Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Driver convicted after reversing into cyclists and calling them “English bastards”

Gareth Jones will be sentenced next month regarding incident near Beaumaris on Anglesey last year

A driver who reversed into a group of cyclists then called them “English bastards” as he drove away has been convicted by a court in Wales of dangerous driving, failure to stop, and racially aggravated harassment by using threatening or abusive words or behaviour.

Gareth Jones. Aged 71, pleaded not guilty at Caernarforn Magistrates’ Court to all three charges, reports Wales Online.

The incident happened on an unclassified road near Beaumaris on Anglesey last summer as the cyclists headed towards Llandegfan.

Clare Bate, prosecuting, said that the bike riders “had to take evasive action to avoid being struck” when Jones overtook them in his Kia Sportage.

The rider leading the group, Valentin Scambraks aked Jones, “What the hell are you doing?”

In response Jones stopped, and told Mr Scambraks: “You're not Welsh. You're an English bastard.”

Jones then drove forward briefly before reversing into the group, with his vehicle’s rear bumper hitting the bike belonging to Mr Scambraks.

One of the riders, Tiernan Ryan, told the court that Jones had said, “Go back to England,” in response to which Mr Scambraks replied: “I'm from the Netherlands, I’m not English’.”

According to Mr Ryan, the motorist “purposefully reversed to try to intimidate us.”

Another rider, Will Holloway, said that “it was an uncomfortable speed to be reversing towards some people.”

Jones, who represented himself, told the court that he had been heading to Ysbyty Gwtynnedd to see his brother and that he had not been speeding on the road, which he had regularly driven along.

He claimed that as he rounded a bend, he encountered a “gang” of riders whom he described as “spread out across the road.”

He also insisted that photos taken at the scene by a couple who were out walking and which had been shared with the cyclists were staged, that the bike had been pushed into his vehicle, and that he had been verbally abused by the cyclists.

Under cross-examination,  he denied having called Mr Scambraks “an English bastard,” conceding that “I might have called him an English snob.”

But he said: “How would you feel if someone called you a Welsh bastard? I would feel aggrieved.

"I'm Welsh. I'm proud to be Welsh and they verbally abused me," he added.

Jones was convicted on all three charges and will be sentenced next month. In the meantime has been handed a temporary driving ban.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

46 comments

Avatar
brooksby replied to Captain Badger | 2 years ago
2 likes

Captain Badger wrote:

mdavidford wrote:

brooksby wrote:

Wearing a dark grey three-piece suit, shirt and tie, black overcoat and a black hat (if it matters, I have a beard and glasses).

Are you a spy?

Nah a hipster. He probably had an avocado under the hat

Avocados are the food of the devil.  Disgusting things.

Anyway, I'm too old to be a hipster, and I've never ridden a fixie...

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
6 likes

brooksby wrote:

.....

Avocados are the food of the devil.  Disgusting things.

Anyway, I'm too old to be a hipster, and I've never ridden a fixie...

That's just what I'd expect a Hipster to say

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Captain Badger | 2 years ago
5 likes

Captain Badger wrote:

mdavidford wrote:

brooksby wrote:

Wearing a dark grey three-piece suit, shirt and tie, black overcoat and a black hat (if it matters, I have a beard and glasses).

Are you a spy?

Nah a hipster. He probably had an avocado under the hat

You've fallen for BOTH his disguises! He was a "rootless cosmopolitan" all along. (Borrowing the Soviet Russian term because sadly highly relevant now).

Avatar
mdavidford replied to chrisonabike | 2 years ago
7 likes

chrisonatrike wrote:

"rootless cosmopolitan"

Presumably that's one that's not made with potato vodka?

Avatar
brooksby replied to mdavidford | 2 years ago
2 likes

mdavidford wrote:

brooksby wrote:

Wearing a dark grey three-piece suit, shirt and tie, black overcoat and a black hat (if it matters, I have a beard and glasses).

Are you a spy?

They weren't dark glasses.

Anyway, I couldn't tell you if I was  3

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
8 likes

brooksby wrote:

......

I can add something to that.

A few years ago (pre-Covid when I dressed smartly to come to the office) I was walking in Bristol city centre on my lunch break.

Wearing a dark grey three-piece suit, shirt and tie, black overcoat and a black hat (if it matters, I have a beard and glasses).

Three man walking past me, then stopped and shouted at me about "F-ing Jews!" (and I mean properly in-yer-face about it).

So, given that I am not Jewish, was that antisemitic harassment?

Wow, what a horrible experience, I'm really sorry to hear that.

My understanding is yes, it is. It was the act and intent of the individual that is the crime, whether or not they got it "right". Philosophically the fact that they got it wrong only further illuminates their ignorance, however, that's probably non-admissible.....

This is from Citizens Advice (see particularly last paragraph)

CAB wrote:

What is ‘race'

Race means being part of a group of people who are identified by their race,colour,

nationality, citizenship, or ethnic or national origins.

If you are part of one of these groups and you experience discrimination, this counts as race discrimination.

Even if you’re not part of one of these groups, it still counts as discrimination if someone discriminates against you because they think you are. This is known as perceived race discrimination.

I presume that this principle is common to all circumstances

I seem to remember that Mikey got abused for being South African (I think he's from Zimbabwe, and is a Dutch national) and the police offered to charge the perp with a racially aggravated offence. In that case Mikey turned the offer down in order to concentrate on the motoring offence.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
7 likes

brooksby wrote:

So, given that I am not Jewish, was that antisemitic harassment?

As far as I understand it, yes (IANAL, though): if I were cycling with my black mates and someone drove a car at us with the intention of harming black people, even if I (a white person) were the only person to be injured they could still be charged with racially motivated assault. It's the motivation of the perpetrator rather than the accuracy of their understanding of whom they are attacking that is the crucial factor, I believe. Willing to stand corrected of course.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Rendel Harris | 2 years ago
2 likes

Rendel Harris wrote:

.....

As far as I understand it, yes (IANAL, though): .....

Sorry, not familiar with that acronym (and there's no way I'm Googling it on a work computer....)

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Captain Badger | 2 years ago
6 likes

Does look dodgy, doesn't it! I Am Not A Lawyer.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Rendel Harris | 2 years ago
2 likes

Rendel Harris wrote:

Does look dodgy, doesn't it! I Am Not A Lawyer.

Aaaah, thanks

Avatar
Inspector Kevin... replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
8 likes

Yes.

The racial element can be committed on someone's perceived race even if it isn't actually true. Some of my colleagues have been racially abused on the assumption that they are from Pakistan. Not actually true, but the demonstration of racial hatred either at the time, immediately before or after the offence wil suffice. 
 

similarly one can be convicted of homophobic aggravation by using homophobic language at the time of an assault which is depressingly common. 

Almost all decisions in relation whether to charge a hate crime are made by the CPS rather than the police and there's a lot of interesting case law about what is and what isn't a "race" or religion. 
 

 

Avatar
wtjs replied to Inspector Kevin Smith SYP | 2 years ago
5 likes

I think there are many of us who are grateful for these views from the other side of the fence, as they arise from an openly declared member of the police who has to be careful what he writes.

Avatar
Tom_77 replied to Captain Badger | 2 years ago
2 likes

Captain Badger wrote:

Rendel Harris wrote:

He was found guilty of racially aggravated harrassment, so I assume reference to nationality counts the same as race under the law?

I understand that the racial identity of the victim does not have to be demonstrated, rather whether the act of harassment was motivated by bias around race as the accused perceives it.

For once Rich below is correct, there are no objective definitions of race, only subjective and cultural meanings and inferences.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/37/section/28

Meaning of "racially or religiously aggravated".

(1)An offence is racially or religiously aggravated for the purposes of sections 29 to 32 below if—

(a)at the time of committing the offence, or immediately before or after doing so, the offender demonstrates towards the victim of the offence hostility based on the victim’s membership (or presumed membership) of a racial or religious group; or

(b)the offence is motivated (wholly or partly) by hostility towards members of a racial or religious group based on their membership of that group.

(2)In subsection (1)(a) above—

    "membership", in relation to a 2racial or religious group, includes association with members of that group;

    "presumed" means presumed by the offender.

(3)It is immaterial for the purposes of paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (1) above whether or not the offender’s hostility is also based, to any extent, 3on any other factor not mentioned in that paragraph.

(4)In this section "racial group" means a group of persons defined by reference to race, colour, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins.

(5)In this section "religious group" means a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or lack of religious belief.

 

Avatar
janusz0 replied to Tom_77 | 2 years ago
2 likes

This and similar quoted definitions fail to tell us what race is:

""racial group" means a group of persons defined by reference to race," or some other characteristics.

Race seems to be a concept that vanishes wheneve you start to examine it. "Hating People and Wanting to Harm them"  seems rather more clear.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to janusz0 | 2 years ago
0 likes
janusz0 wrote:

This and similar quoted definitions fail to tell us what race is:

""racial group" means a group of persons defined by reference to race," or some other characteristics.

Race seems to be a concept that vanishes wheneve you start to examine it. "Hating People and Wanting to Harm them"  seems rather more clear.

You are correct

In context with the offence, there does not need to be an objective definition of race, nor an agreed qualification to belong to one. The crime is from the perspective of the assailant, the harm of course being from the perspective of the victim(s).

In other words you don't need to be correct (or even logical) in your assertions, or the premises that support those assertions, to commit a racially aggravated offence. Which of course (when considered with the distress and harm that these premises and assertions inflict on others) is the entire point.

Avatar
geomannie 531 replied to Mybike | 2 years ago
11 likes

I'm just thinking that my son works in Bangor and sometimes cycles in the area. As he is Scottish I'll tell him to wear tartan and/or kilt next time so it will be clear he is not English (or from the Netherlands). That will keep safe, aye right.

Pages

Latest Comments