Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Video: London cyclist gets £50 for straying off shared use path blocked by phone box

Councillor hits out as cycling campaigner hit with £50 fine for moving out of cyclist area of shared use path

A cyclist who strayed into the pedestrian side of a shared use path has been fined £50 by a police officer.

Kristian Gregory, of the Croydon Cycling Campaign, was riding along the New Kent Road on Thursday morning when he was stopped by the officer who asked him why he was not riding on the cycle path. 

Responding that the path was shared use, Kristian is then told that he is in fact on the footpath.

As seen on helmet camera footage Kristian points out that the ‘cycle path’ is blocked at one point by a telephone box which he is forced to move into the footpath to avoid, but the officer is unswayed by his protests that he is making the best of a very bad situation and a Fixed Penalty Notice is issued. It would also seem to be impossible for cyclists to reach the crossing seen at the end of the footage without also crossing the footpath.

 

According to the Highway Code, when using segregated tracks cyclists must keep to the side intended for cyclists as the pedestrian side remains a pavement or footpath.

Cllr Mark Williams, Southwark's cabinet member for regeneration, planning and transport, told the SE1 website:

"Although this is not a Southwark Council managed road, we've already contacted the police asking them to review enforcement action on this stretch as cyclists are forced to cross the pavement to get safely across the New Kent Road.

"We want to encourage and increase the number of cyclists in Southwark, but need to get the balance right between what looks like overzealous action in this case and the safety of others on roads and pavements.

"I am also asking Transport for London to look urgently at the design of the cycle path on the New Kent Road which appears to be the cause of these problems.

"This highlights how we need better design for cyclists across London, which is why we are leading the way by bringing in Danish and Dutch experts to help come up with the best and safest solutions to get more people to cycle and significantly reduce casualties at the same time."

Kristian said: "When the FPN for cycling on the pavement was introduced, the minister responsible at the time, Paul Boateng stated:

 'The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of the traffic, and who show consideration to other pavement users.

'

"Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle on the road.

"Sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required.



"I agree that the police should be using discretion in enforcing this law and would support Paul Boeteng's original guidance."

Add new comment

39 comments

Avatar
chris4567 | 10 years ago
0 likes

That cycle way is terrible. As well as the phone box it runs in front of the door of a church. The other stretch of the NKR cycle way is almost as good! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1234234/Sign-times-The-cycle-pat...

Avatar
darrenleroy | 10 years ago
0 likes

Don't PCSO's have to pass some kind of fitness test? He looks very out of shape. I wonder if he even knows how to ride a bike?

Avatar
Big Softy replied to darrenleroy | 10 years ago
0 likes

Sod the fitness test, that moron PCSO couldn't even pass an intelligence test.
What an officious prick!

Avatar
Sub5orange | 10 years ago
0 likes

That officer is pedantic. Cannot believe anyone would issue a ticket for this. He was probably trying to get to his weekly target of fixed penalty notices. The way he comes across, he probably achieves his target in one morning, relaxing the rest of the week.

Avatar
bikez | 10 years ago
0 likes

'Sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required' Wow that's an oxymoron for sure. Seems like a 'witch hunt' going on here.

Avatar
darrenleroy | 10 years ago
0 likes

While I agree with your sentiments I don't agree with your choice of negative descriptive terms. How do you know the motorist was a gypsy? Was he in a waistcoat and colourful neckerchief, driving a painted wagon with horses?

There is something wrong with being stopped by a bloke who has a position of authority whose grasp of English is so poor he says 'yeah' at the end of every sentence in a bid to add verification to his statement.

Avatar
georgee replied to darrenleroy | 10 years ago
0 likes
darrenleroy wrote:

While I agree with your sentiments I don't agree with your choice of negative descriptive terms. How do you know the motorist was a gypsy? Was he in a waistcoat and colourful neckerchief, driving a painted wagon

Rusty transit, double axel caravan behind it with all the seats covered in clear polythene and a load of lead from a church roof on his passenger seat.

Avatar
georgee | 10 years ago
0 likes

Plastic pigs doing a hashed job of traffic enforcement shocker!

As good as the one in dirty tooting this week ignoring all blocking the ASL and driving into the blocked yellow hatched box. Or the motorbike copper ignoring some gypsy who kept cutting into the bus lane without any indicating almost clipping cyclists on cs7

Avatar
Bob's Bikes | 10 years ago
0 likes

 24  24  24  35

Pages

Latest Comments