Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

South London school bans knives, guns, drugs and … bicycles

Councillor seeking urgent meeting with principal says “We cannot have bicycles on the same prohibited list as knives, porn and ketamine”

A Wandsworth councillor has requested an urgent meeting with the principal of a school in the south London borough after it emerged that pupils are banned from cycling there, with bicycles featuring on a list of prohibited items that includes drugs, knives and pornographic material.

Twitter user Aigars Gedroics, the parent of a student at Ashcroft Technology Academy in Wandsworth – whose board of trustees is chaired by the former Conservative Party treasurer Lord Ashcroft – revealed the ban in reply to a tweet yesterday evening.

He subsequently tweeted a screengrab from the Academy Rules in which “Bicycles” appears in a list of prohibited items that are “not allowed in student’s possession while in uniform or whilst under the control of the academy.”

The rules also require that uniform is to be worn at all times, including while travelling to and from the academy, and provide an explanation of why bicycles are banned, stating: “Bicycles are not permitted because the Executive Board considers the traffic to be too heavy and the roads around the Academy too difficult to negotiate for young people and therefore pose an increased risk to health and safety.”

The school, in East Putney, lies close to the junction of the A205 South Circular Road and the A3 West Hill, with its main entrance located just off that road,

But Mr Gedroics highlighted on Twitter that West Hill does have cycle lanes running in both directions, and it is worth noting that the Academy Rules also require students to observe the Highway Code while travelling to and from the site.

Councillor Jo Rigby, active travel and transport speaker for the Labour group on the Conservative-controlled Wandsworth Council, said that she has written to the borough, the academy and London’s cycling and walking commissioner Will Norman to request an urgent meeting about the situation.

She told road.cc: “We cannot have bicycles on the same prohibited list as knives, porn and ketamine. It is the goal of the London Mayor and Wandsworth Borough Council that our children should be able to walk and cycle to school safely.

“I have requested a meeting between Mr Douglas Mitchell, Ashcroft's principal, Wandsworth Council transport officers, TfL and both London and Wandsworth Cycling Campaign representatives to work together to find solutions to enabling safe cycling.”

She also said that the ban had been verified to her “by a former pupil, now aged 21, who states that he cycled to the school but locked his bike some streets away so as not to be seen by leadership.”

Councillor Rigby added: “It's a tech specialist secondary school. Cars are allowed in to inspire engineers but not bikes,” highlighting a tweet from the academy regarding a visit from McLaren Automotive.

As Twitter user Always Last pointed out, local education authorities in England have a statutory duty to promote sustainable travel to and from schools.

While the latest version of the Academy Rules is dated 2016/17, the effective ban on students cycling goes back more than a decade earlier, with Councillor Rigby tracking down a report regarding redevelopment of the school site, which at the time went by the name ADT College, laid before Wandsworth Council’s Planning Applications Committee in September 2005.

The report made reference to “30 cycle parking spaces (for staff and post-16 students) separated from the existing vehicular entrance to the north on Portinscale Road which will be retained,”

The report goes on to state:

The applicant in support of the application has indicated that the landscape design provides an area for 100 cycle stands, of which 30 will be provided during the proposed works. The school has a “no cycling” policy for pupils for health & safety reasons. Their students travel from a wide area and the transport surveys demonstrated that a significant majority use public transport. There are members of staff who cycle and the school has made a commitment to allowing post-16 students to cycle, but the school is not currently willing to allow the 11-16 year olds to cycle.

But the report also noted that in response to a consultation on the application, Transport for London had said it was

Surprised that no provision is made for students to cycle to college, recommends this be reviewed considering the proximity to London Cycle Network on West Hill including benefits associated with cycling. Additional cycling facilities should be provided to aid safe passage of students.

The position regarding cycle parking of the engineering services department of the London Borough of Wandsworth – which has been under Conservative control since 1978 – was also summarised in the report:

Cycle parking provision is restricted to staff with only 11 spaces proposed. Pupils should be encouraged to cycle to the College, following suitable training which can be arranged through the Council. Secure cycle parking provision should be increased to `146 spaces to allow for this.

Following publication of our article, we were contacted by the council, who pointed out that due to its academy status, the school made decisions independently of the council, and that the main routes to reach the school are on roads controlled by TfL, rather than the borough. In a statement, a council spokesman said:

 

Wandsworth Council declared a climate emergency in 2019 and since then has been working with residents, businesses and institutions such as schools in implementing measures that are beneficial to the environment across the borough.

For example we run cycle training sessions within schools to encourage active travel and our school streets scheme has been a very positive measure, where we have closed roads to traffic at the start and end of the school day to create pedestrian and cycle only zones. We have a large number of our schools now involved in this scheme – you can read more about it here.

In terms of the decision taken by Ashcroft Technology Academy, it is worth pointing out that because of its academy status Ashcroft’s decisions are made independently of Wandsworth Council. But more importantly the two main roads used to get to the school – Upper Richmond Road and West Hill – are owned and run by Tfl and so any changes to the infrastructure of these roads are down to them.

In the meantime Wandsworth Council will speak to the school to see if it can help at all on this matter and continue to implement our policies, where we have jurisdiction and control, to meet our climate change commitments.

Meanwhile, across London in Dagenham …

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

60 comments

Avatar
Allen Key replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
0 likes
hirsute wrote:

No, it means that they only need to be aware of rule 239.

Interesting... For travelling to and from school, I'd have thought the Green Cross Code (rule 7) would be useful.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Allen Key | 3 years ago
1 like

That would require children to walk which as we know is far too dangerous.

Avatar
randonneur replied to Jenova20 | 3 years ago
3 likes

How is it legal or otherwise to dictate how you travel to school.  The students should have a mass cycle-in day, parking bikes on the school fence.

If they are sent home so be it, send the whole class home.

 

Avatar
Hirsute replied to randonneur | 3 years ago
0 likes

I think it is ultra vires but as the badger points out, you have to go to a lot of effort to challenge it at the possible risk to your child.

Avatar
Sriracha | 3 years ago
26 likes

Knives are dangerous, so they ban knives.
Drugs are dangerous, so they ban drugs.
Cigarettes are dangerous, so they ban cigarettes.
Fireworks are dangerous, so they ban fireworks.
Cars are dangerous, so they ban bicycles.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Sriracha | 3 years ago
2 likes
Sriracha wrote:

Knives are dangerous, so they ban knives. Drugs are dangerous, so they ban drugs. Cigarettes are dangerous, so they ban cigarettes. Fireworks are dangerous, so they ban fireworks. Cars are dangerous, so they ban bicycles.

Magnificent! mark my words S, one day your name will be spoken in the same breath as that of Niemöller.

Avatar
Jenova20 replied to Captain Badger | 3 years ago
3 likes
Captain Badger wrote:
Sriracha wrote:

Knives are dangerous, so they ban knives. Drugs are dangerous, so they ban drugs. Cigarettes are dangerous, so they ban cigarettes. Fireworks are dangerous, so they ban fireworks. Cars are dangerous, so they ban bicycles.

Magnificent! mark my words S, one day your name will be spoken in the same breath as that of Niemöller.

That Sriracha is great, but he's no Martin Niemöller...Did i win?

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Jenova20 | 3 years ago
2 likes
Jenova20 wrote:

....

That Sriracha is great, but he's no Martin Niemöller...Did i win?

Yea verily, the prophecy is fulfilled! (just wasn't expecting it to be quite so soon...)

Avatar
brooksby | 3 years ago
4 likes

Can a school actually govern how someone chooses to travel to school (or be transported to school)?  Could they write in their Rules, "Thou shalt only be transported by an Audi"?

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
4 likes
brooksby wrote:

Can a school actually govern how someone chooses to travel to school (or be transported to school)?  Could they write in their Rules, "Thou shalt only be transported by an Audi"?

Yes and no. Specifically, they can't say you must not ride a bike on the way to school. Well, they can say it, but it wouldn't stand up in court. However as we all know just saying it in itself makes it a rule (even if unjust, or without any legal framework to support it) which would need to be challenged to make it not a rule. Most kids haven't got teh agency and resources to challenge school rules, even if they want to, and in fact neither have most parents due to being time-poor, and having conflicting priorities - eg want to challenge this, versus don't want to disrupt child's education.

They can prohibit people from bringing their bikes onto school premises, and they don't have to provide storage, which is a de facto prohibition in itself.

I wonder if any of the teachers ride?

 

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Captain Badger | 3 years ago
5 likes

In the twitter feeds above, I found one where someone had dug up an old planning application where the school claimed they were going to ensure more people came by bike !

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
1 like
hirsute wrote:

In the twitter feeds above, I found one where someone had dug up an old planning application where the school claimed they were going to ensure more people came by bike !

Yuck, nasty. I wonder if the council spent money on the cycle route partly to support that claim.

What I don't get is the ideological motivation to actually prevent people without access to cars from getting to school easily. It's a pretty vindictive stance take.

Avatar
TheBillder replied to Captain Badger | 3 years ago
1 like
Captain Badger wrote:

Yuck, nasty. I wonder if the council spent money on the cycle route partly to support that claim.

What I don't get is the ideological motivation to actually prevent people without access to cars from getting to school easily. It's a pretty vindictive stance take.

I don't get the ideological motivation behind the entire academy thing. On one hand you have a Secretary of State for Education wanting more control, more Latin etc, but on the other, the entire system is rigged towards pushing schools out of democratically elected (if not always very competent) council control and into the clutches of self-serving egoists with delusions of grandeur, religion, or both. That these academy trusts have zero experience of running an education service doesn't seem to matter, but political connections perhaps do.

Does this happen so that central government can wring its hands when things go wrong, and it turns out that a sports academy run by a cult isn't in fact producing the citizens of tomorrow's sunny uplands?

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to TheBillder | 3 years ago
1 like
TheBillder wrote:
Captain Badger wrote:

Yuck, nasty. I wonder if the council spent money on the cycle route partly to support that claim.

What I don't get is the ideological motivation to actually prevent people without access to cars from getting to school easily. It's a pretty vindictive stance take.

I don't get the ideological motivation behind the entire academy thing. On one hand you have a Secretary of State for Education wanting more control, more Latin etc, but on the other, the entire system is rigged towards pushing schools out of democratically elected (if not always very competent) council control and into the clutches of self-serving egoists with delusions of grandeur, religion, or both. That these academy trusts have zero experience of running an education service doesn't seem to matter, but political connections perhaps do.

Does this happen so that central government can wring its hands when things go wrong, and it turns out that a sports academy run by a cult isn't in fact producing the citizens of tomorrow's sunny uplands?

I think you've got a firm grasp on the ideology. No one said it had to make sense

Avatar
andystow replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
6 likes
brooksby wrote:

Can a school actually govern how someone chooses to travel to school (or be transported to school)?  

Of course they can. As long as they don't ban arriving by car and being dropped off within ten feet of the door. That would be an enormous imposition.

Avatar
Jem PT replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
2 likes
brooksby wrote:

Can a school actually govern how someone chooses to travel to school (or be transported to school)?  Could they write in their Rules, "Thou shalt only be transported by an Audi"?

No need to make it a rule - this is near Putney after all, so I'm sure 95% of the precious little ones are ferried to school in an Audi. Just think of the extra lie-in the kids could have if they cycled to school, rather than spend all that time in traffic jams every morning?

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 3 years ago
6 likes

I know the area well. I pass that way regularly. Yes, the main road passing by the school is very busy. But the school authorities seem to have overlooked the basic fact that there is decent cycling provision in the form of a cycle lane on the pavement. The decision is nuts basically. All it'll do is encourage more parents to drop their kids off by car and make the traffic worse.

Avatar
wycombewheeler | 3 years ago
10 likes

OK for children to walk to school on the same routes despite KSIs PER MILE being similar for cycling and walking. Injury rates for cycling might be higher per hour, but for covering the same distance they are not worse than walking.

It's a shame that educators who should be equiping the young to think rationally and logically based on evidence are unable to do so themselves when setting school policies.

Avatar
Captain Badger | 3 years ago
12 likes

So the roads are dangerous but it's fine to shuttle Tarquin and Gwendolin to and from school using the source of that danger.

Of course.....

It's worthwhile pointing out that pedestrians are also at risk from cars, with a significant proportion of deaths occurring on the pavement, and a disproportionate amount of this violence being visited on children. Is walking on the banned list too?

Avatar
Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
10 likes

I know West Hill well, it's one of my routes towards Richmond Park and the Surrey hills. That cycle lane could not be safer, and there are plenty of quiet roads leading onto it. I'd be happy for a child to cycle there, absolutely astonished that the school should take that attitude.

Avatar
Daveyraveygravey | 3 years ago
2 likes

I notice mobile phones are on the banned list.  How many kids actually don't have their phones on them 24/7? 

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to Daveyraveygravey | 3 years ago
2 likes
Daveyraveygravey wrote:

I notice mobile phones are on the banned list.  How many kids actually don't have their phones on them 24/7? 

I doubt many could hide bikes in their bags though.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to wycombewheeler | 3 years ago
3 likes
wycombewheeler wrote:

.....

I doubt many could hide bikes in their bags though.

If you can hide a phone in your bag, you can hide a bike....

Avatar
Jenova20 replied to Captain Badger | 3 years ago
5 likes
Captain Badger wrote:
wycombewheeler wrote:

.....

I doubt many could hide bikes in their bags though.

If you can hide a phone in your bag, you can hide a bike....

* Read in Dom Jolly Voice*

HELLO! NO, I'M AT SCHOOL! NAH, IT'S FUCKING CRAP! NO BIKES ALLOWED!

Avatar
brooksby replied to Jenova20 | 3 years ago
1 like
Jenova20 wrote:

* Read in Dom Jolly Voice*

HELLO! NO, I'M AT SCHOOL! NAH, IT'S FUCKING CRAP! NO BIKES ALLOWED!

Ah...  That particular Dom Joly sketch never gets old  4

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Jenova20 | 3 years ago
1 like
Jenova20 wrote:

* Read in Dom Jolly Voice*

HELLO! NO, I'M AT SCHOOL! NAH, IT'S FUCKING CRAP! NO BIKES ALLOWED!

Avatar
Jenova20 replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
0 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:
Jenova20 wrote:

* Read in Dom Jolly Voice*

HELLO! NO, I'M AT SCHOOL! NAH, IT'S FUCKING CRAP! NO BIKES ALLOWED!

Friends of yours? There is a resemblance...

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to Jenova20 | 3 years ago
0 likes
Jenova20 wrote:
hawkinspeter wrote:
Jenova20 wrote:

* Read in Dom Jolly Voice*

HELLO! NO, I'M AT SCHOOL! NAH, IT'S FUCKING CRAP! NO BIKES ALLOWED!

Friends of yours? There is a resemblance...

Nah, you must be thinking of red fox: https://youtu.be/t_vULnoDRfo?t=20

Avatar
Hirsute | 3 years ago
8 likes

To be fair, it does ban any object that could be used a weapon. Easy enough with quick links to get that chain off or remove a wheel and bludgeon someone.

 

All sounds ultra vires to me - how can a school determine how you get there or what you wear on the way.

"Academy Rules also require students to observe the Highway Code while travelling to and from the site."

Does that extend to driving parents ?

What would the headlines be if it said due to heavy traffic and pollution, children are banned from coming by car due to the damaging environmental effects?

Avatar
brooksby replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
3 likes
hirsute wrote:

To be fair, it does ban any object that could be used a weapon. Easy enough with quick links to get that chain off or remove a wheel and bludgeon someone.

"Never bring a scooter to a bicycle fight" (or something like that)

Pages

Latest Comments