Phil Gaimon, former pro rider for Garmin-Sharp and Cannondale (now EF Education-EasyPost) has spoken out against the idolising by some people of Stefan Küng's bloodied and bruised end to what could have been a fantastic showing at the European time trial championships yesterday.
Switzerland's time trial specialist Küng had been in contention for a third European TT champion title after passing the second intermediate time check in third place, less than a second off Wout Van Aert’s time, though almost half a minute down on the flying young British rider Josh Tarling.
> Former UCI chief calls for crackdown on “crazy” head-down time trialling after Stefan Küng’s bizarre crash straight into barriers at European Championships
However, towards the end of his ride, Küng – riding in the extreme, head-down aero position favoured by most modern time triallists – misjudged the slight change in direction on the road and failed to spot the row of encroaching barriers in front of him.
As far as images having the power to evoke strong emotions in fans go, the images coming out of the incident were certainly shocking and jarring.
But Phil Gaimon, who's had his fair share of experience with concussions and crashes during his pro cycling career, has now spoken out to dissuade fans from idolising this sort of stuff and called for more rider protection.
He wrote on Twitter: "I’m seeing way too many people calling this brave or hardcore. I'm not blaming Kung at all for doing what he's trained for (and his head just took a hit), but there's nothing inspiring or bad ass about this photo.
"I remember crashing in a category 3 race, catching back on, winning covered in blood, and feeling proud and tough for it. I also remember introducing myself to a former teammate at the Tour of California team presentation (he of course knew me well and thought I was joking).
This was in 2013, just two months after Gaimon had suffered a bad concussion, and in between he had been second overall at the Tour of Gila. He said that it "worked out apparently but scares the shit out of him in retrospect", adding that multiple head injuries at the same time "can make you a vegetable".
He continued: "I think it's a combination of getting older and how science has progressed on concussions but I'm really not afraid of broken bones or road rash at all anymore, however I am scared of a brain injury that comes back to haunt me when I'm 60.
"Respect your brain and spread the word on concussions. I’m not going to give medical advice but look into warning signs and recovery protocols."
After the incident yesterday, former UCI president Brian Cookson called on cycling’s governing body to crack down on the "crazy trend" of riding head down in time trials. He argued that the crash was a result of Küng’s head-down riding style, which he claims should be banned by the sport’s world governing body.
That had already sparked some debate, with people pointing out that the top three riders in all UK time trial championships would have to be disqualified if they applied that rule.
But now perhaps Gaimon's point calls for another discussion, and it's one we have already had earlier this year during the Giro: Does pro cycling needs to ditch its obsession with "hardness"?
> Opinion: Why pro cycling needs to ditch its ‘hardness’ obsession
GCN commentator and everybody's favourite pro cycling analyst Carlton Kirby, who was on the mic during yesterday's race said at the time of the crash: "Concussion protocols and the like.. that’s a terrible picture of a real athlete and he’s finishing the job he’s almost programmed to do.
"It was going so well and it’s ended in disaster, and it’s straight to medical facilities once he crosses the line. Such a shame for Stefan Küng, what a brave rider!"
If commentators continue to label actions and images like these as "brave" and a "real athlete", do you think cycling fans, sitting from the couches of their homes can let go of the "hardness"? Do we all need a moment to realise that athletes don't need to put their lives on the line, or do you think cycling should go on as it has in the past, complete with strongman personalities and idols made out of stone?
> Podcast: Have pro cyclists ‘gone soft’? Perceptions of elite sport (and us mortals) discussed + Simon samples Drum & Bass On The Bike!
Let us know what you think in the comments!
Add new comment
57 comments
...
Chapeau (or is it Fedora, or RHEL?)!
Best of the day - I bet you'd have received more but for 504 Gateway Timeout...
Weather woman Laura this morning was warning about the butt end of storm Nigel's imminent arrival...
Drove back from the garage and got stuck behind a very slow cyclist going uphill. I gave them a good beep to speed them up.
When she got home I'm not sure she was entirely convinced that I was encouraging her to pedal harder !
I don't know all the stats to be fair but it feels like cycling is becoming one of the most dangerous sports out there!
With what's at stake, TT'ers are gonna ride with their head right down, at the road directly below and not that far ahead, they know by various means where major obstacles (roundabouts, turns) are, but the inset barriers at Drenthe were poorly marked, especially when they're part of a what appears a long clear and open straight - they are way less obvious.
In such cases where barriers suddenly come in sharply, why don't they just put temporary spray paint or strong adhesive markings on the actual road 100 meters, then 50 meters out from the obstacle to help warn riders to alter their line?? Or even some alarm/sound warning on approach?? They use lots signs along the route anyway but these can be up high which is not conducive to TT riding - road markings or sound warnings would help a lot.
I know it's the same for every rider, but it's too easy/simple and arguably hypocritical for people to say that they shouldn't keep their head down, since every stakeholder wants to see exciting competitive races, super fast times, and riders at their very best; and with what's at stake and the money now in cycling, the riders/teams are gonna do everything they can to win, seeking every advantage they can, striving for optimal aero, so these organisers have a responsibility to protect the riders and do all they can to make it safer.
"Bad a**"? Obviously I can't speak for the entire readership but I reckon most of us could probably handle seeing the word "ass" written in full - particularly as it is anyway in your screenshot of Gaimon's tweet...
Yes, nowt wrong with Equus asinus.
Shimano are recalling Ultegra and Dura Ace 11-speed cranksets. In North America at the moment, but may be world-wide https://bike.shimano.com/en-US/information/customer-services/recalls-and...
Shimano are recalling Ultegra and Dura Ace 11-speed cranksets. In North America at the moment, but may be world-wide https://bike.shimano.com/en-US/information/customer-services/recalls-and...
That's cracking news!
That's cracking news!
That's my boy. Keep the pressure on (not on the cranks, obviously)
Shimano are recalling Ultegra and Dura Ace 11-speed cranksets. In North America at the moment, but may be world-wide
This is a sensible commercial move- people like me, who have always been very pleased with Shimano kit, can now consider Ultegra again- or any other bonded Shimano product
"A petition to oppose the blanket 20mph speed limit in Wales has reached a record number of signatures, however people have pointed out that most of the signatories do not live in Wales, and some not even in the UK!"
So very much like the opposition to LTNs or any other measure to make your neighbourhood more civilised to live, play and work in. There has to be some method of weeding out disinterested parties from petitions like that.
To be clear, the vast majority of people in Wales support 20MPH zones, just not how it has been done. It is a mess, signage that is incomplete and totally conflicting, there seems to be no clear rules as to why some roads that are semi rural and go on for miles with fields on both sides are now down to 20mph. It is a complete joke. Local councils were supposed to do the work to get exceptions but have been completely useless and have not done or submitted this for review (there also seems to be no common framework as to how this was to be assessed!) The police will soon be out with their cameras dishing out fines and points to a cash poor and fed up populus. It's even hard to ride a bike as now some are driving around at 15MPH and your only opinion is to overtake down the outside, risky and this does nothing for car to bike rider relations. If it is to be done then do it properly and make sure you have all the boxes ticked before you go ahead, it can't be that hard can it?
Sometimes it's better to make the change, then fix the issues, than try and identify all the issues up front. I think this approach applies here.
Whilst some effort has been put into identifying which roads need to stay at 30mph, there are just so many and some that you will only find out that 20mph is perhaps a bit slow once you try it.
It's also very unlikely that a change to reduce the limit is going to make things more dangerous, whereas delaying the reduction in the limit might have cost lives and created injuries that would otherwise have been avoided.
[duplicate]
I'm not sure in this case. If it doesn't work well to start with the political momentum to scrap it will grow quickly. I can imagine this will now be a key wedge issue in the next Welsh elections.
I've driven through the centre of Cardiff today and the new limits are definitely confusing a lot of drivers, plenty of random braking going on. Some roads alternate between 20 and 30 multiple times for no apparent good reason.
The situation isn't helped by a lot of the new signs being obscured by foliage, council doing half a job as per.
Mostly agree. For one, the political shift has already happened as you mention. This isn't new though - in fact it seems that the Westminster Conservatives have been headed in this direction across a range of "environmental" issues for a while now. It's certainly been since the London by-elections (ULEZ fear, Rishi the Motorists' Friend).
It's maybe a tricky one to pull off in that they're effectively running against themselves and their policies in the past. People have short memories though...
Not sure if this is just a desperate effort to stop Labour following them around (Starmer was still doing that post by-election...) or because they think it will have particular appeal to a particular demographic?
As for confusion - people still haven't caught up with the Highway Code changes yet... (Albeit that wasn't legal changes).
The public space needs to be extremely simple and standard for people to use. Similar spaces should have similar rules. (Like "cycle paths are always coloured {x} - everywhere in the UK" - where {x} is any colour clearly distinct from roads, footways and other spaces. Grr...)
Children should be able to understand and use it. After all, almost no-one gets "training" after leaving primary school except for passing the driving test (once per lifetime currently). So any infra should be self-explanatory, with as few signs / markings as required (the UK is dreadful for visual clutter), and it should guide people to the "correct" way of using it.
However - we're still fighting for any such changes both in general and in detail in each case. Councils are struggling to get up to speed. (Previously they only had to *talk* about this kind of measure - usually as a reassuringly jolly "ho ho don't worry, we're hardly going to lower speed limits everywhere!" kind of way). Given that the government has recently given the impression that it's at best postponing lots of these changes I'm betting plenty will just wait and see.
If you can't bring yourself to stick to the speed limits where they apply then please do everyone else a favour and send your driving licence back to DVLA in Swansea.
You'll have to accept that the delivery might take a little longer as the post van is doing 10mph less for a while, but you really won't notice the difference in the scheme of things 😂
Is that, like, the Earth police, or police in some parallel universe where traffic regs are enforced?
You know, I reckon there might be an alternative to making a risky overtake down the outside if we think hard enough about it…them whatnots on the handlebars aren't just there for changing gear, they can be used for slowing down as well when necessary.
You have whatnots on your handlebars! I always knew cyclists in London were posh but this is exceptional!
https://www.sellingantiques.co.uk/536612/georgian-mahogany-four-tier-wha...
Well where do you keep your sherry decanter, humidor and dish of hors d'oeuvres whilst cycling, pray?
My whatnots are mounted on a pannier rack for improved handling and aerodynamics.
I was taken aback by part of the description
This "most people not in Wales" claim seems to be untrue on the petition signatories.
The map analysis says 95% in Wales.
However, I think there is no verification on the address - so a lot of false postcodes may be going in.
Think you might have mis-read the BBC article linked.
Seb Goldin, chief executive of RED Driver Training, supports the 20mph limit and wants to "help encourage similar updates to speed limits across the rest of the UK".
Mark Jones, of Bzams Bed'z is responsible for the quote about "destroying companies and putting so much stress on people".
Pages