An Edinburgh cyclist who filmed another rider coming within a whisker of being knocked off his bike by a left-turning motorist says the shocking footage highlights the need for safe cycling infrastructure in the area of the Scottish capital where the incident happened.
Dr Mark Hartl was riding on West Harbour Road, Granton, when the driver of a black hatchback cut across the cycling in front of him, barely missing the rider who was forced to brake and unclip his left foot.
Dr Hartl told road.cc that he spoke to the other cyclist afterwards. “He was a bit shaken, but unhurt, as he managed to stay on the bike,” he said.
While he was able to note the motorist’s registration plate, he said that since “no-one was hurt or worse, I did not consider reporting it to the police.”
With the footage going viral on Twitter after he posted it to the social network, and the story picked up by local media, Dr Hartl said that he “would rather see the publicity used to expedite the installation of a cycle path along that route.”
Highlighting “the lack of a safe cycle path between the Lower Granton Road cycle path and the Silverknowles Esplanade that leads to Cramond,” he added that “the road surface is very poor, ground up by heavy HGVs and is now since the lockdown becoming more popular with cycling families.”
> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?
Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.
If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.
If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).
Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.
> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling
Add new comment
61 comments
Pretty much how I got hit the one time a driver drove into me. Came up from behind, performed an incomplete overtake and a left hook into me. Bent my front wheel beyond repair, but fortunately didn't injure me.
A difference was I was in the marked cycle lane - which took me across the mouth of the side-road the driver wanted to turn into. That seems like really bad design, I now think, for precisely this reason. Another way in which bad infrastructure is worse than none at all.
In my case it was a hit-and-run - driver took off like a scalded cat immediately after, and I didn't have a camera or get the licence plate. Made me glad I only have a cheap bike, as a replacement wheel didn't cost much.
Will you be posting more now the trolls from last year are gone ?
The car ended up on the wrong side of the road.. anyone coming the other way would have resulted in a nasty collision; that idiot driver should be prosecuted for dangerous driving at a minimum.
When I was 17 I was coming down a slight incline probably at about 20-25 mph when someone overtook then immediately put their brakes on I was so close that I could not slow down as quickly as they did. They then turned left so I had to go left with them and there was hardly any room between their rear passenger door and the kerb. My pedal clipped the kerb I was flung off fortunately just behind the car and my bike was left as I was lying in the road. They stopped and the bloke was shaking more than I was. He had thought he would have more room in front of me before he would slow down then he had thought I would be able to slow down to make up for his cock up and it was only when the bike and myself fell behind him that he realised that I had been in his blind spot on the inside. Scared the living daylights out of me, it had also scared him to the same level that he might killed me. I cycled off to play cricket and had a lovely afternoon as I recall I made a half decent score that day.
Dr Mark Hartl is an eye witness to a victim suffering a near, potentially fatal impact from a (willfully callous) dangerous driver and, in the intrest of public safety, should have a moral duty to report the scrote behind the wheel before they endo up killing a child or any other vulnerable groups.
The victim may be reluctant but needs encouragement to have the incident reported as now that dangerous driver will believe they can continue on their rampage, unabated, as will similar others.
I was hit by a delivery van who left hooked me without slowing or indicating. It was at a junction along a large segregated bike path. Sent me sprawling across to the other side of the road. Got big rash and a shoulder injury that refuses to go away months later. Amazingly, bike not too damaged. Cosmetic damage is almost more annoying, however. Reported it. Policeman called me and said 'I've talked to the driver, he admitted he didnt check or indicate. Look, he's a nice guy, on this occasion he's just cocked up. I can't see any grounds for prosecution. That's for where someone fails to stop, etc.'
'…he's just cocked up. I can't see any grounds for prosecution'
Looks like the police officer cocked up as well <facepalm>
Policeman called me and said 'I've talked to the driver, he admitted he didnt check or indicate. Look, he's a nice guy, on this occasion he's just cocked up. I can't see any grounds for prosecution. That's for where someone fails to stop, etc.'
This is one of their favourite dodges. They tried it with me on the case below (sorry, it has been shown several times)- the story was that he had apologised so there wasn't any point in doing anything else. It was about 4 months later when the documents were collected together for an 'alleged' prosecution. My statement was taken as the pandemic began to bite in the UK. The present date for the court case is still given as June 2021, although it is also stated that there is likely to be a further delay. The offence took place on 30.9.19. They will always try to put you off as the first stage of the dodging. Then they just try everything to slow it down in the hope that you will die or succumb to another more successful close pass, or just lose interest. And I think the original officer did say 'I'm a cyclist myself'!
So the incident happened at the end of September 2019, but you didn't make a witness statement until Feb or March 2020?
Just as well you had video footage to refresh your memory.
So the incident happened at the end of September 2019, but you didn't make a witness statement until Feb or March 2020?
Correct. You have to fight every step of the way with Lancashire Constabulary, against all the dodges and tricks, initially ignoring the report, then trying to forgive the offence on the victim's behalf etc. etc. You get nowhere with LC without persistence, but they're still fighting by giving the prosecution a zero or negative priority etc.
No amount of safe infrastructure is going to prevent complete bellends like that from driving how the hell they like. Get that twat reported, pronto.
Driver needs to be prosecuted. This was an utterly stupid overtake with the driver obviously having no regard for the cyclists, even if he thought they were together and turning left.
Top summary!
Safe cycling infrastructure in the form of dedicated cycling paths is hardly a panacea IMHO. A perfect example in my home city of Coventry (around the Cannon Park area, if you're local) - a dedicated path has been constructed leading from a shared pavement just off the A45. However, this has narrowed the road down to one lane from two and there is no way to either enter or exit the path onto the road; furthermore, the path is a) usually clogged and b) littered with frankly bizarre speed bumps. This leaves anyone merging onto the road with the awkward choice of either sharing a single lane with increasingly irate motor traffic that is unable to overtake (bearing in mind the road is a 30) or riding at snail's pace down an agonising roller coaster path that leads to an equally rubbish shared path. There is good infrastructure and bad infrastructure but sometimes just maintaining roads might go a long way.
I fail to see how any form of cycling infrastructure, apart from a raised flyover, would prevent this sort of incident, even protected lanes can't have the protection extend across junctions, so any idiot driver that MGIF will continue to drive like this.
Needs reporting to the police so this driver can be prosecuted.
If you are raising it for awareness then I suggest Dr Hartl should be calling for a tougher stance with law breaking drivers, as I suspect they will only get a warning letter or a training course.
Needs reporting to the police so this driver can be prosecuted
I agree- always report if you have the video. Driver is guilty, but he wouldn't be prosecutd in Lancashire. The report would just be ignored, but you have to follow-up with a complaint- and when the police come up with a really stupid argument to justify their 'no further action' you have to follow that up too! Persistence is the only way with the police, who will dodge, duck and dive to avoid taking action.
Agree - I think, in my experience, it has been easier and far convenient for local councils to devise one form of cycling infrastructure, no matter how poorly thought out, constructed, disconnected from safe entry or exit points or any other cycling routes, than to maintain a strong and decisive stance on cyclists' safety on general roads where a large number of us end up anyway.
I'd prosecute this any day of the week.
And it definitely wouldn't be suitable for a letter or training course.
When we submit a TOR the officers opinion is noted as to what the action taken should be (for this one it would definitely be a summons - I'd like to see someone try and explain that overtake in court).
Hang on, does this mean road.cc group think has penetrated the Police force and is taking over ?!
Dream on ...
its the internet. Inspector Kevin may or may not be an ex or serving policeofficer
Yes, but we usually take someone at their word unless they're saying things that don't add up or seem unlikely enough to throw things into doubt.
It seems to me that nicmason will agree that Inspector Kevin is a real policeman if they agree with him; if they disagree with him then they're clearly no true policeman
I disagree
Well, I disagree right back atcha.
So there
If you have a look at @SheffNW_NPT on Twitter or Facebook you may be unfortunate enough to see a photo of me and some videos of close passes that we have posted. There's also a video of me talking about op close pass somewhere on Twitter floating about.
of course that wouldn't prove that that is me, I could be impersonating a police officer which would then get me in more trouble than it's worth I would think but who knows these days?
I will await the complaint of me impersonating me to be submitted to the police - only way to prove it - but then again - this conspiracy could go all the way to the top!
Well said sir. All we need now is for you to be put in charge of footage submitted by cylists nation wide and we'd be on our way towards active travel becoming a reality.
No thanks, I've got enough on just with Sheffield.
Change is coming - this being the police though it is sometimes like pushing treacle uphill
Cycling infrastructure is always welcome and I believe it will get more people cycling but there will never be enough infrastucture to go every where we need to go and at some point nearly every cyclist will need to use a road. If cycling is going to become a real alternative form of transport, with all it's benefits, then the roads will need to be made safe to use. One way of doing this is to make sure that motorists like this one are educated and, if the behaviour persists, then punished (severely). If we don't report then this won't happen. It may not happen anyway without the support of the police but that's out of our control. If we report at least we will know we have done our bit.
What appals me about this and many other NMOTDs is that, once a mistake has been made, motorists feel its more important to keep going, and sometimes even accelerate, than to behave reponsibly and slow down or change direction for the saftey of a cyclist.
I know that road very well. It's actually where I learned to drive, a long time ago and no that wasn't me in the car!
Yes, Police Scotland should be sent the footage. Given their record, they may not take action, but they should get it all the same.
A point worth noting is that the road is generally a decent one for cyclists as it's not busy. But you do have to keep an eye out for the road surface, which is very poor. There are a few industrial units along the route, so if you cycle along there you do watch out for the occasional mixer truck or tipper truck. But you can divert off the main road bit further on and ride along the promenade.
It's of note that the driver saw fit to overtake, given the poor road surface that means you generally have to trundle along there at low speed to avoid damage to your vehicle. It's a classic case of a driver not thinking ahead, and probably not looking after their vehicle that well either. I bet the suspension bushes will be knackered if that's the way the person drives.
Pages