Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

US guns and ammunition firm to sell its cycling accessories businesses

Vista Outdoor to offload brands including Giro, Bell and Blackburn, targets of boycott after February’s mass school shooting in Florida

US-based firearms manufacturer Vista Outdoor has said it plans to dispose of sports brands including Bell, Giro and Blackburn following what it describes as a “comprehensive strategic review” of the business.

The company, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, says that the review was initiated last November, but its ownership of the cycling-related brands came under particular scrutiny  in February following the mass shooting at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida that left 14 students and three members of staff dead.

In the wake of that tragedy, there were calls for consumers to boycott brands owned by the Farmington, Utah-based business, which derives the majority of its $2 billion-plus annual turnover from sales of weapons, ammunition and related accessories, due to its support of the National Rifle Association (NRA).

> Should you boycott a bike brand if its parent company supports the NRA?

In March, the Mellow Johnny’s bike shop in Austin, Texas co-owned by Lance Armstrong announced that it would no longer be selling products produced by brands belonging to Vista Outdoor, a decision also taken by several national sporting goods retailers, due to the company’s relationship with the NRA.

> Lance Armstrong’s bike shop drops cycling brands owned by gun firm

Announcing its results for the year to 31 March 2018 today, Vista Outdoor said that following its strategic review, it planned “to explore strategic options” – corporate-speak for sell, or otherwise dispose of – brands identified as being non-core to its business, including Bell, Giro and Blackburn, as well as its Savage and Stevens firearms brands.

The company will instead focus on the brands it owns in ammunition, hunting and shooting accessories, outdoor cooking products, and hydration bottles and packs – the latter including CamelBak, which in March, in response to calls for a boycott of its products, sought to distance itself from other companies within the group.

> Camelbak says it is completely separate from from Vista Outdoor’s NRA-supporting shooting segment

CEO Chris Metz said today: "Vista Outdoor is excited about the potential of each of our core businesses, particularly ammunition, which is our largest core business.

 "An increased focus on our heritage ammunition business will manifest itself in more innovative and breakthrough new products introduced over the next few years.

“We also anticipate that by prioritising this business, we will be able to invest more capital to further enhance and expand our global leadership position."

He added: “We intend to begin the portfolio reshaping immediately, and anticipate executing any strategic alternatives by the end of Fiscal Year 2020."

In common with other publicly quoted companies in the United States, Vista Outdoor is required to outline potential risks and uncertainties related to what are termed “forward-looking statements” in its financial reports, such as forecasts of future earnings.

Some of those are generic, such as “general economic and business conditions,” while others are specific to the business, for example, “changes in laws, rules and regulations relating to our business, such as federal and state firearms and ammunition regulations.”

Clearly, there is no way of knowing whether any consumer backlash following the Florida shooting played a role in the company’s decision to offload its sports-related brands, and any impact on the business’s bottom line will only become apparent when it reports its first-quarter results this summer.

However, it’s worth noting that the forward-looking statements disclaimer to the results announced today includes, for the first time, acknowledgement as a risk factor of “use of social media to disseminate negative commentary and boycotts.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

9 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 6 years ago
1 like

This is an encouraging result, but they I'm wary that these are just 'plans' and they may change their minds again before selling off the bike brands. I'm going to wait until the companies have split before they can get any of my money although I think I've only ever bought one Giro helmet so I don't think they'll notice my lack of business.

Avatar
froze | 6 years ago
1 like

I say we ban guns because as you and I know guns kill people, people don't kill people.  And while we're at banning guns we need to ban cars too because just recently in Canada a van killed 10 people and injured 15 others, this isn't the first time a motor vehicle was used in violence, this is what will happen when guns are gone, cars will take over as the primary weapon of choice; so lets ban cars too because as you and I know cars kill people, people don't kill people.

Avatar
jaspersdog replied to froze | 6 years ago
0 likes

I say we ban guns because as you and I know guns kill people, people don't kill people.  And while we're at banning guns we need to ban cars too because just recently in Canada a van killed 10 people and injured 15 others, this isn't the first time a motor vehicle was used in violence, this is what will happen when guns are gone, cars will take over as the primary weapon of choice; so lets ban cars too because as you and I know cars kill people, people don't kill people.

 

I think a big of the objection to Vista isnt the selling of guns as such but the overt and significant support of the NRA. I think most pragmatists would accept that the USA isnt going to ban guns but a more responsible attitude to how and who can buy them is required and the NRA has consistently stood in the way of any progress on a more reasonable position on this.

Avatar
Rapha Nadal replied to froze | 6 years ago
0 likes

froze wrote:

I say we ban guns because as you and I know guns kill people, people don't kill people.  And while we're at banning guns we need to ban cars too because just recently in Canada a van killed 10 people and injured 15 others, this isn't the first time a motor vehicle was used in violence, this is what will happen when guns are gone, cars will take over as the primary weapon of choice; so lets ban cars too because as you and I know cars kill people, people don't kill people.

Well, the NRA did ban guns at one of their recent shindigs where Mike Pence was in attendance.  Maybe it's a step in the write direction... 

Avatar
Edsonytic replied to froze | 6 years ago
1 like

froze wrote:

I say we ban guns because as you and I know guns kill people, people don't kill people.  And while we're at banning guns we need to ban cars too because just recently in Canada a van killed 10 people and injured 15 others, this isn't the first time a motor vehicle was used in violence, this is what will happen when guns are gone, cars will take over as the primary weapon of choice; so lets ban cars too because as you and I know cars kill people, people don't kill people.

I take it you are against banning guns because people will find another way of harming others?

The problem with that argument is that it doesn’t address the peculiarities that guns have in difference to most other objects: they are weapons, their main use is to exert  violence. The argument about any object possibly being used for violence willfully ignores that a car’s main purpose is transportation, sports equipment is also frequently used for violent means but again it is mostly used to do sports. Meanwhile firearms are mainly intended for some form of violence be it offensive or defensive, sure there’s sports shooting but that is not what they where created for nor is it the main thing people think off when they are mentioned.

In short, guns are first and foremost weapons which is why loads of people (including me) consider they should be heavily restricted.

Avatar
StewartM | 6 years ago
0 likes

Indeed, this is good for those of us who like our Giro products but could no longer see our money going - indirectly - to the NRA.

On the flip side, we shouldn't be too celebratory that the only reason they'll split with their cycling brands is if they don't make enough money. After all, the big quote from this article has to be "Vista Outdoor is excited about the potential of each of our core businesses, particularly ammunition".

So whilst my scruples can be somewhat appeased by them offloading Giro etc, it's fair to say on a macro level, the problem remains. FFS, what sane person gets excited by selling bullets to people?

Avatar
WashoutWheeler replied to StewartM | 6 years ago
0 likes

StewartM wrote:

Indeed, this is good for those of us who like our Giro products but could no longer see our money going - indirectly - to the NRA.

On the flip side, we shouldn't be too celebratory that the only reason they'll split with their cycling brands is if they don't make enough money. After all, the big quote from this article has to be "Vista Outdoor is excited about the potential of each of our core businesses, particularly ammunition".

So whilst my scruples can be somewhat appeased by them offloading Giro etc, it's fair to say on a macro level, the problem remains. FFS, what sane person gets excited by selling bullets to people?

BAE systems?!

 

Avatar
smcc1879 | 6 years ago
0 likes

Yes, good news indeed. I was eyeing up a pair of Giro shoes today, but wouldn’t have bought them because of Vista. I just hope explore some strategic options for CamelBak.

Avatar
zero_trooper | 6 years ago
2 likes

Good.

Latest Comments