- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Celia Ward falls into path of car after being confronted by Auriol Grey (via Cambridgeshire Constabulary and BBC News)Three years in jail for pedestrian convicted of manslaughter after cyclist’s death
* On 8 May 2024 Auriol Grey's manslaughter conviction was overturned at appeal. *
A pedestrian who aggressively confronted an elderly cyclist who was riding on the pavement, causing her to be killed after she fell into the path of a vehicle, has been jailed for three years for manslaughter.
Auriol Grey, aged 49, was convicted of the offence by a jury at Peterborough Crown Court last month, and returned there today for sentencing, where Judge Sean Enright told her she was “territorial about the pavement" and “resented” the presence of the cyclist reports BBC News.
Her trial in February heard that Grey had acted in a “hostile and aggressive way” towards 77-year-old Celia Ward, including shouting and gesturing at her, causing her to fall from her bike and into the carriageway on 20 October 2020 on a pavement alongside a ring road in Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire.
Grey left the scene before the arrival of the emergency services and went to a supermarket to do her shopping. She was arrested the next day, and claimed that Mrs Ward had been cycling “at high speed” and that she was “anxious I was going to get hit by it,” so “flinched out” with her left arm to protect herself.”
But passing sentence, the judge told her she had given a “dishonest account in interview” and that there had been “not a word about remorse until today.”
While the trial last month heard that Cambridgeshire Constabulary were unable to “categorically” ascertain whether Mrs Ward had been cycling on a shared use path, the judge said today in his sentencing remarks that it was a shared facility.
CCTV footage shared by Cambridgeshire Constabulary showed Grey, who has cerebral palsy and is partially sighted, shouting at Mrs Ward, described by her widower as an “experienced and competent cyclist,” to “get off the f*ck*ng pavement.”
Speaking in mitigation at today’s sentencing hearing, Miranda Moore KC said that Grey plans to appeal against the sentence and claimed that “she does not pose a risk or danger to the public.”
But the judge told Grey: “These actions are not explained by disability.”
Investigating officer Detective Sergeant Mark Dollard said: “This is a difficult and tragic case. Everyone will have their own views of cyclists on pavements and cycleways, but what is clear is Grey’s response to the presence of Celia on a pedal cycle was totally disproportionate and ultimately found to be unlawful, resulting in Celia’s untimely and needless death.
“I hope it is a stark reminder to all road users to take care and be considerate of each other.
“I want to take the time to acknowledge Celia’s family and thank them for their patience and dignity throughout the entirety of the investigation and trial,” he added.
In a victim impact statement, Mrs Ward’s husband David said: “After 53 years of happy marriage, Celia was taken from me in a most horrific way, leaving me with only my memories. She was kind, calm, careful, cheerful and competent in all that she did.
“Her death has caused me great suffering. We relied on each other, shared the same sense of humour and outlook on life, and enjoyed each other’s company. I miss her terribly.”
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- Sriracha 1 hour 43 min ago
https://velo.outsideonline.com/road/road-racing/technical-faq-bottom-bra...
- Simon E 2 hours 27 min ago
That's what we are told. Edge-of-town housing developments are progressing at haste here in Shropshire, all with the same car-centric, profit...
- ktache 2 hours 31 min ago
Or lezyne tubeless pro plugs. I've got a set, but had no chance to try them out. I want to use those mushrooms.
- chrisonabike 3 hours 12 min ago
That's a bit forward! But yes; pop up any time you like. Except when the buses have been at the bridges.
- TheUntypicals 5 hours 16 min ago
If businesses are suffering on Linthorpe Road it is entirely their own fault, most of the destination type shops moved out long before the cycle...
- giff77 5 hours 33 min ago
So where is the entitlement of wanting to get from A to B in relative safety? The city centre is dire regarding cycling infrastructure and while...
- whosatthewheel 5 hours 38 min ago
I live in a mostly flat town and can maintain 22-25mph. Makes no difference to drivers who still overtake frantically even only to slow down to my...
- wtjs 9 hours 40 min ago
And we can be sure that Police Scotland would be similarly disinterested...
Add new comment
52 comments
Police are requesting people to stop making un-informed postings about this incident.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-64835197
Maybe Road.cc mods could shut this thread down as it has become a target for just such bad faith actors.
I'm afraid all that BBC article does is raise the same questions about why the judge claimed it was a shared use path.
Why did the judge claim, with such certainty, that it was a shared usage path when no one else did? What was his evidence? Why hasn't this evidence been presented?
I'm sure the police do want to shut down this discussion, but (not of today at least) we don't live in a police state, and we have a basic right to scrutinize judicial rulings, as well as the conduct of the police, prosecution, defence and CPS.
So what Det SgT Dollard is actually saying is that the complete video shows MS. Grey pushing Ms. Ward into the path of the car.
Willt the trolls now shut up? Not sure, unfortunately.
Er no. No he isn't saying that. Because if there was a visible push, the video would have been released (the push, not the aftermath).
And also the BBC video raised more questions... If it's a shared path, and the BBC are literally stood on it to do their reporting, why did they not show the signage?
The suspicion is they didn't show the signage *because there isn't any*. And it certainly doesn't look like any shared path I've ever seen.
I therefore wonder if the council don't have some kind of culpability in this? It strikes me as odd that they couldn't tell if it was a shared path or not... Like it was meant to be designated as one but they forgot (or were too lazy) to actually do it.
Read. If you're able to.
What a shit show this site has become.
I should change my username to roadccistoxic.
Road.cc are you ever going to do anything about the trolls and pbus ?
Maybe you should change your username to "youareallcyberbullies"? Oh, looks like that one's in use currently...
Yeah, the provocateurs and distraction-merchants get more than tiresome over time.
Thinning out those here to play the attention and outrage game would be good. Dealing with at least one person who's been determined to be here for years and has experience gaming the system could take up time though.
Maybe road.cc is concerned that some mods would be a little ... over-enthusiastic? Overall I appreciate that "cyclists" eg. people who ride in countries where it's not encouraged can have strong and differing opinions!
Really, the best solution is to simply not engage or reply. They get satisfaction from knowing that they are being irritating. Debate and honing your logic against honest opinion is one thing and might even unearth some previously unknown aspect of the argument but as soon as you deem that reasoned debate is not their objective then best to ignore, even if that looks like they got the last word. It can be difficult to let it lie, but there is so much satisfaction in seeing the effort of an inflammatory post without replies beneath it. That must drive them nuts.
Not sure which poster, but one said the other day they had had enough of it. AlsoSomniliquism is on sabbatical again and I wonder if he will bother to return.
Admin should put these threads in a dead horses area leaving those who want to shout at each other to do that whilst the rest have a reasonable discussion.
HP not seen recently either but maybe they're having a holiday IRL? (Possibly to Snaizeholme,
https://www.yorkshiredales.org.uk/about/wildlife/places-to-see-wildlife/...
or maybe the Caledonian forest?)
Been guilty myself but yes, dragons lighting fires attract white knights to battle them, which keeps the dragons fighting - and round we go. The point under discussion - and even some villagers - lost to collateral damage.
Helmet row is tedious but we're stuck with that but it's every other thread now, and some character is at it even in the kit ones...
The vast majority of people in the country have similar opinions to those Martin and I have articulated on this thread. There has been a miscarriage of justice here.
You are in the minority, and on most other forums and websites, people with intolerances such as your own would be trying to censor your opinion. You should be careful what you wish for.
Personally I wish you would drive through a chrono-synclastic infundibulum. That way we would only have to put up with your toxic garbage once every 59 days, and then only for an hour. And give Martin a lift while you're at it.
Oh, has there been an opinion poll? Or are you justifying your nonsense on the basis that it agrees with the majority of the posters on "award-winning newspaper website" the Daily Mail?
Great to see in judgement and in police comments about sharing space. Time now to pass the message to motor vehicle users who are the most lethal users who are needed to massively up their game when it comes to sharing road space. The HC hierarchy makes sharing clear and responsible behaviours that need to be shown. If the courts gave this much gusto to sharing pavement space, why not do the same with road space?
Dear Mods.
Please close this to further comments. The trolling, with the repeated lying about actual facts (rather than differing interpretations or priorities), when there is a death involved, is just beyond tasteless.
Getting your kicks out of winding people up is one thing, but doing it whilst lying about a death is another. It is beyond bad taste.
First I have to give my sympathy to the friends and family of Celia Ward, not only for their loss but for the horrible publicity.
I've just looked at the Daily Mail page to read some of the profound and considered comments from the readers.
On the Front page the video clip which we have all seen is running in an endless loop.
Looking at it in this way shows Grey walking and gesticulating at the oncoming cyclist, as she is going out of frame she turns towards the road, her shoulder goes down, her hip comes out, then she turns back to continue walking along the road. That is a deliberate push!
If there is an appeal, get an expert witness in biomechanics to view this. The appeal court has the power to increase the sentence.
Yes, I just looked at that: there seems to be a fraction of a second more than the video posted on here which makes it appear (much more) likely that a push was involved.
Up here in bonnie Scotland, a woman was allowed to walk free after causing the death of a woman and injuring others.
She lost control of her powerful Range Rover and caused chaos before crashing into the group of people, who were all from the same family.
I do not believe that she showed any remorse or even apologised to the family of the lady she killed.
Yet, we have a pedestrian jailed for 3 years. Beggars belief, killing someone will driving is state sanctioned murder.
See also the Harry Clarke bin lorry case in Glasgow
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Glasgow_bin_lorry_crash
The Troll has no shame.
Which one?
Or are you privy to information we don't have, or a Unitarian in these matters?
I've made my own extension for Firefox that uses a bit of JQuery to add a "hidden" style attribute to any comment-container div that contains a span of class "username" with an "about" attribute that matches a list of users that I'm getting pissed off with. Whenever I Ioad the page, all thier comments are gone. It makes the site so much better.
.
English, please.
.
Ta.
.
I forgot to add you to the list. Thanks for reminding me.
BTW, the enter key on your keyboard is still broken.
That statement from her husband is so sad!
I've added this to my comments below but I think it deserves more attention to be drawn to it:
It should also be noted that the defence made no attempt to claim that it was not a shared pavement in mitigation, something they would definitely have raised if it was thought to be the case. Certain people who have, disgracefully, tried to claim that Mrs Ward was breaking the law when she tragically became a victim of a homicide should be deeply ashamed of themselves.
Why is it on the defence to prove that something does not exist? The prosecution should have the burden of proving that there was a shared path where the pedestrian was standing. If they cannot prove this, it did not exist. I certainly cannot see any evidence of a shared path, can you?
Be in no doubt, this is an unsafe conviction and a travesty of justice. I hope that the legal system proves itself fit for purpose by overturning the conviction and prison term.
It is without a doubt a tragedy for both parties here, I sorry for both the family of the cyclist and the pedestrian.
There are shared path signs on the sections of pavement leading up to and leading away from the scene of the incident and no signs indicating the end of a shared path. The judge has stated that it was a shared facility. There is no burden upon the prosecution to prove that it was a shared path, as this does not materially alter the fact that the defendant's aggressive actions were what caused the cyclist to fall into the road and be killed. That would be manslaughter regardless of the status of the path; strangely enough it is not permissible in UK law to kill someone because they've annoyed you with a minor traffic infraction. However, if the defence could show that the cyclist was breaking the law that would certainly be a mitigation in terms of sentencing; the fact that they did not even attempt to do so, and the judge's comments, demonstrates that all parties tacitly accepted that there was no evidence of the cyclist riding illegally.
Well well well, isn't this all a case of the pot calling the kettle black!
What would your opinion have been if the Blue Peugeot at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjU4cQRnPs0 had crashed after this cyclist shouted abuse for the minor traffic infraction that took place? After all, a judge agreed that there was insufficient evidence that the driver commited an offence.
Have you ever thought "there for the grace of God go I"?
Pages