John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Add new comment
23 comments
Good job Dave. Keep it up.
Not sure if "No Ifs. No buts. No Coconuts." is really the perfect catch phrase? "No ifs. No buts. But 6 points on your license!" would be my dream catchphrase.
Yesterday I saw a policewoman driving a police car talking into her mobile phone. Clear as day.
'No ifs, no buts, no coconuts'. Wise words indeed from our ever vigilant friend.
He does make a good point. If his actions result in one less death or injury it's worth it. Hard to gauge but taking idiot drivers off the road or making them think again has to be a positive.
Meanwhile, I'm struggling to get Thames Valley Police to take action despite the incident being caught in Hidef because - and I kid you not - my camera footage isn't what they consider independent evidence.
Jesus wept.
Its so difficult, isn't it? On the one hand, to not report and call people on their bad driving behaviour is to risk normalising it, so that nobody even thinks its bad any more (mobile phone use and speeding - I'm looking at you).
Unfortunately, on the other, there are so many people with helmet cameras who come across as self righteous know-it-alls (Traffic Droid, I'm loking at you).
Its so difficult, isn't it? On the one hand, to not report and call people on their bad driving behaviour is to risk normalising it, so that nobody even thinks its bad any more (mobile phone use and speeding - I'm looking at you).
Unfortunately, on the other, there are so many people with helmet cameras who come across as self righteous know-it-alls (Traffic Droid, I'm loking at you).
I find riding alongside those texting at lights and pretend to read the text is quite effective. Even better when the windows are open is shouting dead parrot fashion," He's f**ing driving and on the phone." Suddenly phones are hot potatoes.
As for this guy, if he feels it makes a difference, so be it.
I wouldn't call the man a vigilante if he reports the offences to the police or to the employer. And even if nothing seems to happen as a result (no sackings or prosecutions) that doesn't mean nothing has happened. It could well be that after it has been brought to his or her attention, the driver is now taking more care - which is what we want drivers to do. However, those mobs of knuckle-dragging morons that see the footage on YouTube and start harassing the employer and go overboard in wilfully trying to harm the company are vigilantees as far as I'm concerned.
Generally, I don't have much time for those cyclists which post vids of any and every little misdemeanor committed by drivers.
However in this case, all of the offenses highlighted in the article were serious, and very worthy of being called out, so well done sir.
seemed clear to me.
Oh, and can people calm down on the 'V' word?? The question seemed OK to me.
and it didn't to me.
If you want an idea of how dubious this bloke >may< be:
http://veloevol.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/sherry-lies-videotape.html
I'm betting if I followed him around on his bus route I could identify a few mistakes. Hell, in the video clip on the BBC site yesterday he already shows us he doesn't know how to indicate clearly on a bicycle (go look at it).
There's recording for your protection and then there's recording with the intention of 'catching out' as many people as you can, which is just sad.
People like this are usually pretty ignorant about their own faults and mistakes in my experience, often worse than the people they are 'catching'.
Overall, he just comes across as a twat to me.
Ah, with friends like you, who needs enemies?
Not the sort of person I'd be friends with. Or at least, not a friend you really want to spend much time with.
Probably is one (twat) but I've considered one for the car the amount of dicks I see using a mobile is staggering but what is worse is idiots usually women texting, you can tell because all you can see it the top of their heads while they're looking down. I had one pass me on the M1 North of Dublin texting whilst doing about 90, looking down the whole time, I couldn't give a sh*t if she wiped herself out but they usually end up taking some unfortunate with them.
I never notice bad driving when I'm on the bike I'm usually too busy blowing out ma' arse.
Had the same experience on the M90 between Perth and the FRB lately. I’m sitting at 70mph on the cruise control and this woman in a Red Audi(shock Horror) A1 passes me. Big deal. Next thing she’s slowed up considerably, so I pass her. Next thing she’s overtaking me again, and up you’ve guessed it, she’s slowed down again. Wasn’t till the 3rd time of this happening we noticed that every time we passed her her head is looking at her lap. Over nearly 25 miles this happened until eventually she must have finished her Facebook/Text chat and was never seen again. Shame really, as I was hoping to see her embedded in to the back of an artic.
I haven't watched the programme yet, but I would like the idea behind this to get into the heads of every driver. The ones that think it is funny to close pass you, the ones that pull out in front of you because "you're just a bike", the ones that don't take their driving seriously, the ones who thinks bikes shouldn't be on the road, the ones who squeeze past you, brake and then turn left, I could go on...
The American Sniper of commuters.
Sir, I salute you.
May you come and cleanse my streets of bad drivers any time.
A good reporter would have said, "so does this not leave you open to claims of behaving like a vigilante?"
I must admit that it is still staggering the amount of drivers one sees in town either texting or talking on their mobile phone. The message just isn't getting through (no pun intended) about the dangers posed and the police seem either incapable or unwilling to stamp it out.
I am still ambivalent about Mr Sherry's actions as it feels a little too much like a classic English Mr Do-good Busybody...but maybe if a loved one of mine had been killed by a driver not paying attention at the wheel then I might have a different attitude
It's staggering the number of drivers I spot on the phone when I'm cycling.... then I get in the car and see it far more frequently in the rear view mirror. Admittedly this is usually when sitting at lights, so slightly less of a worry, but still. Whether the car's moving or not, anyone with their head down texting/emailing/facebooking isn't in the slightest bit aware of what's going on around them.
Certainly more effective than the PCSOs.
It is all open and shut, the only issue is the date involved.
Pay for all cyclists to have the latest gopros and the fines will pay for the scheme within a year
That's a very nice jacket.
He must be back from Wyoming.