Dan Bigham is the new British Hour Record holder after surpassing the distance set by Sir Bradley Wiggins back in 2015. The 29-year-old powered his way to 54.723km in the Grenchen Velodrome in Switzerland this afternoon, 197m further than Wiggins' distance.
Instead Bigham, who rides for British Continental outfit Ribble Weldtite Pro Cycling, opted for a strict pacing strategy and some bold kit choices, partly informed by his high-performance cycling kit business Wattshop and coaching role with the Danish track cycling team.
Despite being ten seconds down on Wiggins' benchmark early on, he managed to hold his pacing, overhauling the deficit and extending his advantage as the hour ticked down.
Hour Records - a great weekend for this pair of Joss Lowden and Dan Bigham as they both achieve their goals for the Women's and Men's Hour records - Here is Dan's record (British) confirmed in pictures
Talking to The Cycling Dane Youtube channel at the finish, where the ride was live streamed, an ecstatic Bigham said: "It was actually really enjoyable.
"I am sure I had a few people scared early on. It is quite a scary way to ride it because you know you have got to pick it up, but I paced it really well.
"I felt I was on a good one, earlier in my warm up and out on the track. I had target splits for every five minutes so I knew exactly what time gap I needed to be at. After 20 minutes I thought 'I can nip at this a bit more'.
"I was just hitting 16.00s and 16.10s [lap times] for the last 25 minutes and I was just chipping away at the record. I thought it would bite me at some point, just at those last five minutes I was like 'and now it hurts'."
Bigham was greeted by his partner Joss Lowden at the finish, before his distance was ratified by trackside officials. Lowden herself yesterday broke the outright women's Hour Record with a distance of 48.405km in the same velodrome.
Due to issues surrounding drug testing, Bigham could not have broken the UCI Hour Record, even if he had surpassed Victor Campanaerts' world best distance of 55.089km. As he does not ride for a WorldTour or UCI Pro team, Bigham is not elligible for the UCI Testing Pool, something he estimates would have cost around £7,000 to enter at his own expense.
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.
Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.
Not wanting to pour scorn on what is a fantastic achievement , but if a relatively unknown rider - and certainly not world class Time Trial specialist can beat Wiggos record based on technology and pacing then it should mean any more established rider , say Dennis Rohan could absolutely destroy the current world record. But if technology is able to play such a huge role and not just marginally it kind of makes a mockery of the whole record in a way. Is this not part of the reason they removed Chris Boardmans record which still remains unbeaten? Tech played too big a part. It doesn't matter if it's frame design or suite design it's still the same thing
Congratulations.....and another oddness about the UCI and who/what it stands for...(though i understnad the drug policies)...would have thought that anyone should be able to get tested before and after a significant record event like this irrespective of who they are.
the little onionreplied to Global Nomad |3 years ago
0 likes
I think that the testing for things like the biological passport require really quite long term monitoring, years of data. So a few tests in the weeks or months before or after a big event doesn't produce the right kind of data.
Add new comment
5 comments
Not wanting to pour scorn on what is a fantastic achievement , but if a relatively unknown rider - and certainly not world class Time Trial specialist can beat Wiggos record based on technology and pacing then it should mean any more established rider , say Dennis Rohan could absolutely destroy the current world record. But if technology is able to play such a huge role and not just marginally it kind of makes a mockery of the whole record in a way. Is this not part of the reason they removed Chris Boardmans record which still remains unbeaten? Tech played too big a part. It doesn't matter if it's frame design or suite design it's still the same thing
Well done that man! Trebles all round in the Lowden/Bigham household.
It would be interesting to know what his average power was, compared to Wiggins.
Congratulations.....and another oddness about the UCI and who/what it stands for...(though i understnad the drug policies)...would have thought that anyone should be able to get tested before and after a significant record event like this irrespective of who they are.
I think that the testing for things like the biological passport require really quite long term monitoring, years of data. So a few tests in the weeks or months before or after a big event doesn't produce the right kind of data.