At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
No they don't, not for cycling time trials anyway. You're confusing what you think should be the law with what is actually the law. By the way, if...
Where's the motor, joking
Thanks Dave!
The Michelin Power Gravel Adventure might fit your requirements, or the Vittoria Terreno Zero ("tubeless ready" but no reason you couldn't run it...
Council showing 'utter disregard' for people against Liveable Neighbourhood scheme:...
Better in some places and worse in others. There's still pletny of gridlock going on. I want them to bring back the rickety flyover by Temple Meads...
Disgraceful sentence that reinforces the contempt towards cycling. I hope both the driver and judge suffer a serious illness.
" in what appears to be two random, completely unprovoked attacks."...
You could get away with much less turning area required if you go for a Kakeya set...
It's only for a minute