- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
6 comments
the CTC (now CUK) sponsored a women's road team a couple of years ago, not sure what happened to it tbh or how much it did for either parties but at least they were in there and doing something that helps women's cycling as they (CUK) do all the time.
BC ... meh!
There is a reason many female riders avoid BC like the plague when asked to join their performance programs. Simply because it is track, track, track in BC's mind.
You just have to look at the riders leaving the performance programs to join road teams to see that a BC women team taking "control" over riders are never going to work, those they would want on that team would never settle for something like that anyway because their current teams allow them to do track when an event needs to be focused on.
Someone at BC has finally done the maths. If Laura Kenny has another kid, Katie Archibald continues to enjoy road and with recent retirements BC are short about 12 medals at the next Olympics.
Even the statement reads as 'damn these women going off to do their own thing, we need more control so we can get them back on the Track where they can earn us funding'.
If it has been done 3 years ago it might have some credibility but this is the BC that still can't be bothered to fund half the things the Italians and French do when it happens to be women doing them.
Also the link between Sky and BC has been questioned, why would they repeat?
because then they can say "but we thought about it" to stop people keep asking the question why cant they do it, or why they cant just upgrade Team Breeze to a WWT status. I mean in the quoted article he's talking about how theyd need a yearly budget of millions, I dont think even the top level WWT teams spends millions a year so you can see how closely and how long theyve thought about it.
Pahahaha
British Cycling couldn't care less about women's road racing. It barely gives a shit about men's road racing. It only cares about track, where medals can be quantified and, within reason, 'guaranteed'. And now they want 'greater control' over riders' race programmes so that they can 'also' do track? Sounds to me like they're more interested in preventing track riders having a road career at all.