I think it’s fair to say that Australia isn’t the most bike-friendly place in the world (I know, I know, glass houses, stones, and all that).
Just last month, the country’s only Tour de France winner Cadel Evans spoke out about the dangers of cycling on Australian roads, after two 16-year-olds were arrested as part of an investigation into two horrendous hit-and-run incidents in Melbourne, which saw two cyclists mowed down as one of the car’s passengers filmed the collisions while “laughing”, before uploading them to social media.
The two cyclists were seriously injured in the collisions, with one 51-year-old suffering spinal injuries and expected to need “lifelong” rehabilitation, while a 72-year-old was left with a fractured spine.
> “What kind of disturbed, inhumane individuals do that?”: Double hit-and-run suspects were “laughing” after mowing down Melbourne cyclist
Shortly after the hit-and-runs left the Melbourne cycling community shaken, 2011 Tour winner Evans told a local newspaper that Australian drivers “lack awareness and concentration” and have “bad attitudes” towards cyclists, and that building more cycling infrastructure is just one part of the puzzle with “more education about cyclists’ rights to use the roads and longer, more comprehensive driver training” needed.
> Cadel Evans calls out Australian drivers' "bad attitudes" towards cyclists after two riders seriously injured in deliberate hit-and-runs filmed and uploaded to social media
So, it only makes sense that a recent Sky News Australia segment on road safety would be titled ‘Are Australian cyclists annoying us?’, right?
Responding to a newspaper column deriding cyclists as “entitled tossers” (good to know they have those kinds of columns Down Under, too), the segment helpfully included retired New South Wales police sergeant – and Ironman competitor – Glenn Corick, who (for the most part, anyway) defended the actions of the majority of Australia’s cyclists.
“This kind of opinion has been around forever,” Corick said. “I’ve lost about seven friends over four decades of riding bicycles, I’ve seen it all, I’ve seen both sides of the camp, I’ve been on TV doing arguments about it for a very long time.
“Look, 99 per cent of all people are road users – cars, bus drivers, everybody and cyclists – do the right thing. It is just this small minority that continue to do the wrong thing. But that also doesn’t give people the right to be aggressive to that small minority.
“Because a car versus bike, a bike loses every time – and like I say, I’ve lost seven mates.”
However, Corick’s advice for increase safety for cyclists, rather bafflingly, seemed to purely focus on the actions of cyclists themselves.
“All I can say is education, and cyclists – stay off the roads in the peak hour and use your common sense and find your places to ride, don’t put yourself in harm’s way.”
> Two 16-year-old boys arrested by police in Australia after horrendous hit-and-run incidents saw two cyclists mown down
Oh, dear. And that particular guidance appeared to open the floodgates for some good ol’ anti-cycling bingo live on Sky News.
“You’re absolutely right,” said the station’s host Erin Molan, “And the thing that frustrates me most – and while the safety of everyone has to be paramount – I was in the city yesterday… and we sat in traffic for twenty minutes for one road, one line of cars, and there were two bike lanes empty, not one cyclist in them.
“And that annoys me, that turns me off cyclists, who are really doing a wonderful thing by getting out there,” she added, failing to realise that she might have made her event in time if, you know, she’d travelled by bike.
> Cyclists fear heavy fines for drinking from water bottles if “draconian” careless cycling laws are introduced in Queensland
“I think we’re talking about a couple of bad apples here,” interjected former Australian special forces commando (I’m not making this up) Wes Hennessey – and no, he wasn’t talking about the ‘bad apples’ who are driving around Melbourne, deliberately mowing down cyclists.
“Some cyclists flex the laws, and that’s where they get this bad rap. They’re people out exercising,” he added, seemingly ignorant to the fact that not all cyclists are of the leisure and recreational variety.
“And if they abide by the rules of the road for cyclists, then drivers just need to be a little bit patient. Is it really worth running over someone for the one minute you’re going to gain in time? Aggressive behaviour shouldn’t happen – we’ve all honked them from time to time, but just stay away from them.”
Errr, I think that’s a positive conclusion? Well, it seems like it’s the best we’re going to get from Australia and Sky News, anyway…
Add new comment
18 comments
Just saw these on bikinginla, I don't think I'd seen them here.
Eight men arrested in murder probe after cyclist killed in 'hit and run'. Thames Valley Police launched a murder investigation after a man was struck down by a motorist and reportedly attacked before the driver fled the scene.
Police hunting masked biker 'terrorising' cycle paths in Midlands town. The bike has been seen speeding down a number of cycle paths in Tamworth, Staffordshire.
Note: "biker" is on some sort of e-motorcycle.
Taxi driver has snapped at Cycling Mikey! Nope, it's not really Mikey. Gleeful comments from the usual suspects on the Twitter/X cesspool.
The simple trick that nailed £130,000 bike theft gang in a single day... police use bait bike to infiltrate and take down bike theft gang. Sorry for Daily Mail link. They must be so conflicted cheering this on.
Police warning to cyclists after stolen bike turns up nearly 4 years later. Surrey police suggest using one of the following free and easily accessible websites.
Two cyclists who tried to save a man's life are being urged to come forward by police. The man and woman went to the 25-year-old's aid after they found him near Sunshine Trail cycle track, Alverstone, on the Isle of Wight, on 1 February.
"Our only question is: Why?"
Riding bikes with your friends: fun
Drinking beer with your friends: fun
Dicking about in a way that isn't harmful to anyone: fun
The beer bike seems like it ticks all three boxes
The only thing I can't get behind is the attractive bartenders to ogle for a fee part, otherwise, sounds like a good time.
Can't wait to see the beer bike go up and down Park Street
I've done one here in the US. They're motorized. It weighs about a tonne, so at least 200 lb / 100 kg per pedaller.
"Bristol gets its first ‘beer bike’ – and our only question is: ‘Why?’"
So they can charge you an exhorbitant amout (£450 for 60 minutes) to drink shit beer.
I've got a better idea, get on your bike and cycle to any one (or more) of the following: Small Bar, Wiper & True, The Kings Head, The Seven Stars, Little Martha, Moor Beer, The Barley Mow, Left Handed Giant Brew pub. Bristol has so many good watering holes, even Brewdog and 'Spoons would be a better experience.
RE: Are there too many people using the cycle lanes?
That's impressive - looks almost like a giant chain gang!
Got a ways to go though....
Whilst I admire Carlton Reids dedication to documenting these cycle tracks and maybe my local track is just a bad outlier example.
But its clear just on that one local example there's alot of confusion about its history and provenance, which then leads to more confusion about the whole areas cycling setup and before long there's an entire new history being written.
Fwiw I don't use the track except in extremis, because its frankly rubbish.
But because it exists, because the council believes its good enough, because they hear people from mainstream cycling praising what a great thing it is to have, we'll never get any improvement to it.
It will remain this archaic callback that could simply have been a path along a road that otherwise would have been mud, that in no way encourages or promotes anyone to cycle along it.
I believe you're correct about the prediction but I'm not so sure the "people from mainstream cycling praising it" makes much difference (albeit sometimes galling).
For example I'm cynical about e.g. previous incarnations of Sustrans (I should add, for some time appearing much improved) apparently lending their support to any "cycling infra" (and thus the National Sign-off Network). However ... did that even change much? To be fair to them Sustrans (or certainly the many folks who've volunteered) still presided over some generally useful projects as well as getting their logo many places. And perhaps the councils minded to do anything would have delivered rubbish and declared it "world-beating" regardless of whether Sustrans approved or even were shouting for something better?
It seems decades of vigorous campaigning are unfortunately necessary but certainly not sufficient. What are the levers you feel that could be pulled to effect a better quality result (or anything at all)?
probs because of the confusion on the history and the spread of infra around it, its become a bit of a poster child for Sustrans and Active Travel England locally, no council wanting to create more cycling infra is going to suddenly go "Oi Boardman Nooo!!! you might think this cycle track is brilliant but we're going to dig it up and replace it with something different".
So it never gets included in any new schemes proposed, its literally treated as this is the kind of stuff we should aspire to as its already perfect, even though Im sure if you proposed the exact equivalent today, the same organisations praising it, would say it fell well below standard
Erm - has he seen what the majority of Australian roads look like? The only bits that seem busy are the areas immediately around the major cities. On his logic, they should just dig up all the others…
You have forgotten the golden rules:
If any road is not completely free flowing at all times, then we need another road.
If any cycle lane is not completely full 24 hours a day, then it should be ripped out.
I think it's motornormativity. Drivists get so used to roads being congested with all the large vehicles (typically with a single occupant) that they don't recognise that an efficient cycle track won't have congestion with anything less than European cycling levels (and even then, the congestion is only at junctions/lights).
You want to be on a large-larger ring combination, to minimise link-rotation friction in the chain. And you also want to have a straight chain-line for as much as possible, to minimise side-plate friction.
So makes a lot of sense on a flat TT.
More low-grade clickbait content, trying to drive engagement through outrage.
Plenty of people here who like to furiously froth over it.
Virtually your only comments on this site are to say how crap you think it is. Are you sure that doing so, and indeed coming here at all if you dislike it as much as it appears, is the best use of your precious and limited time on this planet?
Well, it clearly worked as you couldn't resist responding.
Am I a terrible police chief?
No, its the victims who are wrong!