In a week in which professional cycling is again in the headlines over doping, it has been revealed that AG2R-La Mondiale rider Lloyd Mondory has tested positive for EPO. The news coincides with Lampre-Merida leaving the Movement for Credible Cycling (MPCC) after deciding to re-engage Diego Ulissi following his ban, in contravention of the voluntary organisation’s rules.
In a statement, the UCI said it had “notified French rider Lloyd Mondory of an adverse analytical finding of EPO in a sample collected in the scope of an out-of-competition control on 17 February 2015.
“In accordance with the UCI anti-doping rules, the rider has been provisionally suspended until the adjudication of the affair,” the governing body added.
Mondory retains the right to ask for his B sample to be tested, but could face a ban of four years – twice the previous maximum for a first-time, deliberate offence following the coming into effect of the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code in January.
The 32-year-old is the third rider from the French team to fail an anti-doping control in the past two and a half years.
Sylvain Georges tested positive for banned substance heptaminol at the Giro d’Italia in May 2013, while the previous September, Steve Houanard tested positive for EPO. They were banned respectively for 18 months and two years.
The team, a member of the MPCC, voluntarily suspended itself from last year’s Critérium du Dauphiné under a rule requiring members to suspend themselves from racing where two riders have tested positive in the preceding 12 months.
News of Mondory’s positive test comes a day after fellow MPCC member Lampre Merida withdrew from the MPCC following its decision to re-engage Diego Ulissi, who was banned for none months after testing positive last year for excessive quantities of the anti-asthma drug, salbutamol.
Under MPCC rules, members cannot sign a rider who has served a doping suspension of six months or more until at least two years after the suspension has ended.
In a statement released yesterday – the same day that the Cycling Independent Reform Commission published its report which said that doping remains widespread in the peloton – Lampre Merida said:
With this Communication, Team Lampre-Merida officially confirms the decision to exit the MPCC, due to the impossibility of confirming there membership.
This decision has been made considering the facts coming from recent events, namely the case of Diego Ulissi, this situation in particular has put Team Lampre-Merida in a position where we are obliged to take this decision as these principles set out by the MPCC are not possible to agree upon, namely: 1) The labor law, 2) Rules and regulations of the UCI.
Team Lampre-Merida will respect the obligation to keep Diego Ulissi as our employer, and with this ensuring the obligation of return to competition for the athlete – respecting the rules and regulations of the UCI – through entry to the races from 28 March 2015.
In reference to the above, Team Lampre-Merida is obliged to postpone its membership with the MPCC, with a possible future consideration for the request of readmission at a time when the rules of the Movement, which in the past have always been respected by the team even though at times have been unfavorable, as long as the regulations are acceptable by the laws of the various bodies of reference.
Add new comment
13 comments
Who are we to judge? Lloyd Mondory, a lifer at AG2R, popped for EPO. Poor guy probably just felt he needed it to keep up and maintain a contract. Looking at many statistics out there, the pro peloton is as fast now as it ever was. CIRC was both damning and depressing. The amateur ranks, if you believe it, are rife with doping. Are riders expected to just stop once they hit the pro ranks?
Cycling has still got doping problems, but so do many other sports (rugby & tennis in particular) . There isn't the will to pursue it by other sports governing bodies, so cycling & athletics take the hit.
At a broader level, is it realistic to expect athletes to be monks and lead pure,clean lives, when the rest of the world is doping? Every time I go on the internet, the amount of ads promoting weight loss pills, testosterone pills, pills putting gyms out business pills - the list is endless.
What even is 'clean' anymore?
As a clean rider who doesn't take any pills to go cycling - I'm happy enough to judge someone who takes out their own blood for treatment to gain an advantage.
That leaves 10 World Tour members of MPCC, including AG2R and Astana. Is the MPCC credible?
Hopefully it's not 90% that is doping but on recent evidence there is still a long way to go before we have a genuinely clean peloton.
Meanwhile the MPCC seems to be utterly pointless, a complete joke.
A typo in the article, or Freudian slip?:
'who was banned for none months after testing positive last year for excessive quantities of the anti-asthma drug, salbutamol.' banned for NONE months?, sounds about right.
Shocking!!!
The 2-speed peloton is back! The clean fast riders and the slow doped riders! Doping clearly doesn't work any more, so why waste money testing?
Are teams aware riders still doing EPO ?
AG2R were a team most believe are clean, are they unfortunate with what is a nobody ?
As for Lampere, WTF ?? are they just stupid ?
Another fall guy!
If the guy is guilty , I hope he swings - the new 4 year ban should see to that. However, I thought that in addition to having harsher sentences, the authorities were also going to end the (in my view unfair) habit of announcing the name of a rider whose A sample fails, before he has exercised his right to have his B sample tested. What's the point of a B sample if, even though it may clear the rider, his name has already been dragged through the mud?
They are announcing a suspension, and the reason for it. They are always careful to point out that B sample hasn't been tested yet.
It would be a bit odd if a rider was suddenly suspended but no reason given.
Incidentally I am not aware of any athlete in any sport testing positive on their A sample, but being cleared by the B sample. Presumably in the early days of testing this happened otherwise the second sample safeguard wouldn't be there... anyone know of a case?
They are announcing a suspension, and the reason for it. They are always careful to point out that B sample hasn't been tested yet.
It would be a bit odd if a rider was suddenly suspended but no reason given.
Incidentally I am not aware of any athlete in any sport testing positive on their A sample, but being cleared by the B sample. Presumably in the early days of testing this happened otherwise the second sample safeguard wouldn't be there... anyone know of a case?
The timing couldn't have been better!