- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Cross country mountain bikes
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
11 comments
Well I got the answer at last - my 705 recorded 2843m of climb - a bit more than BLH so not sure why
Having looked up the actual base to peak elevation it'ss the equivalent of almost four times up Snowdon - so well done to all and in excess of 9000ft on the day
Superb event, excellent atmosphere, good riding company out there and just about the perfect weather - even made time to look at the scenery at some points
Back for more next year
Well my garmin 500 said today's ride was 2411m of ascending.
Really pushed myself and finished in 5:34:47, pooped now, but an awesome day
I've compared map my run to sporttracks and bikeroutetoaster. Generally, map my run is 20-30% less than bikeroutetoaster and sporttracks is more (after applying elevation correction)
I've always (across 4devices) found GPS tracks hugely overestimate.
I use bikeroutetoaster as it's in the middle -you could try that
6500 is a good day out - 10,000 is a 'will be taking it easy the following two days' for sure. . Perhaps we should ask Geraint to take a quick spin round it and give us a definitive answer. Seems the least he could do. Charting where the big climbs are should at least make pacing the last third possible.
Sweet, always like to be quoted, maybe I am useful. 'In 92 miles you climb a total of 6483ft and there's even a timed section up Horseshoe Pass if you want to really test yourself.' on Bike Radar, strange the Etape website is not very forthcoming on the elevation. 6483ft = 1976m so no consistency there.
As Bikeboy76 pointed out on a thread the other day:
http://www.mapmyride.com/gb/ellesmere-eng/etape-cymru-route-132461979
That has it as 1679m! (5,500ft)
It's amazing how there can be so many contrasting values!
Ah well, I'm just going to have to pace it and push it in the last 30km if I'm still feeling fresh
Thanks all - 9-10,000 feet looks like the place to get my head.
Did the Dartmoor Classic this year into what seemed a permanent headwind and rain, which seemed to add another 1000 ft to the whole thing so fingers crossed for an Indian Summer in September
My Garmin file from last year reckons 2,438m..looking at the elevation profile there are steep climbs at around 35k, 80k and 105k and there's quite a draggy climb at about 55k which ramps up a bit.
File attached.
It's a good day out; I did it with a compact and running an 11-25 and there's really nothing to get too worried about. I'd be doing again if I wasn't in the Pyrenees the week before
Etape Cymru Garmin elevation file.PNG
I've done it both years.it'll be around 9,500 ft climbing.you'll spend most of the day out of the saddle
This looks like it? http://app.strava.com/activities/21390512#382599107
It was 3000m last year, if that's any help?