Tony Pearce, a former chairman of Trowbridge Town Council, has criticised the installation of a new £480,000 cycleway and footpath scheme in the town, describing the plans as a “vanity project, worthy of a bearded, sandal-wearing, nut-munching, eco-mentalist.”
The work on the Hilperton Road will replace a temporary cycle lane that was installed during the pandemic with a longer, wider, segregated path for cyclists and pedestrians. Signal-controlled toucan crossings will be installed as part of the plans, and road surfacing works will also take place.
The project, which Wiltshire Council says will be mostly funded by housing developer contributions, was given the green light after a public consultation which took place in December 2020 to determine the level of support for making permanent the temporary cycling and pedestrian measures introduced during the pandemic.
Of the 1,724 responses received during the consultation, 534 specifically commented on the Hilperton Road scheme, with 67 percent of those stating their support for permanent cycling infrastructure in the area.
> Ex-cabinet minister Liam Fox protests against planned seafront bike lane funded by government money
But Tony Pearce, a former chair of the council’s environmental committee, says there has been no attempt by the council to consult residents who live on the road or to “take a census” of bike and pedestrian traffic to “justify the need” for the project.
Referring to the 357 people who voted in favour of the scheme during the public consultation, Pearce asked the Wiltshire Times: “What is Wiltshire Council doing spending £480,000 to satisfy the needs of less than one per cent of the town’s population?”
Pearce also criticised delays to the road works – which the council says are down to a lack of availability of resources and current low temperatures – and claimed that increasing the width of the cycle lane and installing new traffic lights would hinder the response time of emergency vehicles on the road.
“The whole episode smacks of a decision of someone at officer level at Wiltshire Council seeking to carry through a vanity project, worthy of a bearded, sandal-wearing, nut- munching, eco-mentalist,” the former councillor said.
“The [council’s] lack of openness is worthy of a Stalin or even the more recent Chinese paranoia about any inquiry into the Wuhan laboratory. This should surprise no one, however, as Wiltshire Council has what is known as ‘previous form’.”
> Cycle lane on one of UK’s ‘most beautiful’ streets set to be removed
Responding to Pearce’s criticism, Wiltshire Council’s Cabinet Member for Transport, Mark McClelland, said that the emergency services were statutory consultees throughout the planning process and that the carriageway (which will be reduced to a minimum of six metres at its narrowest point) aligns with design guidance on road widths and is suitable for the passage of large vehicles.
“The new walking and cycling facility on Hilperton Road in Trowbridge will help to make it easier for people to leave their cars at home for those shorter journeys, improve safety for all cyclists and pedestrians who use that route, and improve the route to the town centre and cycle network connections,” says McClelland, who dismissed claims that the scheme is a ‘vanity project’.
“It will help our residents to live healthier lives, reduce the number of vehicles on our roads, and lower carbon emissions and improve air quality, which will be particularly beneficial, easier, and safer for parents and children travelling by foot, bike or scooter to the schools in the area.”
Add new comment
9 comments
Trowbridge is my local town and I've been contributing to the 'debate' on the road improvements in the local paper.
Unfortunately, it's the usual anti-cycling bingo comments for the most part, but there are one or two enlightened souls trying to correct the unsubstantiated bias (poodlefaker, I mean you - keep it up 😀).
(I also work for Wiltshire Council as well, but don't tell anybody 😉)!
Well, Tony, I'll see your “vanity project, worthy of a bearded, sandal-wearing, nut-munching, eco-mentalist”
and note that you're on an "ego trip, worthy of a long-retired*, ill-informed, dull-headed, blinkered, dinosaur without the wit to see the needs of the future generations, with whom you're unlikely to be around long enough to share the harm of the infrastructure you would like to see perpetuated"
(* can't find any mention of him in Trowbridge Town Council minutes for Full Council since 2015; happy to be shown something.)
It doesn't state this in the item, but surely Nutter Pearce must be a Tory? I don't know Trowbridge, but it sounds like it should be Nuremberg am Biss (I had to look that river up).
He can't possibly be a Tory. If he was he would surely have read his leaders preface to Gear Change. If he's choosing to ignore that it would surely imply a massive failure of leadership. Oh, hold on......
Do they do that when they are building new roads? Or massive railway infrastructure projects, for that matter? I thought they just did it.
Of course they do for those other projects. And when the ROI doesn't stack up, they invent some other cost "benefit" like reducing driver stress so it magically becomes viable.
I don't know why it's even news. A person formerly in a role is just a citizen whose opinion is no more or less important than anyone else's. The "old man yells at cloud" meme comes to mind. His world is changing and he doesn't like it. I say "so what?"
“The whole episode smacks of a decision of someone at officer level at Wiltshire Council seeking to carry through a vanity project, worthy of a bearded, sandal-wearing, nut- munching, eco-mentalist,” the former councillor said.
It's becomming increasingly difficult to tell satire from genuine comment, and if this had appeared on a comedy site, I'd have laughed quietly, contemplated the brilliance of whoever had written that, and moved on. The fact that it was seriously said by someone who used to be a former chair of the council’s environmental committee, fills me with concern and dread. How can someone with even a passing interest in the environment condemn this well-supported, sensible and good for the environment scheme?
A lot of the usual anti-cycling rhetoric on the paper's website, but also much supporting cycling.
If he's worried it's only used by 1-2% of the population, he could really help by getting on a bike and riding the hell out of this new facility.
He's retired. You should we give 2 f*cks for his opinion?