Not much, really; it's a good thing that we have a debate on active travel during an election campaign, but none of the parties' representatives moved on from what we already knew.
If you've been reading this, then clearly you care about what the various parties are pledging for cycling and walking.
But clearly, in what is widely seen as the most important general election in the UK since World War II, it's likely that there are bigger issues that may influence which way you vote - Brexit, the NHS and tackling violent crime foremost among them. There may also be specific issues local to you that sway your vote.
The one thing we can predict with any certainty about next week's poll - with all due respect to the Liberal Democrat and Green parties - is that it will be the Conservative and Labour parties that win most seats.
One or other may win a majority, but there is also a very strong likelihood of a hung parliament, resulting in a coalition government being formed; and whilst they weren't involved in tonight's debate (as mentioned below, Westminster funding for active travel only applies to England), the SNP, Plaid Cymru and the parties in Northern Ireland will have a say in the way that is formed.
There is clearly a huge gulf in ambition and political will between Labour and the Conservatives when it comes to funding active travel. The Green Party are of course onside, and the Lib Dems too are supportive - but will either have the clout as part of a coalition to push their agendas on the issue?
We may have more clarity a week on Friday; but if the last three and a half years of UK politics have taught us one thing, it's that it's wise not to hold your breath ...
Add new comment
6 comments
This burger chain gets it
EK79QGoW4AANeaq.jpg
I tuned in at the very point that the Tory confirmed the pitifully low spending figure per head. I tuned back out immediately. With the Tories on course for a win, I heard everything I needed to hear.
Going to point out that to turn a 40 mile stretch of the M4 into a "smart" motorway, which at it's most basic form means turning the hard shoulder into a extra live lane (OK, adding a fey lay bys and gantrys, though they do have to replace a fair few bridges) is costing £800 Million, which is more than £10 per person in the UK. For 40 miles of an extra motorway lane.
And the tories are spending £1.18 per person per year on active travel.
Which is not just cycling, and some local authorities seem to be able spend on space for motor vehicle traffic and car parks.
One more lane should fix it....
https://twitter.com/urbanthoughts11/status/1191295205187686400
I did try to watch the Active Travel debate, but the synchronisation failure after the first few minutes made it impossible, but I did listen. Mostly predictable, with all of them promising a bright future for cycling, except for the tory, who kept saying things like "where possible" which as we all know, means virtually nowhere. He also thought that £70m was going to transform cycling.
By far the best offer was from labour, with the greens a close second.
Thanks Brompton for making this possible.
The Tories unique selling point - "we don't even pretend to care."