- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
5 comments
Thought this was touched upon in a blog earlier this week. The same ammount of victims and it being in the same state as the Rolling Coal incident last month rang a bell or two.
Struggling to understand the narrative. Was his "failure to maintain his speed" a consequence of colliding with so many cyclists, or did he hit the cyclists because he slowed down?
Could be an odd way of saying that instead of maintaining a steady speed behind them, they accelerated into the back of them. It sounds as though the investigators aren't much clearer at this point either, though, given that it says they are 'trying to piece together' what happened.
I thought that was strange wording, but it's just what they call speeding in Texas...
https://mcminnlaw.com/texas-refresher-failure-to-maintain-speed-law/
From your link, it looks as if the Texas "failure to maintain speed" law applies when one vehicle collides with another, regardless of whether the colliding vehicle is exceeding the speed limit.
The extract from the law quoted on that page: “An operator may not drive at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the circumstances then existing”
The article goes on to say that this means that under Texas law the driver of the "back" vehicle is automatically at fault in the event of a rear-end collision.
Doesn't explain why the driver walked free, but makes the circumstances of the accident easier to understand.