- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
13 comments
Pfft.....
Think yourself lucky, at least you have a cycle lane with some kind of segregation, even if pricks in their cars think its somewhere to park their motor.
Up here in Derby the council have decided that to meet it's commitment to Clean Air Zone is to remove one of the very few cycle lanes altogether, as increasing traffic speed is alledgedly the way to reduce pollution!
Go figure.....
I wish we could hold council members responsible for counter-productive decisions like that. I'd love to see them held responsible for illnesses and deaths caused by their slavish devotion to the personal motor vehicle when the inevitable pollution still doesn't meet legal levels.
One of the best things Bristol could do is go around and replace all those stupid orange screw-in wands with proper bolted-to-the-road permanent ones ...make the 'pop-up' lanes permanent.
I know I go on about it a lot (venting, for my blood pressure) but the Park Row lanes in Bristol are a complete waste.
I can use the entire length from Lower Park Row to the traffic lights at the top of Park Street, going westbound/home, at most once per week. There is always at least one van parked in them, and usally several. When the council teams come and replace the wands, it takes no more than a day before the wands have pretty much all disappeared again (are they the new traffic cones, for students?).
Last night there were two cars parked in the section west of the exit from Trenchard Street multi storey; another two in the next section ending at the White Hart pub; and another five in the section from the kebab shop to the traffic lights.
Waited behind one outside the White Hart until they realised I was there. They moved their car forward and perched it right next to the kebab shop. I told the driver this was (supposed to be!) a cycle lane, and she apologised but didn't do anything like actually driving off (?).
I moved to the next car, a couple sat there with their engine running, eating their kebabs; as I started to speak, the male passenger just reached over and wound his window up without even acknowledging me.
The next car (also headlights on, engine running) had a woman in it, who made some sort of pantomime about 'oh, so sorry, didn't realise, etc etc'.
The next two cars were empty.
If the council isn't going to actually send traffic wardens along to enforce the no-parking restrictions, and isn't going to replace the temporary plastic wands with proper un-removable things, then the whole exercise is a complete waste of their time and money and simply a box-ticking exercise so they could say they've 'done something'.
I've emailed the Highways Team and the Mayor's Office to complain
Yep - those temporary bollards are a bit crap. Bristol needs some decent permanent active travel infrastructure (for bikes and illegal e-scooters too), but most of the infrastructure that I've seen around Bristol has been poorly thought out and doesn't connect with anything useful. The bits around Temple Meads are fairly useless unless you like stopping and waiting (after pressing a beg button) every 10-20m.
What seems bizarre to me is the "Whitehall would not fund any measures, such as new cycling routes, that did not directly help to drive down NO2 levels in the city to the legal limit or below".
Now as far as I'm aware, getting people out of cars and onto bikes will definitely drive down NO2, so I can't understand why they won't fund active travel in an effort to bring our air to legal limits unless maybe they and their friends don't stand to make much money from that.
Plus the fact that they ARE funding Ebike loans makes a mockery of the whole statement anyway.
Conservative party donors are presumably not so involved in bicycles, hence Whitehall's lack of interest...
I'd say that applies to Labour as well - I can't recall them advocating active travel in any meaningful way.
It's all about following the money.
Did you see this morning's Post - the mayor wants to legalise all those privately owned e-scooters. Apparently there are so many of them being ridden around all the time even though they're illegal, that he thinks it makes sense to just make them legal (presumably, rather than getting Avon & Somerset to actually enforce the law...?).
I agree with him. It makes perfect sense rather than the ludicrous concept that they are vehicles and somehow need to be linked to driving licenses, and you getting points on your license for riding one. Its madness.
The law should have changed already but again Politicians arent really serious about reducing cars on the road.
I agree. I'm no particular fan of e-scooters, but I think the horse has well and truly bolted, and they're just going to have to legalise them. It's interesting the way they're sold - e.g. Wiggle gives a lengthy product description, then right at the end a tiny line saying you can only use it on private land.
I agree. As personal transport, e-scooters are small, light and cheap compared to motor vehicles.
Currently, the law allows motorists to feel entitled to harrass e-scooterists for not being allowed on the roads, even when they might happen to be using a legal version (e.g. VOI). Legalise them and then see how best to deal with the problems they cause. I suspect that the number of KSIs will be fairly small in comparison to those caused by motor vehicles.
Isn't fully? Isn't at all, until they need to prop up a project (HS2) or a friend's business. We already have some electric cars. There's no way that businesses, councils and governments aren't going to suck all the potential money from that having ponied up a fair bit for some R & D and infrastructure in advance. If you're a company and you don't grab the cash, someone else will.
Hopefully (or sadly, if you're tight for cash...) we'll not end up with quite as many private cars.
For the easily triggered I think it's clear that this applies to all governments over the last few decades, all hues.