This actually passed us by at the time, thanks to all the dramatic racing in circles going on in the velodrome (and my lack of interest in daytime TV), but earlier this week Tom Pidcock embarked on his mandatory post-Olympic gold medal tour of the UK’s television studios.
And, even by the alarmingly low standards of morning television hosts interviewing sportspeople, it resulted in one particularly excruciating, cringe-inducing interview on Good Morning Britain.
> Tom Pidcock recovers from puncture to win second consecutive Olympic mountain bike gold in thriller – and annoy the partisan home crowd, who boo British star across the line after late winning move
Picture the scene – Pidcock’s tired and emotionally drained from the highs and lows of a torrid Tour de France and winning one of the most dramatic mountain bike races in recent years, becoming a double Olympic champion in the process.
He’s then, amid a whirlwind of interviews and media appearances, plonked on a sofa – tracksuit top on and gold medal around his neck – facing Kate Garraway and self-referential tweeter, Gangnam Style-enthusiast (and former government minister) Ed Balls, whose knowledge of bike racing is, shall we say, minimal.
Garraway opened things up with this typically inane, but ultimately harmless question: “Has it sunk it yet, that you’re here wearing that around your neck?”
What Tom should have said: ‘What, being intently started at by Kate Garraway and Ed Balls like I’ve just done especially well in my GCSEs or progressed through to the next round of Britain’s Got Talent? No, that hasn’t sunk in yet.’
What Tom actually said: “It’s a good question, it’s always a difficult question – has it sunk in yet, what does it mean?”
Balls, interjecting: “It means that all of your life you’ll be a gold medallist.”
What Tom should have said: ‘Well, Ed, I’ve been an Olympic gold medallist for three years, already, since I won the mountain biking in Tokyo. Come on man, do your research.’
What Tom actually said: “Yeah, well this was my biggest goal of the year to win in Paris, so it’s a big relief for sure.”
All of our faces during that interview
Balls then boasted that he watched Pidcock’s winning race “live, on the TV”, before adding that “I don’t know a huge amount about mountain biking”. I’m shocked, shocked I tell ya.
“But I said last week on the show that it looks quite easy, that anyone can do it” he continued, “But of course it’s not easy.”
Patronising ignorant comments, check. Balls is on fire.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
“Someone showed me a clip of that before I came on, actually,” Pidcock laughed, finally breaking the awkward atmosphere that engulfs a room when two people interview an elite athlete like they’re a child who’s completed a nice drawing.
That was followed by a bit of muttering and mumbling from Balls, before the former Labour minister and mediocre if rather game dancer asked another poorly conceived question about how Pidcock prepares before the race in order to beat the “French guy”.
“Errr, practice laps,” Tom replied.
That’s more awkward than the time Ed’s infamous ‘Ed Balls’ tweet. Maybe he should stick to interviewing Yvette Cooper, eh?
(Alex Whitehead/SWpix.com)
Though it’s fair to say that some of the replies under GMB’s social media post showed as much appreciation for how hard it is to race a bike as ol’ Ed did.
“We used to do that all the time as kids, it’s hardly an achievement,” said James Dawson, who must have had some fun as a kid racing Tour de France stage winner for an hour-and-a-half around a steep forest.
“Mountain biking as a sport is questionable, but then so are many others,” John added.
Sounds like a challenge, Tom.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
Meanwhile, in an altogether more prepared interview later that morning on Sky News – which actually featured quite a lot of in-depth analysis of the race’s key moments (unbelievable, I know) – Pidcock touched on the hostile, “feisty” reaction he received from the French fans at the line following his perfectly executed dive bomb around the tree to beat home favourite Victor Koretzky.
> “They didn’t boo the rock that made me puncture”: Tom Pidcock says “it’s a shame” French crowds booed epic Olympic win – as rival insists divebomb “part of racing”
“I finished and the whole crowd was booing – they were booing me while I was racing, but also at the finish,” he said. “There’s no place for that at the Olympics really. On the course I kind of understand it, but once you finish you should respect everyone and what they’ve done, and the lengths they’ve gone to prepare.
“And that’s the race, you should respect everyone. So it kind of put a dampener on there. It saddened me a little bit, as I couldn’t celebrate with the fans, as they weren’t celebrating with me.
“But at the end of the day, it doesn’t matter to me – I came to win the medal. And I gave them a chance, didn’t I?”
Add new comment
16 comments
“But I said last week on the show that it looks quite easy, that anyone can do it” he continued, “But of course it’s not easy.”
Unlike interviewing: which looks easy and is easy, but beyond Mr Balls.
This was a fairly lame example of it, but good interviewing is actually pretty hard to master - there aren't that many people who are actually really good at it.
No, but this was terrible, and it was a fairly easy subject, it wasn't exactly Frost vs Nixon.
There's an awful lot of waffle/filler in the 'Tom Pidcock is interviewed on TV' story.
Definitely. The story here is more cringeworthy than the interview itself.
Sad death of cyclist in a collision in Settle, North Yorkshire
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgedy2d01wlo
I've ridden this road lots of times. I'm sure the truth will emerge, but this one is, compared to the typical winding lanes, an arrow-straight road with good visibility of entering/exiting vehicles.
Sympathies to the family.
Had to be a range rover
https://youtu.be/1m3brJ5_Frc?t=51
Close pass followed by brake check, then bizarre lecture about using the road - "You could have knocked your son off his bike as a result of our close pass" and it is against the law to cycle 2 abreast.
Do either of them actually have a valid licence ?
Ah, yes! The entirely useless 'words of advice' from TVP that tell the offender: do what you like, we don't care- reminiscent of LancsFilth, before they abandoned even pretending to take action over offences against cyclists, or any other road traffic offences for that matter
It's the way the boot opened...
Ah the classic too impatient to pass safely, but acres of time to spend having a pointless chat about it afterwards.
It would be refreshing if one time a driver fessed up and said they knew they were close passing you but just didn't care, instead of this self justification of importance and made up rules they all go for instead.
I was on the way to a TT last evening...marshalling: too old, fat and slow to take part.... when my heart was gladdened to see 2 kids aged about 12 cycling along what is a reasonably major road. It was good to see them on the road doing what they seemed to enjoy.
That was until some prat in a twat car decided that they could not wait for a gap and close passed them, forcing one of them onto the pavement.
Sadly, I wonder whether these kids will still think its safe for them on the road with arseholes like this around.
Children are our future. If we treat them like this, then watch out when its their turn in charge!
Cycling two abreast is apparently illegal, but stopping on a double yellow line to remonstrate with the cyclist is perfectly fine.
Whilst that clip is dated (uploaded to Youtube?) 7th August 2024, I'm sure I've seen it a fair while ago.
Possibly even via Road CC.
Watched it up the point the woman joined in and decided that my blood pressure's high enough today, thanks (so closed the window)…
Presumably the woman was driving and she should be banned before she kills someone. The most frightening thing is that they both appear to believe what they are saying. Re-education required, but not in the sense of Mao's Cultural Revolution. Just explain the facts to them, slowly, in words of one syllable, and let them drive again in a fairly short period, say ten years.
Anyone so misinformed (I know there's a tsunami of misinformation out there, but this is on a different level) should never have had a licence in the first place. Hopefully someone will recognise them and put them straight on a few things, and I'm not sure the police words of advice are sufficient.
mark1a