- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
6 comments
Just looked on the Upgrade Bikes website and it appears that the affected fork has aluminium dropouts, carbon legs, carbon steerer, but an aluminium crown joining the steerer to the fork legs. Which is the only option not covered by the exclusion criteria, as I'm sure they meant it to be..............
Still seems contradictory. What fork would not meet those exclusion criteria? One with alloy legs and a carbon steerer?
The middle image even appears to have a "full carbon" decal.
Not road.cc's fault of course but things like this should be unambiguous.
The affected forks have a carbon steerer, carbon legs but have an alloy crown
Second to last paragraph is a bit confusing.
If full carbon, full alloy, AND carbon/alloy forks are all ok, what does that leave?
Suggest removing that paragraph or reword it to be explicit about what is and isn't affected.
I also find it confusing, but that's pretty much what it says in the notice:
Put it in a list so it's much clearer now