What a shambles this whole thing has been...
First, parked cars, moving traffic including a large bus, and wayward spectators threatened the peloton's safety, then the next day was marked by protests and neutralisations, and finally the third day of the tour in the Iberian mountains was cancelled by the UCI after overnight negotiations with the pro cyclists' union CPA.
But the horror wasn't over yet (is it ever over?). On Monday, we reported that the "sexist" race organisers faced severe backlash after referring to pro riders as "girls" and "spoiled children" for cancelling the tour.
> “They think they’re on the Tour de France”: Backlash against “sexist” race organiser who called pro riders “girls” and “spoiled children” over cancellation due to safety fears
The Cyclists' Alliance, made up of former and current female pro cyclists has released a scathing statement, condemning the organisation of the race and expressing their disappointment.
"After day one, we understood that the organiser assured teams that the safety situation would improve. This was not the case. Day two was equally unsafe.
"Despite the concerns being expressed by riders and teams, the organisers were reluctant to cancel the race after the conclusion of day two. The procedure for evaluating the safety of the race was not clear.
"Furthermore, responses to teams’ concerns during the race appeared, at times, dismissive and disingenuous. The organisers have subsequently been reported in the French media as saying that the riders, teams, and the UCI are at fault.
"TCA expresses disappointment that these antiquated attitudes about rider safety and women’s sport still exist. In light of these events, we urge the UCI, national federations, UCI race organisers and UCI road cycling teams to renew their commitment to ensuring modern and safe working conditions for all UCI riders."
> Tour Féminin des Pyrénées stopped amidst rider safety issues
The TCA pointed out under the UCI regulations, ot is a standard expectation across all disciplines that "all traffic shall be stopped on the course as the race passes through".
It said: "Professional female cyclists expect these conditions are standard and should not be expected to compromise on safety just to have the opportunity to race. Equal standards of safety for female athletes is the bare minimum.
"The race organisers for the Tour Féminin International des Pyrénées boasted an impressive prize pot of €50,000 and live coverage on GCN. It is evident that they failed to allocate money to ensure a safe race which complies with UCI objectives and regulations."
The TCA also criticised the decision-making procedure and how it bestows power in the hands of the organisers, failing to acknowledge the "vested interest of the organiser in maintaining the status quo i.e. continuing the race and not spending money to make the race safer for riders".
The cyclists' representative body added: "We call upon the UCI to urgently reconsider these aspects of the protocol, in light of the events at the Tour Féminin International des Pyrénées, in order to ensure greater independence, free from conflicts of interest, when difficult decisions around race safety need to be made.
"After the conclusion of the race on Sunday, we have seen riders speaking up to emphasise that they want to see races which prioritise safety first, then media exposure, and then prize money – in that order.
"TCA expresses gratitude that no rider was severely injured, or worse, during the event, and hopes that the major stakeholders involved in women’s racing can all work together to ensure there is no repeat of events like this. For any riders with outstanding concerns relating to race safety, we invite you to connect by e-mail: info [at] cyclistsalliance.org."
"The right to life, and to safe working conditions is a universal human right."