Tower Hamlets Council’s decision last month to remove most of the borough’s low traffic neighbourhood schemes, despite a series of consultations showing that residents were in favour of retaining the traffic-calming measures, has been criticised by a group of local headteachers, who have penned an open letter to mayor Lutfur Rahman urging the notoriously anti-active travel politician to reverse the decision, which they branded “an attack on thousands of children’s futures”.
Last month, we reported that Tower Hamlets Council voted to scrap the walking and cycling initiatives introduced by the previous Labour administration in 2021 in Columbia Road, Arnold Circus, and Old Bethnal Green.
A similar Liveable Streets scheme on Canrobert Street, however, was retained, while a bus gate restriction in Wapping was kept due to “exceptional” support in a consultation last year.
“As headteachers of Tower Hamlets schools, we have a duty of care to all the young people in the borough and we are shocked and dismayed by the way that Mayor Rahman’s decision on 20 September deprioritised the health and safety of students in Bethnal Green,” the letter, addressed to councillor Mushtak Ahmed and signed by 86 primary and secondary school headteachers, said.
This isn’t the first time, meanwhile, that Rahman’s pro-car platform – since his re-election last year, the Aspire Party leader has rolled back a series of initiatives aimed at reducing motor vehicle traffic and promoting active travel, which he claims have increased congestion and contributed to more CO2 emissions in the area – has been opposed by local schools.
Last October, children, teachers, and parents installed their own Les Misérables-style barricade outside a school in Bow in protest at the council’s decision to put an end to School Streets initiatives in the borough, designed to restrict the use of motor vehicles outside schools at drop-off and pick-up times – a campaign that eventually saw Rahman reverse his decision.
> Children take to the barricades to save School Street
And in their open letter to the mayor, they accused the council of ignoring the views of local schools when it came to ripping out the borough’s “popular and successful” Liveable Streets measures, a decision they say would bring the borough “back to square one”.
The letter said: “Five of the most affected schools (Oaklands, Lawdale, Elizabeth Selby, Virginia, Columbia) wrote jointly to the mayor on 30 January 2023. In the letter they outlined why they supported the current street layouts in Bethnal Green, their concerns about the proposals to reintroduce thousands of extra cars per day in front of their school gates, and their belief that there are ways to improve the current layouts, for example by introducing more controlled crossings.
“The letter did not receive a response, neither the mayor nor any member of his cabinet went to speak to the schools, and it was not included in the consultation reports appended to the officer report for the 20 September decision. This is an unacceptable omission in the decision-making process.
“Mayor Rahman promotes the interests of Tower Hamlets’ young people through his free school meals policy for secondary schools and in his decision to retain the 33 ‘school streets’ across the borough.
“However, his decision to remove the current street layouts in Bethnal Green, and his failure to take any steps to reduce vehicle journeys in the borough, are an attack on thousands of children’s futures.”
> “Extreme, undemocratic, and dangerous”: Council scraps majority of low traffic neighbourhoods – despite “overwhelming” public support for cycling and walking schemes
The headteachers noted that, according to the council’s public health team, only 23 percent of children and young people in Tower Hamlets are physically active and that all schools in the area have council-approved School Travel Plans, which aim to encourage cycling and walking to school, and reducing car use.
“So, infrastructure which encourages walking and cycling to school is a powerful tool for the council to use, yet the mayor has decided to spend millions of pounds removing the most successful active travel infrastructure in the borough,” the letter said.
The council’s own equalities impact assessment, the teachers pointed out, also flagged during the decision-making process that scrapping LTNs would have a particularly negative effect on young people, due to the “increase in road danger, pollution, and discouragement for walking and cycling”.
> Police urge against scrapping low traffic neighbourhood, saying it reduces crime
The letter concluded: “While the immediate effects of this decision will be felt most significantly by schools within the low traffic neighbourhood in Bethnal Green, the impact will be felt across the borough.
“Children and young people will see that their daily safety and their long-term health is less important to the powers that be than the interests of people passing their schools in motor vehicles.
“More children will spend more days doing short journeys in cars, undermining their fitness, and increasing their risk of obesity. And they will all have friends in neighbouring boroughs who are much happier walking and cycling to school, where the councils have ongoing programmes to install and improve active travel infrastructure.
“How is it rational to feed and teach our children well, mandate that schools should encourage walking and cycling to school, and then remove the infrastructure which makes it safe and easy for young people to travel in a healthy way every day?”
Add new comment
35 comments
Aside from the fact if Vine, or I don't know...Mikey had pulled that pass there would be all kinds of excuses made, is it actually impossible for road.cc to publish an article about Neal without resorting to ad hominem?
"It feels like it’s been a while since everyone’s favourite driving instructor/YouTuber/son of a four-time European Cup-winning full back popped up on the live blog, but don’t worry – Ashley Neal is back after a quiet summer and is once again causing controversy within the cycling community… and this time he’s on a bike."
This adds nothing to the article except show the petty mindedness directed towards anyone how does't follow the accepted black and white narrative of cycling good/driving bad.
Maybe for balance road.cc can start referiring to Vine in every article as;
"everyones favourite gameshow host/daytime TV pundit/brother of Edinburgh fringe winning comedian"
Just a thought.
Can't say I agree with conflating MGIF cyclists and cars, one scratches paint and the other kills and maims.
Also he's safer if he gets in the cycle box (assuming he isn't trapped in the filter when the light changes).
Still would have been better to do it slower.
Yes but he is a driving instructor and son of a footballer don't you know!!! Hes wrong dammit, wrong wrong wrong!!
The Ashley Neal filter was an intentional MGIF to show the driver behind they made a pointless overtake (which was actually a close pass IMO). The driver's position trying to block the ASL filter lane is poor too. He freely admitted it was a bit tit-for-tat in the video. To be fair, I may have done the same myself!
I have been watching his content and his cycling is improving.
Steady on! We'll be critiquing his
saddle heightsock height, demanding he start confronting the Ronnie Pickerings of this world and cheering for him to blow through reds even after they're established next...Oh, he's still got a way to go! It's all still leisure riding, pootling around town/trails on an e-bike. No shopping trips by bike, rush hour commuting or road bike rides out into the countryside.
Apparently he's got an 'analysis' video of a cyclist getting knocked off on a roundabout coming up soon. Should be an interesting one?!
Well I will certainly give it eye (if I get reminded by e.g. it appearing here, I don't follow him).
He gets at least half a point for revisiting his Edinburgh cyclist being hit video (linked from this road.cc post) as it's not easy - and indeed really unusual in this day and age - to say "I might not be completely right".
However he then undid some of this by returning to the theme of individual responsibility after having noted the multiple issues with the design. And individual responsibility does sometimes seem to be downplayed for motorists - for example in a couple of his examples of "innocently killed" in the original vid...
When I last checked he also had some odd views on overtaking / passing cyclist. I've seen videos where he appears both lacking a bit of pragmatism in favour of a rigid "letter of the guidance" approach AND also giving the nod to what seemed to be "crack on past, it's fine" where it sensibly wasn't.
Then there's the "give them a friendly toot".
Overall though he seems to have useful things to say to drivers about better driving around cyclists (albeit that's not hard). And indeed better driving in general - sadly not a given with ALL driving instructors!
I watched part of his link up with Ogmios, but I think Ogmios is better by himself as he can pursue his little stories without having to talk with a passenger.
Ashley generally gives out good advice, but he's not perfect and often it's instructive to examine where you disagree with him and why. There's very few cyclists/drivers out there that are perfect, so it's good practice to identify your own and other common mistakes as that can help avoid collisions (which is the entire point of roadcraft).
As regards tit-for-tat MGIF overtaking - it's a bit of a guilty pleasure with me. I know it's not the best idea, but at least I'm not endangering others with my behaviour (probably just as well I don't drive).
Exactly the kind of thing Vine does and gets praise heaped on him from all quarters. Hmmm.
https://road.cc/content/news/ashley-neal-divides-opinion-use-horn-290765
Observing the letter but not the spirit...
Found out about my wife's zero harm training this evening. Workplace based looking risk mitigation.
The trainer asked "you are in a car approaching a speed camera, what do you do ?"
Of the 10 there they nearly all said slow down, no one said (as I did) carry on at the same speed ( as you aren't speeding already). No one pointed out the risk of a pile up from someone slamming on and the trainer did not pick up on that or the speeding in the first place.
No wonder that 20 and 30 limits are only adhered to by a minority.
They still can't seem to get the overtaking diagramme right. FTFY.
This is excellent but I can't help thinking there's a bigger issue with your improved version...
It really is the worst kind of MGIF
https://newsthump.com/2023/10/21/weather-now-so-bad-even-audi-drivers-obeying-the-speed-limit
Weather across Britain has been so bad over the last 24 hours that even Audi drivers are only doing 70 on the motorway, according to reports.
Police forces across the country, report revenues have fallen by ‘hundreds of thousands in a day’, as storms forced Audi owners to discover gears lower than fifth.
That County down video I wouldn't class as a 'Sorry, didn’t see you there' (oblivious mistake), but more of a SMIDGAF !
TBH, it's the sort of driving I had assumed was now taught as standard... That sort of thing happens all the time, regardless of whether I have a headlight on.
In this case, I think the assumption is that the cyclist will quickly hop off onto the footway, possibly while also bowing to their Betters.
If I'm on my own I'll try and stand my ground in situations like this. Worst is when it happens when I'm in shepherding my small kids, teaching them to ride out the gutter then some dickhead drives at you like this.
Regarding the scrapping of LTNs around schools - the kids have only got themselves to blame if they don't vote in the people that will protect them. It's called democracy and if you didn't want Rishi Seven Bins Sunak to champion the all-conquering motor car, then you shouldn't have voted for him.
to be fair, they may or may not have voted for Mayor Rahman. It's hard to know how he counts the votes.
Allegedly.
Not allegedly. I think you mean the Corrupt Mayor Rahman Who Has Previously Been Convicted Of Electoral Fraud
Any news on when the post count will be back?
Half term and all that.
They're getting Lutfur Rahman in to tally them up.
I've just spent the last 5mins looking at EmilyCee's TL and still dont have a clue whether she is a parody account or not - about 60% confident that shes parody/sarcasm.
Pro-trans and anti WEF - I dont think I've ever come across that particular intersection of the Venn before.
She also seems quite keen on mass murder. In another tweet, she wants Putin to use nukes to improve things.
Seems like a nice
ladypsychopathShe's not listed with the RCVS as Emily Cee, although there are several Emily C.......
Looks to be a common or garden nutter
Don't understand. Is *anyone* pro-WEF?
It isn't only track cycling that the media ignore, it's all kinds of cycling, but especially utility cycling, which in media terms, has been cancelled for decades.
Quest is showing the track thing at some strange hour.
Pages