | 6 years ago
2 likes
michophull wrote:

Very smart bike. Really like it. However, I'd change just one thing. Dual pivot calipers instead of the disc brakes.

Good luck with finding a rim caliper that will straddle a 47mm tyre! That one thing, disc brakes, is kinda central to the entire concept of this bike.

 

Avatar
matthewn5 replied to Miller | 6 years ago
0 likes
Miller wrote:
michophull wrote:

Very smart bike. Really like it. However, I'd change just one thing. Dual pivot calipers instead of the disc brakes.

Good luck with finding a rim caliper that will straddle a 47mm tyre! That one thing, disc brakes, is kinda central to the entire concept of this bike.

You could always use canti brakes back in the day.

Avatar
kil0ran | 6 years ago
1 like

Those mudguards are almost utterly pointless. And yet again badly fitted, particularly on the rear. Zipties? Really? How hard is it to provide either a permanent or sliding bridge?

If its a bike designed for shitty backroads then at least get the frame/rider/rider buddies protection right.

At least the fork is drilled for a dyno light.

I liked the look of this when it popped up on Whyte's site but ultimately decided I couldn't live with the aesthetics of the bent seat tube, just looks like its been in a massive stack.

Avatar
kevvjj replied to kil0ran | 6 years ago
1 like
kil0ran wrote:

Those mudguards are almost utterly pointless. And yet again badly fitted, particularly on the rear. Zipties? Really? How hard is it to provide either a permanent or sliding bridge?

If its a bike designed for shitty backroads then at least get the frame/rider/rider buddies protection right.

At least the fork is drilled for a dyno light.

I liked the look of this when it popped up on Whyte's site but ultimately decided I couldn't live with the aesthetics of the bent seat tube, just looks like its been in a massive stack.

Agree about the zip ties - a few rides on our wet, gritty, bumpy roads and those zip ties will be scouring lovely scratches on thos seat stays...

Avatar
Luv2ride | 6 years ago
0 likes

Quite tempted by these I must say, but would prefer a carbon fork to (presumably) lighten it a little and especially at that price.  Will be scouting the classifieds and ebay for these....

Avatar
Jimthebikeguy.com | 6 years ago
0 likes

Its a lovely idea, and I think if you imagine (as mentioned above) it as a drop bar rigid hardtail, maybe change the tires for something with teeth, and use it as a monstercross bike, it would rock the sh*t.

One question, i know the crankset is a whyte item, but what mount standard does it use if you wanted to fit a different ring?

Avatar
philhubbard replied to Jimthebikeguy.com | 6 years ago
0 likes
jterrier wrote:

Its a lovely idea, and I think if you imagine (as mentioned above) it as a drop bar rigid hardtail, maybe change the tires for something with teeth, and use it as a monstercross bike, it would rock the sh*t. One question, i know the crankset is a whyte item, but what mount standard does it use if you wanted to fit a different ring?

 

Looks like a rebranded FSA crank from the non-drive side, the chainring is a standard 130BCD 5-arm. Something like Wolftooth or Superstar may be the best bet for an alternative

Avatar
Grahamd | 6 years ago
0 likes

Reads as though this is a bike you need to experience to appreciate. Any chance of having one available at one of your events?

Avatar
check12 | 6 years ago
1 like

“Yes at 11.56kg (25.48lb) it’s not heavy, but weight isn’t everything.”

What is this supposed to say? 

 

How much does the bike weigh if you weigh without wheels? 

Avatar
David Arthur @d... replied to check12 | 6 years ago
2 likes

check12 wrote:

“Yes at 11.56kg (25.48lb) it’s not heavy, but weight isn’t everything.”

What is this supposed to say? 

 

How much does the bike weigh if you weigh without wheels? 

It was a typo which I've corrected, apologies. 

Latest Comments