Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

My brother’s not a doper, says Jonathan Tiernan-Locke’s twin sister

Family left “devastated” by former Team Sky rider’s ban

The sister of former Team Sky cyclist Jonathan Tiernan-Locke insist that he is not a drugs cheat, despite the 29-year-old being banned last week for two years due to irregularities in his biological passport.

The rider’s twin sister, Caroline Tiernan-Locke, says that their family has been left “devastated” by his ban and that the treatment of her brother since news broke of his ban has been “nothing short of inhumane.”

In an interview with the Plymouth Herald, she said: “Demonstrating nothing but pure talent and sheer determination, I have watched my brother, through tears, sweat and pain, sacrifice his younger years in favour of modelling his life around a gruelling training schedule to earn his place in the cycling world.

“It was no surprise to any of us to watch him succeed so greatly, and as a family we cheered on, full of admiration as he worked his way up from junior team to semi pro, to the best team in the world, gaining many incredible titles along the way.”

Tiernan-Locke was still with Endura Racing when he signed up to the UCI’s biological passport programme in late 2012 ahead of his move to Team Sky. In September of that year, he won the Tour of Britain, a title that has now been taken away from him.

“He was tested every single day at the Tour of Britain and he has never once failed a test,” his sister went on.

“He won that title and all other titles fair and square and those who know and have trained with Jonathan, will know that he is an honest, extremely hard working and incredible cyclist who has been failed by the system that he set up to protect himself.”

She added: “His hard work and reputation now lie in tatters. He is deeply saddened, angry, frustrated, helpless and feels betrayed by the media.

“Above all, he’s just a lad that has had everything he’s ever dreamed of and worked for, taken away from him in devastating fashion.

“This was his career, his hopes and dreams. This was his life.

“We have been living under a black cloud for almost a year. There seems to be no justice and no sense to all of this. It is simply not right and not fair.

"Not only has the cycling world lost a true talent but it has cast a shadow over an innocent young man’s life and has left us distraught.

"They can take away his titles but they can’t take away his talent and determination and we know that eventually, Jonathan will rebuild his life with the people that matter.”

Sky sacked Tiernan-Locke as soon as news of his ban became public, with Team Prinicpal Sir Dave Brailsford saying: “Jonathan’s contract has been terminated today.

“Whilst there have been no doubts about his time with us, his doping violation – from readings taken before he joined this team – means there’s no place for him in Team Sky.

“We’ve a well-known stance on anti-doping and our action is the inevitable outcome of a violation.

“This is a team that trains, races and wins clean,” he added.

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

36 comments

Avatar
Jimmy Ray Will replied to AyBee | 10 years ago
0 likes
AyBee wrote:

I don't buy your story at all - for me, the above is what makes me doubt his innocence. He was on fire at Endura which is why Sky signed him, and then he falls to pieces when he joins Sky - coincidence, or was there just a more strict regime and this "overtraining" and "illness" was just an excuse for not doping at Sky? I doubt anybody knows for sure other than JTL, and that includes his sister.

Well, from understanding his Endura regime in comparison to his Sky regime, I'd suggest there was plenty of reasons for him overtaining that wasn't doping.

However, I'd concede that an after effect of stopping blood doping will be that you can no longer sustain such heavy training loads which could have led to the overtraining/sickness... but make no mistake, the reason he performed badly was overtraining, whatever the cause.

The key point I am making, is that as mentioned, only he can say for sure what he did and didn't do, but the reality was, he was never getting off the charges brought against him either way.

Avatar
bikemadjo replied to Paul J | 10 years ago
0 likes

incorrect, he failed to prove his innocence COMPLETELY DIFFERENT!

Avatar
TimC340 | 10 years ago
0 likes

I think the UCI owes both JTL and the public a more detailed explanation of what he's supposed to have done. Or are we now simply to accept a finding of 'guilty' without supporting evidence being shown?

Avatar
miro_o replied to TimC340 | 10 years ago
0 likes

.

Avatar
miro_o replied to TimC340 | 10 years ago
0 likes
TimC340 wrote:

I think the UCI owes both JTL and the public a more detailed explanation of what he's supposed to have done. Or are we now simply to accept a finding of 'guilty' without supporting evidence being shown?

If you read the UCI statement (on the UCI>Road page currently) you will find:

Quote:

At this stage, with the relevant appeal windows open, the UCI will not make any further comment on the case.

Due to the public interest I'm sure there will be information at some point.

Avatar
VecchioJo | 10 years ago
0 likes

is this anything like Tyler Hamilton's twin brother?

Pages

Latest Comments