While Katy Marchant’s horror crash at the Lee Valley Velodrome on Saturday night appears to have reignited the debate on track racing safety protocols – particularly when it comes to trackside barriers seemingly ‘protecting’ spectators from the action on the boards – cycling’s decision makers also continue to be locked in an ongoing discussion about safety on the road.
And, after a 2024 road season marred by a horrendous high-speed crash at the Itzulia Basque Country and the tragic deaths of Swiss junior rider Muriel Furrer and Norwegian pro André Drege during races, Groupama-FDJ boss Marc Madiot has claimed “there’s only solution” that would make the sport safer: “slow down the bikes”.
The outspoken French manager’s suggestion, which he says could emulate Formula 1 by “saving lives” while not hindering the spectacle on display, comes just two weeks after Tour de France director Christian Prudhomme argued that crashes such as the one in the Basque Country in April – which left two-time Tour winner Jonas Vingegaard with serious injuries, hindering his eventual yellow jersey defence – are caused by riders “going too fast”.
> EF boss Jonathan Vaughters slams “fat cats who have never raced so much as a child’s tricycle” after Tour de France director blames crashes on “riders going too fast”
Speaking at the annual general assembly of the association of race organisers (AIOCC) in Italy, Prudhomme said: “Beyond the behaviour of the athletes and the work of the organisers, it is absolutely necessary to reduce speed by appropriate measures: the riders are going too fast.
“The faster they go, the greater the risk and the more they endanger themselves and others.
“We already said it here last year: our car and motorbike drivers no longer have a safety margin! Imagine the consequences if one of our drivers, subjected to too much pressure, lost control on a mountain descent or when racing through a built-up area.”
And while the Tour director’s stance has drawn criticism from the likes of EF Education-EasyPost manager Jonathan Vaughters, who branded the comments “absolutely infuriating” and dismissed Prudhomme as one of the sport’s “fat cats who have never raced so much as a child’s tricycle”, it has nevertheless attracted some degree of support from Vaughters’ fellow team bosses, namely Groupama-FDJ chief Marc Madiot.
Marc Madiot (ASO/Pauline Ballet)
In an interview with Le Parisien, Madiot, who’s managed the French squad since 1997, said that slowing down the technology on offer is key to creating a safer environment who “don’t want to understand” the inherent risks they face during races.
“The equation is impossible,” the two-time Paris-Roubaix winner and expert car door panel beater told the French newspaper.
“The guys are riding faster and faster on terrain where everything is designed to slow down the vehicles. And downhill, it’s worse than anything.
“And since a lot of guys don’t want to understand anything, there’s only one solution: slow down the bikes.
“Formula 1 has never stopped restricting cars. Not only has it saved lives, but its spectacle has lost nothing. Honestly, is a race at an average of 48kph less exciting than one at 55kph?”
> "Profound safety problem" in elite cycling, finds report... but riders union president says it's "getting safer"
The great leap forward in bike technology over the past decade – which promoted one smiling French “champion” to tell Le Parisien that the bikes “almost ride by themselves” these days – and its effect on safety was also noted by France’s philosopher cyclist Guillaume Martin, who’s set to move to Madiot’s Groupama-FDJ team in 2025 after five years at Cofidis.
“The equipment allows you to go faster,” Martin told the paper. “I have the impression that the bikes break every time you fall, which means they are more violent.
(ASO/Billy Ceusters)
“We can do like in F1 where everyone has the same tyres. That way we wouldn’t have any differences in grip. We can choose a brand that isn’t hyper-efficient with tyres that make you go a little slower. From one tyre to another, the speed can vary by 3kph.”
> Tour de France pro slams "heavier" Look bike for poor performance, but Cofidis team unimpressed and point out same "cutting-edge equipment" has been ridden to numerous big Grand Tour wins
Meanwhile, other suggestions for reducing speed, such as increasing the UCI’s 6.8kg minimum weight for bikes, were dismissed as “stupid” by Groupama-FDJ’s performance director Frédéric Grappe.
“Heavier, the bikes would go faster downhill. There are other avenues, however,” Grappe said, before calling on cycling’s governing body to act on certain aero-focused rider positions on the bike.
“The centre of gravity has been moved forward,” he said. “The saddles are too high and the handlebars too low. As a result, riders’ arms are too straight and they can no longer bend their elbows when it comes to reacting quickly to a problem.
“Seeing riders skidding off the front wheel on a descent is completely abnormal. Everything is done to get themselves into trouble.
“Smaller handlebars are also making turning more complicated. And another consequence is that, in a peloton, the guys are closer together. That increases the danger.”
(SprintCyclingAgency)
Also speaking to Le Parisien, Kiko Garcia, the general director of the International Association of Cycle Race Organisers, argued that a “lot of things are possible” on the bike tech front to help make the sport safer.
“We race organisers can’t secure everything and we ask for help from the bicycle industry and other bicycle families,” he said.
“But the very good news is that equipment manufacturers are not at all closed to the idea of building slightly slower bikes. The will is common. I’m sure that changes will be decided soon.”
Add new comment
46 comments
From Wikipedia: "The panel produces a shortlist that reflects UK sporting achievements on the national and/or international stage, represents the breadth and depth of UK sports and takes into account 'impact' within and beyond the sport or sporting achievement in question."
That last clause is the key, someone like Luke Littler has clearly had a massive impact on the public consciousness to the extent that even someone who doesn't follow darts like yours truly knows his name, I can't tell you the name of the other person to whom you are referring. Similarly, if it just went on sheer sporting excellence in the calendar year then Harry Brook should be the cricketer nominated, not Joe Root. Ironically that criteria makes it more surprising, rather than less, that Mark isn't included, but on the general point it doesn't make the list a joke just because not every nominee is the world #1.
Wikipedia also states its an award for sporting excellence, I just dont see how they picked the runner up from the biggest darts competition in the year, whilst completely overlooking the actual winner.
anyway ITV have put out an alternate SPOTY list which seems alot more grounded in reality.
I think a lifetime award is more appropriate for Mark Cavendish. He won one stage of the TDF, which is no more impressive than other UK cyclists such as Sarah Storey or Tom Pidcock. Joe Root had a terrific summer, but poor series in Pakistan. Maybe Gus Atkinson would be a better cricket nomination. However, I think Keeley Hodgkinson is the one sportsperson who has been outstanding in her field and performed brilliantly in every race she ran.
Jimmy Anderson should also be getting a lifetime achievement award too imo
They did the same to Nicole Cook, she was the world number 1 and won the women's Tour de France - the final list was 20 so the BBC made it 21 and included Nicole on the list at the last moment, nobody at BBC had any idea who she was and she was the world number1!
They did the same to Nicole Cook, she was the world number 1 and won the women's Tour
Another unsupported hero- like Beryl Burton
Which is even odder when you consider that, by my reckoning, he's one of only two on that list who were actually a genuine sir at the time they won it.
Mark won in 2011 and was knighted this year...by my reckoning only Mo Farah of that list had been knighted at the time he won.
Doh! You are, of course, right. And that's what I thought originally when I started looking at it - it was because he wasn't beknighted when he won it, it having only just happened. Not sure at what point I confused myself into thinking it happened earlier. 🙃
The skinny tyre mob could take advice from the knobbly brigade and invest in body armour?
Think I'm mad? Well I think it is insanity to ride along a tarmac road at 60kph with nothing between my arse and the road than a micro thin layer of lycra. How much of an aero impact would carefully designed, abrasion resistant fabric panels or thin kevlar patches have on performance compared to the massively improved skin protection? Body armour technology for DH MTB has improved dramatically, it is so much lighter, more flexible and breathable than even a couple of years ago. Why not protect your shoulders, elbows, hips at least from impacts and abrasion? Crashes are going to happen at all speeds but look at how GP Riders bounce up from a 200kph crash thanks to kevlar suits and body armour.
No one thinks your mad but it would have to come from the top and it would slow them down. Aero is king and that sort of thing would likely slow them down enough to make a measurable difference between those using it and those that weren't so no one would use it.
There is a massive difference between making strong body armour for MTB/motorbikes where aero and weight aren't a concern vs road cycling where it is.
I think its unlikely to slow them down and in fact I would give it a year before some enterprising person like Dan Bigham came along with a Aero mod that makes you go faster... a rear neck brace for example.
I'm a bit surprised that we're not seeing some experimentation in reinforcing the lycra to to minimise gravel rash.
I seem to remember one clothing brand was experimenting with putting Dyneema (the same material Specialized make their S-Works shoes upper from) in vulnerable areas a year or 2 ago. Haven't heard anything more though.
“The saddles are too high and the handlebars too low. As a result, riders’ arms are too straight and they can no longer bend their elbows when it comes to reacting quickly to a problem." - This is an interesting observation, when trying to understand root-cause. Lots of previous suggestions on brake-discs causing accidents due to lots of power and locking-of-wheels, but I do wonder if this position theory is a real factor? interesting. I also wonder when/if we'll see long-term health impact on the pros in a few years, from the mega-aggressive riding positions they have to spend hours in, as of today? I have friends who are young, and have serious back issues, despite fittings.
Slow down bike racing? But how on earth could that be done?
(Also available in modern editions e.g.: https://youtu.be/BRzUI3ABM08?t=36)
Pages