Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

MEPs push for 30kph (18.641mph) limit on residential roads throughout Europe

20's Plenty for Us campaign welcomes proposals designed to reduce child casualties...

Members of the European Parliament are calling for speed limits on residential roads and single-lane roads without cycle tracks throughout the European Community to be reduced to 30 kilometres an hour in the interests of road safety. That would equate to 20 miles an hour in the UK, and the move has been welcomed by the campaign group 20’s Plenty for Us, which lobbies for that limit to be put in place.

The proposal is one of the key recommendations made by the EU Transport and Tourism Committee comprising MEPs from various member states drawn from across the political spectrum and which has the target of halving the number of road deaths and injuries on Europe’s roads by 2020.

In a press release outlining measures that it believes will help lead to that goal being realised, the committee recommends that a 30kph speed limit be introduced throughout the EU, and says that the result would be to cut the number of children aged below 14 who are killed by 60 per cent, and those who are injured by 40 per cent. It also says that children should be given lessons in road safety at the earliest possible opportunity.

While the recommendation for lower speed limits would be welcomed by cycling campaigners, the committee also says that cyclists “should be encouraged to wear helmets and reflective vests after nightfall” – whether that ‘encouragement’ extends to seeking to make them compulsory remains to be seen.

The news follows a recent decision by Minister for Transport Norman Baker to make it easier for local authorities to put 20mph zones in place.

Rod King, Founder and Campaign Director for 20’s Plenty for Us said: “We have been working with MEPs for some time to show how the 20’s Plenty for Us campaign in the UK is attracting wide political and community support as an effective initiative to reduce danger on our roads and develop the right conditions to make our streets better places to be.

“This recommendation is recognition of not only the success of lower speeds in the countries already adopting wide area 30km/h limits and that, as evidenced in the UK, it is possible to “retro-fit” our streets with lower speeds that are accepted by communities and result in reduced casualties.

He added: “We now have over 5 million people living in towns, villages and counties where the local authority has adopted a Total 20 policy. 20 really is Plenty where people live and this new recommendation of best practice from a European perspective reflects the importance of this move towards a safer and more pleasant street environment for us all.”

20mph speed limits have already been introduced in a number of British cities including Bristol and Liverpool which this month announced plans to cut extend 20mph zones to 70 per cent of the city's residential streets, other cities looking at 20mph limits include Cambridge, Norwich, Brighton and Bath. In the past one of the stumbling blocks for their introduction has been the reluctance of some police forces to commit the manpower necessary to enforce them. Given the cuts in both police numbers and to speed camera partnerships enforcement is still likely to be an issue. However, the idea has proved overwhelmingly popular with the people who live in such zones and their proliferation should help to get the message across that driving at inappropriate speeds on residential streets is socially unacceptable.
 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

37 comments

Avatar
londonplayer | 13 years ago
0 likes

Reflective vests at night? Can I throw away my cycling lights then? *confused*

Avatar
adscrim | 13 years ago
0 likes

Given the number of cars on the road, requiring red flag carriers could sort the unemployment figures.

Avatar
FatAndFurious | 13 years ago
0 likes

Much more of this and we'll be back to the guy running in front waving a red flag.

Avatar
cactuscat replied to FatAndFurious | 13 years ago
0 likes
neildmoss wrote:

Much more of this and we'll be back to the guy running in front waving a red flag.

i agree. people should be allowed to travel as fast as they please to the next junction/pedestrian crossing/bottleneck/traffic jam. after all, that's what personal freedom is all about, eh.

 39

Avatar
FatAndFurious replied to cactuscat | 13 years ago
0 likes
cactuscat wrote:
neildmoss wrote:

Much more of this and we'll be back to the guy running in front waving a red flag.

i agree. people should be allowed to travel as fast as they please to the next junction/pedestrian crossing/bottleneck/traffic jam. after all, that's what personal freedom is all about, eh.

 39

No, not as fast as they please. But limited to 20mph?

Following that car limited to 2nd gear and constrained to 5mpg? I'd rather not.

Are _you_ really going to freewheel down that incline you would otherwise be easing along at 25mph?

It's just too far. You can keep cutting limits, but there will still be injuries and deaths, even if it is just trying to leave your own garage (no disrepect intended).

Avatar
handlebarcam replied to FatAndFurious | 13 years ago
0 likes
neildmoss wrote:

Much more of this and we'll be back to the guy running in front waving a red flag.

Great. Full employment.

neildmoss wrote:

No, not as fast as they please. But limited to 20mph? Following that car limited to 2nd gear and constrained to 5mpg? I'd rather not.

If such a law were brought in it might finally halt, and hopefully reverse, the ever increasing and completely unnecessary power of modern cars. Manufacturers would have to design cars that can comfortably and efficiently travel at 20mph.

neildmoss wrote:

You can keep cutting limits, but there will still be injuries and deaths

Basic physics says deaths would be reduced and injuries would lessen.

Avatar
spen replied to FatAndFurious | 13 years ago
0 likes
neildmoss wrote:

Following that car limited to 2nd gear and constrained to 5mpg? I'd rather not.

Both my car, a Nissan Micra and the Astra td I drive for work can comfortably do 20 in fourth gear with the engine running at little more than idle - I fail to see why you would be in second, unless you're driving a clarkson mobile

Pages

Latest Comments