Bill de Blasio, mayor of New York City, has defended the New York City Police Department’s policy of ticketing cyclists for road traffic infringements in the days following the death of a cyclist – saying they have to obey the law.
Earlier this month, Gothamist reported that NYPD officers were ticketing bike riders close to where cyclist Chaim Joseph had been killed by a hit and run driver a few days earlier. A passer-by took a video of the police operation in which one cyclist was knocked off his bike by an officer.
Speaking at a press conference yesterday, de Blasio said: "Whenever there is a fatality ... it’s a horrible situation, and we all feel it. That does not mean we’re going to stop enforcement.
"We’re going to be enforcing on anybody who we think puts other people in danger, period."
He added: "If we know there have been injuries involving cyclists and pedestrians, we take that seriously, too. We need cyclists to obey the law, and of course enforcement is a part of that."
However, Brooklyn Council Member Carlos Menchaca criticised the NYPD’s approach, saying: "I would like to know what forces an NYPD local precinct to start cracking down on bicyclists after a crash, especially a deadly crash.
"It's not only appalling, it's the wrong kind of message that you want to send to a community that is mourning."
Add new comment
9 comments
"Interesting to see how much more sophisticated bike storage options have become in such a short space of time"
they've always been more sophisticated than that.
I assume he was going for an ultralight set-up rather than exhausting all the options for carrying shit on the bike. A Carradice Camper and something up front have been enough to get me all over Europe.
IMG_0259.JPG
Assuming that Audax India Randonneurs uses the same rules as other Audax organisations, it isn't, as you describe it, a race. In fact, I've just looked it up and it most definitely isn't "Randonneuring is a non-competitive, self-supported, long-distance cycling activity typically enjoyed by experienced and serious cyclists."
The governing body of Audax, Audax Club Parisien, do not mandate helmets, but for some reason, Audax India does "It is compulsory to wear a helmet for the entire duration of the brevet." Quite why the Indian organisation has decided on this rule is beyond me, especially when helmets are not mandatory there, and the parent body doesn't demand them either.
have they defined what a helmet is? Conversely, has the Sikh religion defined what a turban is? Seems to me there could be some overlap.
Not that I wear, or approve of the mandatory wearing of, either.
Gosh, Mayor de Blasio really isn't terribly popular, is he? (read the Gothamist comments BTL).
He's clearly reading from the same sheet as some local authorities this side of the pond, though, isn't he?
Hit and run car kills a cyclist? Right - crack down on cyclists to make sure they're all obeying the law, then crack down on electric bikes, then sort out public transport (transit, as those 'Muricans call it), then sort out the Middle East crisis, then organise the cupboard under the stairs, then, sometime later, maybe look at what the motor vehicles are doing...
"hacking the brain to go beyond what we think of as our physical limits"
Inhibiting an important feedback mechanism that stops people killing themselves. Sounds like a good idea to me.
I don't speak Italian but I'm fairly sure the DS said something stronger than "this sport sucks"...
Seven years to the day that Sean Conway attempted to cycle around Britain or cycle around the World? Article says one thing, tweet says another.
No, it doesn't.
Electrical current to the brain.... seems legit.
this-seems-legit.jpeg