A Queen’s Counsel who is also a keen cyclist is fighting a frustrating battle to have the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) and Metropolitan Police take action against a driver who threatened to kill him, despite having video footage of the incident.
Martin Porter QC posted footage recorded on his helmet-cam to YouTube (see below) and wrote about what had happened on his blog, The Cycling Silk, the same day the incident happened, Thursday 4 November.
Porter, who has also experienced difficulties in getting the police to respond to incidents reported by him on its Roadsafe website, comprehensively relates the problems he encountered trying to report last week’s incident, which took place in West London, on his blog.
When he contacted the police to try and report the incident, he was told that he needed to visit a police station in person to complete a form. But when he did so, he was initially told he could not report the matter since no-one had been injured.
After stating that he had been told to report to a police station by the Metropolitan Police itself and that he had video evidence, the officer concerned agreed to make a report, but refused to accept the CD with footage of the incident.
On his blog, Porter relates how the officer who recorded it as a “public order offence” asked seemingly irrelevant questions such as whether he was wearing a fluorescent jacket or dressed in Lycra, and erroneously informed him that video evidence was inadmissible if he wasn’t licensed to copy video, saying it would be thrown out of court.
Eventually, after repeated requests to the police, an officer at Chiswick Police Station investigated the incident, but yesterday Porter reported on his blog that no further action was being taken since the police and CPS, who by now had reviewed the footage, believed there was insufficient evidence to secure a conviction.
Porter, who has worked as a barrister for almost 25 years, becoming a Queen’s Counsel in 2006, and is also club secretary of Maidenhead-based Thames Velo, has now written to the CPS official concerned, requesting that the matter be referred to a Senior Crown Prosecutor.
In his letter, the text of which is repeated in his latest blog entry, he puts forward a compelling legal argument as to why he believes that the video provides sufficient evidence to secure a conviction, and that he “can think of no possible informed basis upon which anybody could doubt the admissibility of that evidence.”
The lawyer, who is a regular user of this website, told road.cc: "The evidence that a crime was committed is compelling. The problem may be that the threat is just not treated seriously because the offence was committed in a car and the complaint is from a cyclist.
"We live in a car culture where the misdeeds of motorists are met with a benign indulgence. Imagine if the threat had been made on the street when the suspect had some other means at his disposal to carry out his threat. I am disappointed that, as so often, aggression and bad driving around cyclists is not being taken as seriously as it should."
Clearly, the issue is far from resolved and we’ll bring you further updates as and when we have them.
In the meantime, perhaps the most worrying aspect of the episode from a cyclist’s point of view is that if a senior lawyer with a quarter of a century’s experience at the bar has this much trouble getting the police and CPS to treat an incident seriously, what hope is there for the rest of us?
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Lets hope he's successful. I had a car driver try to take me out on my motorbike last night after filtering to the front at the lights. Overtook me and cut across nearly taking my wheel. Overly aggressive drivers using vehicles as weapons, prosecution should be a no brainer but it seems two wheelers of any kind are not viewed kindly.
The cops come across as idiots in this sorry tale. The cycling lawyer sounds very clued up and I bet he has all the right inside knowledge to get a prosecution sooner or later.
If I wasn't a conscientious, law-abiding non-violent person I'd be tempted to consider that in similar situations I'd be better off taking such matters into my own hands
"We live in a car culture where the misdeeds of motorists are met with a benign
indulgence. Imagine if the threat had been made on the street when the suspect had some other means at his disposal to carry out his threat. I am disappointed that, as so often, aggression and bad driving around cyclists is not being taken as seriously as it should."
Quite. If someone can post a threat on Twitter with no obvious means or intent or way of telling whether they are serious and the CPS feel it good enough to go for prosecution then why not this?
Possible other avenue: private prosecution if CPS fail to take it up?
Add new comment
38 comments
I am aware of the roadsafe website contributing once to a satisfactory conclusion regarding a driving incident.
http://www.lcc.org.uk/index.asp?PageID=1773
However most of the time it appears to be an utterly futile exercise reporting bad and dangerous drivers.
It appears the police have very little interest in pursuing such matters.
Lets hope he's successful. I had a car driver try to take me out on my motorbike last night after filtering to the front at the lights. Overtook me and cut across nearly taking my wheel. Overly aggressive drivers using vehicles as weapons, prosecution should be a no brainer but it seems two wheelers of any kind are not viewed kindly.
See, if he'd issued the death threat on, say, Twitter then it'd be a far more serious threat... right?
Isn't there any precedence for action given the recent prosecution of our mate, the bottle throwing van driver featured on iPayRoadTax?
http://ipayroadtax.com/bottle-thrower/van-driver-throws-bottle-at-cyclis...
Clear evidence which the police have chosen to ignore. Please keep us updated - best of luck to the man in getting the violent sod prosecuted.
The cops come across as idiots in this sorry tale. The cycling lawyer sounds very clued up and I bet he has all the right inside knowledge to get a prosecution sooner or later.
The Met's response beggars belief.
If I wasn't a conscientious, law-abiding non-violent person I'd be tempted to consider that in similar situations I'd be better off taking such matters into my own hands
"We live in a car culture where the misdeeds of motorists are met with a benign
indulgence. Imagine if the threat had been made on the street when the suspect had some other means at his disposal to carry out his threat. I am disappointed that, as so often, aggression and bad driving around cyclists is not being taken as seriously as it should."
Quite. If someone can post a threat on Twitter with no obvious means or intent or way of telling whether they are serious and the CPS feel it good enough to go for prosecution then why not this?
Possible other avenue: private prosecution if CPS fail to take it up?
sounds like he's much more clued up than the CPS, so let's hope this one goes all the way.
Pages