Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Two cyclists ordered to pay £500 for riding bike through town centre, as councillor says local authority “will not simply look the other way” and that cyclists “have been rightly punished”

The hefty fines came after the cyclists either refused to pay or appealed the penalties, in the town where one cyclist was previously fined £1,150 for breaching the PSPO and the council was accused of targeting the “old and slow”

Cyclists in Grimsby have once again fallen foul of the town’s controversial Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) – which has previously seen the council accused of targeting the “old and slow” – after two were fined over £500 for riding their bikes through the town centre, prompting a councillor to claim that the cyclists were “rightly punished” and that the local authority “will not simply look the other way” when it comes to people breaching the PSPO.

This latest episode in Grimsby’s ongoing “zero-tolerance” approach to people riding bikes in pedestrian areas in the town saw two cyclists, 31-year-old Joshua Purton and 46-year-old Lee Tear, handed Fixed Penalty Notices of £100 for breaching the PSPO by cycling on Victoria Street on 4 July 2023 and 1 August 2023 respectively, Grimsby Live reports.

Purton, however, failed to pay the FPN, leading to his prosecution, while Tear appealed the decision. The 46-year-old’s appeal was not upheld and he was reminded to pay the fine, which remained unpaid. Neither man attended court, with both ordered to pay £534.04 in total, consisting of a £220 fine, £88 victim services surcharge, and £226.04 in costs.

Responding to the recent rulings and hefty fines, Conservative councillor Ron Shepherd, North East Lincolnshire Council’s portfolio holder for ‘safer and stronger communities’ said: “These PSPOs are there for a reason. Not because we want to put them in place or to cause a nuisance, but to ensure the safety of the borough.

“These people have not followed the rules and for that they have been rightly punished. Others need to be made aware that we will not simply look the other way, those breaking these PSPOs will face repercussions.”

Grimsby town centre fine (North East Lincolnshire Council)

> Cyclist ordered to pay over £1,000 for riding bike in town centre – after council accused of targeting “old and slow”

Those repercussions have certainly been felt over the past few years, with 85 people fined in 2023 alone for cycling in “prohibited areas”, in what Shepherd described as a “great result for our enforcement teams”.

Last summer, the council made headlines after a female cyclist was ordered to pay £1,150 in fines and costs after being caught breaching the PSPO, which was introduced in 2019 and has seen more than 1,000 fixed-penalty notices, the majority of which have been for cycling on Victoria Street South and walking dogs along the main beach.

In December, the council said it has “escalated” and “intensified” its “war on cycling menaces” by implementing a complete ban on riding a bike in pedestrianised zones, as part of a wider crackdown on anti-social behaviour, with these latest hefty penalties following another £500 fine for cyclist Andrew Billingham earlier this year, who appealed his FPN after claiming he had dismounted before entering Victoria Street.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the council and its enforcement officers have come in for criticism during the five years the PSPO has been in place, locals accusing council officers of targeting “old and slow” cyclists after a pensioner was fined for riding through the town in 2022, while ignoring youths “racing up and down”.

Barrie Enderby, who was 82 at the time, told the council to “stick it up your arse” after being fined £100 for breaching the order.

“I’ve been riding my bike around here for 40 years and have never once been fined,” he said at the time. “I’m more annoyed about it because my biking is what keeps me going. I’ve never had a problem when out on my bike before.

“I’ve seen all sorts going on around town in the past and they chose to give me a ticket. If he had just asked me not to ride my bike I would have understood and stopped out of respect, but I never got the chance.”

> Campaigners call for clearer signage to reduce “risk of confrontation” with pedestrians, after council insists disabled cyclists won’t be fined under controversial town centre cycling ban

July 2023 also saw the aforementioned incident resulting in 31-year-old Lauren Cullum being ordered to pay more than £1,100 in fines.

Some questioned the fairness of the punishment especially as, in contrast, in the same week at Grimsby Magistrates’ Court Paul Berry pleaded guilty to driving at 50mph on a 40mph road. He was disqualified from driving for seven days, fined £60, and ordered to pay a victim services surcharge of £16.

North East Lincolnshire Council introduced the PSPO in 2019 and last year announced it had been extended until 2025. Local authorities are able to introduce such measures under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime, and Policing Act of 2014 in order to tackle issues of a particular nuisance or problem in an area that is detrimental to the local community’s quality of life.

After obtaining a PhD, lecturing, and hosting a history podcast at Queen’s University Belfast, Ryan joined road.cc in December 2021 and since then has kept the site’s readers and listeners informed and enthralled (well at least occasionally) on news, the live blog, and the road.cc Podcast. After boarding a wrong bus at the world championships and ruining a good pair of jeans at the cyclocross, he now serves as road.cc’s senior news writer. Before his foray into cycling journalism, he wallowed in the equally pitiless world of academia, where he wrote a book about Victorian politics and droned on about cycling and bikes to classes of bored students (while taking every chance he could get to talk about cycling in print or on the radio). He can be found riding his bike very slowly around the narrow, scenic country lanes of Co. Down.

Add new comment

46 comments

Avatar
Secret_squirrel replied to David J lanterne rouge | 6 months ago
3 likes

David J lanterne rouge wrote:

Pointless warbling

Alternative view.  Lets stay on topic and not get on our individual soapboxes about an utterly unrelated matter.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to David J lanterne rouge | 6 months ago
7 likes

David J lanterne rouge wrote:

These fines are vastly excessive,but we are own worst enemies. I cycle several thousand miles a year,and also drive. In the last 40 years cyclists have learned to ignore red lights and other rules as though they do not apply to us.

No "we" haven't, because there is no "we". Some cyclists break the law, the majority (including me) don't. Collectivising all cyclists and saying that "we" ignore the law is as foolish as claiming that all football fans are hooligans or every driver is a drunk driver.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to Rendel Harris | 6 months ago
1 like

Well, they say "in the last 40 years" - so perhaps something changed in ... 1984?

Bike Brother is watching you?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to chrisonabike | 6 months ago
2 likes

chrisonabike wrote:

Well, they say "in the last 40 years" - so perhaps something changed in ... 1984?

Bike Brother is watching you?

I think it was Norman Tebbit's "on your bike" statement from 1981.

Not that he said that, he said:

Norman Tebbit wrote:

I grew up in the '30s with an unemployed father. He didn't riot. He got on his bike and looked for work, and he kept looking till he found it.

Avatar
polainm replied to chrisonabike | 5 months ago
0 likes

IDS "under his eye".

Avatar
polainm replied to Rendel Harris | 5 months ago
0 likes

I do often break the HWC laws when cycling, because my life preservation trumps poorly considered laws written by a driving culture. 

"Daddy was killed cycling legally..." is a not uncommon remark in carmageddon UK. 

Being fined for breaking these laws is a health and safety tax on cyclists. 

If a few pedestrians could also understand the HWC, this would help, and GET OFF THEIR BLOODY PHONES.

Avatar
brooksby replied to David J lanterne rouge | 6 months ago
4 likes

David J lanterne rouge wrote:

In the last 40 years cyclists have learned to ignore red lights and other rules as though they do not apply to us.

Wait until you see the stats on motorists ignoring red lights and other rules ('don't stop on a cross-hatched yellow junction box', anyone?).

A lot of societal norms have collapsed in the last forty years.

I blame Thatcher  3

Avatar
Stephankernow replied to David J lanterne rouge | 6 months ago
0 likes

I agree , Respect red 4 times since Christmas im at lights on red and fellow cyclists sail by me twice being abusive because I'd stopped.
Its not political in my opinion its about obeying the law and safety.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Stephankernow | 6 months ago
3 likes

Stephankernow wrote:

I agree , Respect red 4 times since Christmas im at lights on red and fellow cyclists sail by me twice being abusive because I'd stopped. Its not political in my opinion its about obeying the law and safety.

So on average you've seen a cyclist run a red less than once a month? Not exactly an epidemic round your way then, is it?

Avatar
eburtthebike | 6 months ago
4 likes

"Conservative councillor Ron Shepherd, North East Lincolnshire Council’s portfolio holder for ‘safer and stronger communities’ said: “These PSPOs are there for a reason."

Indeed, the reason being that he's a tory and hates cyclists.

There must be a way to challenge the validity of these PSPOs, which can criminalise otherwise perfectly legal behaviour.  If so many people have been fined for this offence and no-one seems to have been injured/killed, perhaps it demonstrates that the ban and fines are excessive.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 6 months ago
11 likes

Quote:

“These people have not followed the rules and for that they have been rightly punished.

Careful what you wish for tory boy.

Avatar
GMBasix | 6 months ago
11 likes

Great! Now do drivers!

Cllr Shepherd wrote:

These PSPOs are there for a reason. Not because we want to put them in place or to cause a nuisance, but to ensure the safety of the borough.

No. PSPOs are there because they are a way of imposing tokenist regulation with a very low bar of evidence to justify them.

Avatar
ROOTminus1 | 6 months ago
6 likes

Cllr Ron Shepherd's days are surely numbered. Cons only held 3 of their 11 council seats up for election last week.

Avatar
Dnnnnnn | 6 months ago
6 likes

Sounds like most of the penalty is for failure to pay the FPN, not for the cycling.

Avatar
Mr Hoopdriver replied to Dnnnnnn | 6 months ago
2 likes

Typically, for dodging a £2.00 ticket on the railway, fine will be £50.00 + prosecution costs of £hundreds.  Same for private hire drivers picking up a customer who hasn't pre-booked.

The prosecutions are brought by the railway company or the council not the CPS and they don't have the volume of work to justify a large prosecution department so the cases are prosecuted by an agent who charges £100s per hour.

TV licences are also the same.  Quite often the costs outweigh the fines several times.

Avatar
brooksby replied to Mr Hoopdriver | 6 months ago
2 likes

Signs have started turning up on First buses in Bristol saying that inspectors are going to start checking tickets etc.  It says if you don't have a valid ticket then you'll be charged their "standard fare of £50".  Which just seems weird, since no ticket they sell is £50…  I presume they don't want to say, "You'll be fined" because they'll get all the Freemen of the Land types saying they didn't consent or something.

Pages

Latest Comments