A parish council in Cheshire that put up a sign urging cyclists to stay away to avoid spreading coronavirus has taken it down after reading the comments about it on an article published here on road.cc yesterday (Saturday).
In an email sent to road.cc, Little Bollington Parish Council said:
We have read the comments on road.cc website and accept that we got it wrong. The signs in Little Bollington have now been removed. We as a community welcome anyone who wishes to visit or pass through our village. We would ask that everyone ensures they respect social distancing. We want everyone to be safe during these difficult times, villagers and visitors alike.
This article was updated at 2220 hours on 19 April 2020. The original article, published at 1527 hours on 18 April 2020, appears in full below. More on this on our live blog tomorrow.
A parish council in Cheshire has put up signs instructing cyclists to “stay in your local area” because of the coronavirus. Fully embracing misinformation, the sign then states that “infringements will be prosecuted.”
We’ve had any number of reports of overzealous community policing of cyclists in recent weeks. The latest comes from Little Bollington near Dunham Massey in Cheshire.
A road.cc reader told us they’d had a chat with the folks putting up the sign, telling them they were driving a wedge between people and that none of what is on the sign is enforceable.
“They were very angry about being challenged,” they said.
Current lockdown guidelines are that you can exercise outside. So long as you ride alone or with members of your household, cycling is very much permitted.
With regards to staying local, it’s worth pointing out that Crown Prosecution Service guidance states that it is lawful to drive somewhere to go for a walk, just so long as you spend longer exercising than driving.
Being as cycling is a form of exercise as well as a form of travel, you're surely on even safer ground.
Here’s our guide for how to be a responsible cyclist during the coronavirus pandemic.
There have been similar reports from up and down the country. (Our favourite sign is still the “Cyclists, stop panting viruses through our village” one from earlier in the week.)
The BBC reports that some residents of Bradwell in the Hope Valley are taking issue with people riding there from Sheffield, arguing they "pose a threat" to residents.
Iain Greenhalgh said: "We're living out in the Peak District, and the thing that's become apparent in this lockdown is all the groups that use it – hill walkers, trail riders, rock climbers – have stopped.
"But cyclists aren't compromising what they're doing for the health of everyone else. If you appear in the villages of the Hope Valley wearing a Sheffield cycling club shirt, you've travelled 12 miles to get here."
He added: "People travelling in from [Sheffield], with one of the highest infection rates in the country, to a rural area, poses a threat."
Responding to the comments, a spokesperson from Sheffield-based Sharrow Cycling Club said the Hope Valley was "local to our members" and that riders were "complying entirely with government guidelines on social distancing" and not riding in groups.
"We just believe many people are using the lockdown as an excuse to air their long-held grievances against cyclists, which in our case we believe to be unwarranted and unfair."
How far should cyclists ride?
Cycling UK’s head of campaigns, Duncan Dollimore, said: “Working out how long we can exercise for is something of a balancing act, and we all need to strike that balance depending on the context. We should ask ourselves what is reasonable, based on where we live, where we’re seeking to exercise, how many people are likely to be there, and what time of day we are venturing outside.
“On the one hand, we are all being encouraged to go out once a day for some exercise, for the good of our physical and mental health and well-being. On the other, we are being urged to avoid unnecessary proximity to or contact with other people. We all need to use good judgement in how to get exercise in ways that minimise unnecessary travel, crowds and possible pressures on the emergency services. Think about what's reasonable.
“Cycling UK advice is to go out for long enough to keep yourself in good shape physically and emotionally but avoid doing more than this. Use common sense when planning your route. If you have a mechanical mishap that you can’t fix yourself and you’re miles from home, you may struggle to get back without asking someone else to undertake an additional journey that could have been avoided if you’d planned a circular route close to home.”
Add new comment
120 comments
If people wish to see just how powerful local Parish councils can be, I suggest you watch a quick episode of "The vicar of Dibley", I particularly recommend the first ever episode, as it's hard hitting documentary style investigation unearths the local corruption too.
"Oh no no no no no ... err, yes!"
Little Bollington is 14 miles from me. I think I'll plan my next ride to go through there.
Anybody else coming? Staying 2m away from each other of course 😀
As pointed out the signs actually say you should not stand 2 m away!!
Also they need planning permission for them.
Well done for playing straight in to the cycle-haters hands.
Proof - on a cycling website - that cyclists are intentionally breaking the law.
Which bit of "exercise only with members of your household" didn't you get?
But they're not breaking the law. That's kind of the point...
I think it was the invitation to ride as a group that was the law breaking thought crime (not that I for one second think the invitation was literal).
Oh, OK...
The invitation was to ride separated by 2m. Doesn't matter if you're alone, 2 of you or 2,000 so long as you're exercising and 2m apart. You could argue 2m is a bit close if you're huffing and puffing, but that's inexpert interpretation. The law is 2m
There is no law that say it has to be 2m
There are regs about staying at home and activities that fall under reasonable excuse. Under exercise it does say 'either alone or with other members of their household'. I think you would stuggle to demonstrate it was not a group ride and hence fail the 'reasonable excuse' test
It's all academic as the orginal comment was a joke.
Utter fucktards.
Oh well done, clap, clap, clap. I don't disagree with your sentiment, but
In a last-ditch bid for some kind of ammunition with which to return fire, you provided Bollington Parish Meeting with - well one bullet - but that's all they needed.
The only way we're going to win at this is by being the better man - consistently.
Signs have been taken down. Rode through there this morning.
I think we know why !
Exactly what "infringements" are they expecting to prosecute?
"If your CCTV captures images beyond your property boundary, such as your neighbours’ property or public streets and footpaths, then your use of the system is subject to the data protection laws."
https://ico.org.uk/your-data-matters/domestic-cctv-systems-guidance-for-...
Private video surveillance that covers public spaces is subject to GDPR. I wonder whether they comply. One aspect of GDPR is that the purposes for which data is collected must be lawful. I doubt that the prosecution of the non-existant crime of cycling is a lawful purpose.
Since by all appearances this is their purpose then I suspect that their enterprise is in breach of the law.
Perhaps some local cyclists could start making subject access requests, and take it from there:
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-t...
Here in the French Pyrenees the lock down is much harder. I've just paid a 135e fine for cycling to my local supermarket on my Wilier wearing cycling clothes, which the gendarme took exception to, even tho' it was legitimate under the rules. I could have argued the toss but frankly it's easier to pay and forget it. Luckily I live on a 10%hill and so an practice hill repeats!
So I went to the garage today and "accidentally" jumped on my CX bike rather than the roadbike attached to the turbo, and so found myself going on a local* ride for local people through Little Bollington.
There were** over half a dozen of these signs within a half mile stretch from the junction of Park Lane with the A56 (pictured) through to the footbridge over the Bolington and another at the entrance to Brick-kiln Lane where it meets Woodhouse Lane (adjacent to the gates to Dunham Massey NT).
Footnotes:
* I live approx. 5 miles away
** they were aattached with screws and my multi-tool accidentally fell into the screw-heads and twisted around in ant-clockwise manner on 4 of the signs
.
That ones defo illegal, its on a restricted byway, the only way to prevent access to those is with a tro. Putting up this sign is an offence under section 132 (1) of the 1980 Highways Act
CCTV could be of some use then.
The rest were on/adjacent to public highways. They were all illegal.
The rest were on/adjacent to public highways. They were all illegal.
Perhaps you should contact the parish council and ask them for costings of putting up those signs, then follow that up with a Freedom of Information request on CCTV locations and demand to see the ffotage they have of you. That should keep them busy for a while
http://askyourcouncil.uk/understanding-your-council/freedom-of-informati...
You are assuming this was done by the pc.
It was.
clerk [at] littlebollington.org
has anyone called up on them (it's a parish meeting, not a parish Council) to clarify their position on this?
You realise you were on CCTV? The L. Bollington neighbourhood watch alliance have now marked your card in order to preserve the greater good.
https://images.app.goo.gl/C23UVvwnAdkhPRCq8
most unfortunate
Then what happened?
Well the signs fell off, unfortunately. Tempting as it was to destroy or remove them at that point, I just left them nearby. Didn't want to commit criminal damage or theft.
Pages