A cycle lane on a road through a park in Edinburgh is regularly being blocked by drivers parking there – with the vehicles’ owners then getting out and riding static bikes as part of open-air fitness classes they are attending, claims the person who took the above photographs.
Twitter user Dave McCraw, who says the issue highlights the lack of safe cycling provision in the city, posted pictures of cars parked in the cycle lane plus a fitness class with participants pedalling on static bikes.
“We're struggling to reduce soaring traffic volumes in Edinburgh,” he wrote.
“Something that doesn't help is making it legal to park over cycle lanes to do stationary bike riding in the park.”
Others found the whole spectacle rather bizarre.
Situated in Marchmont in the south of the Scottish capital, Melville Drive runs along the southern edge of The Meadows and the northern side of Bruntsfield Links.
A number of companies run fitness classes on The Meadows including Be Military Fit and Fitness trainers operating on the Meadows include Punk Fitness and Be Military Fit.
Fitness instructors operating in Edinburgh’s parks and other greenspaces are required to have permission from the council to hold classes there.
City of Edinburgh Council – now controlled by a minority Labour administration with the support of the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats – says that registration is required to enable it to better manage such facilities.
Cycle lanes are covered by Rule 140 of the Highway Code, which governs the use of so-called “mandator” cycle lanes, separated from the main carriageway by a solid white lane, and “advisory” cycle lanes, which have a broken white line.
Rule 140 says:
You must not drive or park in a cycle lane marked by a solid white line during its times of operation. Do not drive or park in a cycle lane marked by a broken white line unless it is unavoidable.
Local restrictions on parking and waiting also apply – in this case a single yellow line, with Mr McCraw pointing out in a response to a comment on his original post that the issue was not so much people parking where they are allowed to, but rather that it highlights the inadequacy of much of the cycling infrastructure in the city.
Add new comment
38 comments
Very common understanding there - "but it's legal to park - what's the problem?"
very common "as a cyclist myself...." (ie I once rode a Raleigh Grifter when I was 11) response to justify their car focused dumb-assery too
To be fair, there is an argument that the council, by painting a single yellow line with defined hours of operation, have implied that outwith those times it is perfectly acceptable to park there. It shouldn't absolve drivers of all responsibility, but (as the originally tweeter highlights) I do think the focus ought to be the fact that the council (at some point in the past) made that decision.
I should have left it with Dave Maccraw's point - "No, I'm moaning that we've built cycle lanes that people can park on."
An alternative to this situation is to make the cycle lane mandatory and position the parking spaces away from the kerb adjacent to the cycle lane so that they only consume the space allotted for all vehicles including motor vehicles for the times when parking is permitted. It creates other problems but would fix this problem.
Fundamentally though, cycle lanes where parking of motor vehicles is permitted are rubbish.
Edinburgh has a few of these but I'm often worried about being doored when riding through.
The one I use most is just up from a parking area carved out of the pavement, the cycle lane going past. As it's outside a takeaway, there's lots of double parking to block the cycle lane anyway.
If you build it... Bastard drivers will come and park in it.
I wonder if there has been a useful test case to define necessary use of optional cycle lanes... given our local council claim that motorists can use them any time they feel like it, which includes when there is no other traffic around, but preferably without a cyclist in it. As they do nothing to enforce permanent lanes, it is hardly surprising.
I'm not up on the law but no consideration of this is complete without mentioning the legal fudge for even "mandatory" ones here:
https://www.cyclinguk.org/blog/underhand-law-change-undermines-mandatory-cycle-lanes
There's a bit of digging (scroll down) here which says that they're not absolutely legally meaningless - although for all practical purposes I'd suggest so.
https://ukcyclerules.wordpress.com/2011/03/10/do-cycle-lanes-have-any-legal-significance/
Pages