Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Mr Loophole applauds police action against "vigilante cyclists" filming law-breaking drivers

Earlier this month a Bristol cyclist received a Notice of Intended Prosecution after holding up a van driver for nine seconds while filming another motorist using their phone behind the wheel

Mr Loophole, real name Nick Freeman, has praised police for "taking action against vigilante cyclists" who film and submit offences by law-breaking drivers.

The lawyer, notorious for earning not guilty verdicts for celebrities charged with driving offences, weighed in after seeing the story, first reported by us and subsequently picked up by national newspapers, involving a Bristol cyclist receiving a Notice of Intended Prosecution after submitting a video of a driver using their phone.

Tom Bosanquet's offence was holding up a van driver for around nine seconds while he filmed another motorist using their phone behind the wheel of their MOT-expired Audi.

Sharing the Daily Mail's take on the incident, Mr Freeman commented: "The Police should be applauded for eventually taking action against vigilante cyclists who frequently ride without reasonable consideration or even dangerously. And who, hitherto, have been immune to the law.

"And why isn't there a cycling awareness course? After all, good enough for motorists."

In the footage, submitted to Avon & Somerset Police, the cyclist "acknowledged the van with a hand gesture and moved on in a matter of seconds".

However, the police force subsequently issued a notice for cycling "without due care and attention, or without reasonable consideration for other people using the road."

Following the brief delay, the held up van driver then drove through a red light, an action Avon & Somerset Police's representative said was due to "his frustration".

According to the Sunday Times, Mr Bosanquet submitted 500 headcam videos to the police last year and a further 200 so far in 2022, with 95 per cent leading to the police taking action.

Despite the notice, the cyclist remained adamant Avon & Somerset Police is "a leading UK force for dealing with constant road danger", and said it was "just a minor issue within a system that generally works well".

It is not the first time the force has turned the tables on a cyclist reporting footage of law-breaking motorists.

Last February, Avon & Somerset Police incorrectly threatened a rider with a fine for 'cycling on the footpath' after they submitted footage of a motorist driving across a pavement.

> "Too ridiculous": Cyclist reports motorist for driving on the pavement... and is threatened with fine for 'cycling on the footpath'

In a statement provided to road.cc, the police force admitted the rider had in fact been cycling on a shared-use path, and that no action would be taken against the cyclist.

However, the statement did warn those filming incidents that all offences seen in footage could result in action, including their own.

"We are grateful for all submissions of potential motoring offences that are uploaded through our website. But people should be aware that if it is identified that the person submitting the footage has also committed an alleged offence, they may also be prosecuted. This is made clear on our website before a submission is made," the statement read.

Loophole lawyer Mr Freeman is no stranger to outspoken comments about cycling in the UK, predicting carnage and more danger following January's Highway Code changes.

In December, the Government confirmed it has "no plans" to force cyclists to wear identification, among other things, following the solicitor's petition scraping over the 10,000-signature threshold for an official response.

> Government confirms it has “no plans” to make cyclists wear identification numbers as it rejects ‘Mr Loophole’ petition

Mr Freeman's petition broke the 10,000-signature barrier within the final 24 hours, having run for six months and repeatedly received news coverage by print and broadcast media, including The Telegraph and BBC Radio 4.

It unsuccessfully campaigned the Government to "require cyclists and e-scooter riders display visible ID, require that cycle lanes be used where available, and introduce a licensing and penalty point system for all cyclists and licensing system for escooter riders."

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

37 comments

Avatar
TriTaxMan replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
3 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:
TriTaxMan wrote:

Do we think Nigel's alter ego is sitting waiting to comment on this story..... but he knows he can't because it would be a dead giveaway as to what name he is using now?

Is that idiot still around? I chose to block their inane ramblings as they added precisely nothing and most likely reduced the collective IQ.

His previous account and all of it's previous posts are gone.... I've got a reasonable suspicion that there is another account created which is him.... based on the same tired rhetoric

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to TriTaxMan | 2 years ago
3 likes
TriTaxMan wrote:

His previous account and all of it's previous posts are gone.... I've got a reasonable suspicion that there is another account created which is him.... based on the same tired rhetoric

I think I saw one that ticked all the wrong boxes. I can't be bothered with seeing that, so I said "No" to that account and have put it on my banned list. It's so obvious when someone is just deliberately trolling - no response is the correct response to them.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to TriTaxMan | 2 years ago
3 likes

Well his newest one posted on the cycling protest thread last night. However as it was such an obvious attempt you do wonder if he has taken a leaf out of DonnieManbaby book on distraction, ie hiding under a different account for now. 

Edit: Quackeroo. Although Noto could be, again like originally Nige, I would give benefit of doubt for now.

Avatar
brooksby replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 2 years ago
2 likes

I had thought that 'NOtotheEU' was shaping up as being a Nige sockpuppet...

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
2 likes

People have similar views and philosophies. Doesn't make them the same person. I would wait and interact with the person. If they are Boo, it will show within 100 posts. If not, they might get bored and leave. Political posts will always bring more polarising opinions with people who otherwise get on fine with most other discussions.

Of course signing up to a site mainly devoted to cycling news with such an obvious political name doesn't help. But maybe a Brexit post was the first thing that they commented on (if they are not Boo.)

Avatar
giff77 replied to TriTaxMan | 2 years ago
3 likes

He's been very quiet. I thought he'd been sin binned again. 

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to giff77 | 2 years ago
4 likes

No, he has "voluntarily asked to be removed from this site, including removing all posts etc" just like his "good friend boo" did a few years ago. It is nothing to do with a full banhammer. I'm sure their "good friend" David Quackeroo sympathises and will explain that at some point.

Pages

Latest Comments