While catching up on all the bike racing going on over the Bank Holiday weekend – the highlights of which included a first ever British win at the Tour de l’Avenir courtesy of Joe Blackmore and the Vuelta’s GC race being blown wide open – I came across the inaugural edition of the West Bohemia Tour, a new four-day stage race in the Czech Republic for U23 riders and development teams.
And let’s just say the race has a few teething problems to sort out.
On Saturday, concerning footage emerged from the tour’s third stage – a hilly loop starting and finishing in Klatovy, and won by Soudal Quick-Step Devo’s 19-year-old Lars Vanden Heede – which highlighted some distinct and horrifying organisational problems that need to be ironed out before next year’s race.
The footage, filmed by a sports director who was following the lead group, showed the riders turning right at a junction onto another road, where no marshals – usually stationed at junctions to prevent members of the public from straying onto the course – were in place.
“They take the bend full gas,” the DS can be heard saying in Dutch in the video. “There is nobody here to stop traffic. Nobody.”
To make matters worse, the DS then filmed several occasions on which unsuspecting motorists found themselves driving straight towards the racers during what was supposedly meant to be a closed road event, leading to some shocking near misses on bends and on the race’s narrow roads.
“Lads, don’t do that! Don’t take the inside line Don’t do this!” the directors in the car shouted during one especially hairy moment on a blind left-hand bend (where many of the riders, doing what they normally do during well-organised events, made use of the entirety of the road, only to find a driver on the other side of the corner).
“Look at this car approaching!” the director again shouts as two drivers – and a leisure cyclist – pass the bunch in the opposite direction. “Watch out! This guy comes flying down this road at 120kph! Folks, watch out!”
And on another narrow, twisty section, he exclaimed: “Here are more cars! Of course he has to brake because it’s so narrow here!
“Of course cars will come down here. This is just an open main road! They are using the full width of the road, no lads, stay on the right!”
Responding to the video on social media, one user claiming to be the race’s doctor, said that 11 police motorbikes, 20 marshals, and two police cars were present at the race, which was eventually won after all that by Lotto Dstny’s Victor Vaneeckhoutte.
“That’s small gran fondo numbers,” one cycling fan responded to the claims.
“Those numbers seem far too low for a race that can be spread out over multiple groups,” replied the Domestique cycling account.
“Clearly something went massively wrong because the original 10-minute clip we saw did not show a single organiser vehicle or a single marshal.”
> “Cycling is wonderful, but it is a very fragile sport”: Controversial organiser says the Tour des Pyrénées “is over”, after stage race marred by safety “chaos”
The worrying, chaotic scenes at the West Bohemia Tour over the weekend brought to mind the controversy which marred last year’s Tour Féminin des Pyrénées, the French stage race plagued by a range of safety issues that even prompted the peloton to refuse to start the third and final stage.
Last June, the UCI decided to call off the final stage of the CIC-Tour Féminin International des Pyrénées – only the second edition of the three-day race – following two days of protests from a peloton concerned for its safety.
On the first stage into Lourdes, won in a sprint by Ashleigh Moolman-Pasio, members of the public were seen driving on the course, metres away from the riders at times, and parked cars and trucks littered the final kilometres while spectators wandered onto the roads.
A day later, the second stage to the Hautacam was then neutralised to the foot of the iconic summit finish after the peloton complained of race motorbike riders creating hazardous conditions – leading the race organiser to criticise the protesting riders, who he described as “spoiled children”, comments for which he later apologised while also claiming it is “impossible” to completely close the roads in France for a bike race.
And you thought your local Saturday morning races were sketchy…
Add new comment
26 comments
Surely the most important measure of how safe a city is for cycling, should be the amount of good quality cycling infrastructure it has?! I don't know what it's like to cycle in all of the cities on that list, but I do know that Derby should not be anywhere near the top of it, or on the list at all for that matter!
Or just count the "votes" - just work out the modal share for cycling (beware - there have been accusations of people fiddling these figures...)
If cycling is safe and convenient, people will cycle. The caveat is necessary because - like Milton Keynes or Stevenage - if it's relatively safe to cycle but really convenient to drive people will drive. If cycling is "safe" but there's nowhere secure to park your bike, people will drive / take public transport.
This was a survey of the UK. You missed a key word, "connected", the small pockets of good quality cycling infrastructure typically amount to nothing, because they are rarely connected or go anywhere useful.
I'm curious about the number of reports on fixmystreet. Is a high number good (as it might indicate lots of cyclists to report issues) or a low number (council is fixing issues before they get reported (personally, I don't think this is possible)).
"Surely a city safe for cyclists needs fewer repair shops". Weird comment. Regardless as to whether Bristol is safe or not, if it's safe and more people ride, then they need more repair shops.
This channel has many comments that, effectively, mock new and occasional cyclists. Most people have little to no experience of servicing bicycles and don't have the tools or, quite likely, any history of fixing mechanical things. Nowadays, lots of people in multiple occupation houses and flats with nowhere to store tools or work on a bike. Having space and tools is a luxury indicating we can afford to own or rent such space and occasional use equipment.
Days when I could ride home after evening work and replace a broken rear wheel spoke in large hall of rented flat in Swiss Cottage are long gone. Affordable on a first job with a church project salary then, not now! In London, bike shops converting to repairs only: no profit in selling bikes. Lots of people need maintenance
I'm not sure what this comment relates to on this page - or is this a general complaint?
However I'm sure that there are some comments which come across as that - this site probably does have a slight "road" or even "competitive cycling" focus. But "many"? Citation needed...
You've brought this up before and I've the same comment - we could definitely do more to provide storage (see end). And there are lots of other measures we could (and should) take which would make this potentially liberating form of transport much easier to access. I still don't understand where some of your assertions are coming from though.
Yes - if you're in the "precariat" - on benefits or (perhaps worse) not and relying on minimum wage / gig / grey economy jobs then everything is going to be a fight. And you might have little time / energy, and stuff will likely get broken / lost / stolen more frequently. That's not just bikes though.
Nowhere to store tools? Odd comment - anyone who cycles probably carries all the basic bike tools with them on their bike. They'd almost all fit in a sock...
Can't afford tools? Basics - a pump, tyre fixing bits, couple of Allen keys / spanners? Probably in shops / online for around 20 quid. Dunno about London but where I stay (Edinburgh) there are quite a few charities / fix your bike or set up up schemes / places providing second-hand stuff for really cheap / Gumtree and Freecycle where these things appear.
Yes - bikes have a wide range of "standards" - but (mostly) the basics are ... basic. Particularly if you haven't got money for a "fancy" machine. If you want Park Tool or you're needing to braze a frame / face a bottom bracket then, well, yes. But if I had nothing but a matress on the floor at that point I'd not be after tools, I'd be looking for a different bike, because they can (sometimes sadly) be got for 100 quid or less...
Now I've no doubt in London my salary would barely rent me a cupboard in some parts. And by its nature (biggest city in UK by a long way, capital of England, long history of people from everywhere moving there for work) London likely has far more people in HMOs (at least in parts) than elsewhere.
FWIW when I stayed in such shared houses (not in London) I kept my bike in my room or the shared hall and did fettling there or outside. Not ideal but it kept me (basically) running.
However the general point that our housing stock, building guidelines and planning policies are not set up to provide properly for cycle storage etc. I heartily agree with. (Here's what we could be doing [1] [2]). And we still don't even seem to be following current guidelines - such as they are. I see new flats going up in Edinburgh apparently without such. (TBF these may have been signed off prior to regs, or maybe the cycle storage is just very well hidden).
True (ish - algthough I'd suggest it's a pretty weak proxy).
Pretty sure you're reading something in to a throwaway blog post line that just wasn't there now. I doubt the thought process went much beyond "dangerous roads would result in more incidents, meaning more things needing fixing, meaning more bike shops". It's flawed logic, but I don't see any mocking of anybody there (except those responsible for the lazy 'study').
Hey, we're in luck! The road.cc discussion based SEO content generator algorithm* has requested a cyclist toolkit based article!
https://road.cc/content/feature/beginners-guide-building-your-first-bike...
* has anyone else noticed that sometimes, stuff being discussed in the comments pops up in an above the fold article, often within hours?
re: safest city I guess the idea is the more you use your bike the more often it needs to be repaired. So the more bike shops the more people using their bikes. And people who don't feel safe cycling are less likely to use their bikes.
It's all those vigilante cyclists.
Not sure if this is HP or brooksby !!
https://youtu.be/rTUyRgddVj8?t=121
It's not me, I'm afraid
I think I've seen that clip before - absolutely perfect example of the motorist in the hairdresser car only looking for other motor vehicles, isn't it? I love how they stopped to exchange insurance details, too.
Ironically, had the cyclist not ridden through the earlier red light, the hairdresser car would have cleared the junction, and he'd have been perfectly safe and unmolested... Actions & Consequences...
You're right: and if the hairdresser driver had chosen to take the bus instead there would have been no conflict. And if a butterfly six miles to the south west had not flapped its wings then a moving tree branch might not have cast a shadow, which distracted a lorry driver, who forced the hairdresser driver to overtake. And… And… Actions and consequences…
He was in the cycle box - you can see the top of the helmet. The text on that clip also says he didn't run the red light.
Yep, perhaps Bigfoz meant that if he had cycled through the red light he would have been safe from "hairdresser car"
The "hairdresser car" would then have collided with the cyclist in the oncoming lane instead.
Not me, though I do cycle along there fairly often
As the article states the idea is just marketing.
Bristol named the UK’s “safest cycling city”
I want to see where these well maintained roads are
It's hard to imagine what the rest are like.
To make matters even worse, the DS was clearly filming using a handheld device whilst driving, which doesn't exactly enhance the safety levels for the riders or the other drivers using the road…
I'd love to see a copy of the risk assessment for the West Bohemia Tour…
It's not uncommon to have races on open roads in mainland Europe.
When I lived in Germany, I entered a race that was partially on a military training area range road. Armoured vehicles would often pass in the opposite direction. The road would be covered in mud from tracks as they turned into the road from training areas. It was manic. You get railway crossings - not uncommon even in pro classic races. Mostly drivers slow down as they see the peloton but if you're on your own or in a small group you're a bit exposed to traffic.
To close roads would be too cost prohibitive and most of the time these races go off without any major incidents.
The article says that it was supposed to be a closed-road event, though…
Yes, but I'm highlighting that races still happen with cars on the same road. It's not a strange concept.