- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Broken bike (CC licensed image by garryknight, www.flickr.com)Partner of cyclist killed in Manchester nearly run over as she lay flowers at the scene
The partner of a cyclist killed in Manchester last year by a speeding car on a slip road leading to Mancunian Way says she was nearly run over while laying flowers at the scene. Gemma Gooden is urging Manchester City Council to improve signage at the location, and plans to sue the driver involved.
Earlier this month, a coroner’s inquest heard that Jaye Bloomfield, aged 37, died from serious head and chest injuries sustained when she was hit by a car as she made her way across a pedestrian crossing, straddling her bike, in August last year.
Her death happened a fortnight before the first anniversary of her and Ms Gooden’s civil partnership, reports the Manchester Evening News.
Police say the vehicle was travelling at between 41 and 49 miles an hour in a 30 mile an hour zone, but the driver, Michael Campbell, escaped prosecution because of the absence of correct signage notifying motorists of the speed limit.
Coroner Fiona Borrill said she would be writing to Manchester City Council to ask when the correct signage would be put in place, and Ms Gooden is now urging the local authority to take action.
“I don’t want other families to go through what happened to Jaye,” she said.
“I went to leave flowers there last week and I stepped out on a green light and a car came through really fast. It was a near-miss, I was nearly run over.
“I don’t understand why the council hasn’t put better signs in there yet - you would have thought somebody dying would be enough.”
She revealed that she plans to bring a civil action against the motorist with the help of her solicitor, Carol Jackson of the law firm Slater & Gordon.
Ms Gooden issued an appeal for witnesses, including pedestrians in the vicinity when the crash happened, saying: “I hope they will come forward. I want to fight for justice for Jaye.
“I miss Jaye every day. I still cycle but it’s just not the same without Jaye. She was the person I wanted to spend my life with and grow old with and that’s been taken away from me.
A spokesman for Manchester City Council told the Manchester Evening News that 30mph signs are positioned at the beginning of the slip road, as well as a 50 mph sign at its junction with the motorway.
He added that the council was working alongside Greater Manchester Police to improve the 30mph signage, and that works will be undertaken “in the next few weeks.”
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- wtjs 1 hour 30 min ago
You didn't mention The Scottish Dodge, whereby if, by witchcraft, you manage to force your HD video upon the reluctant Scottish Police and they...
- mdavidford 2 hours 7 min ago
Not particularly sure that follows.
- mdavidford 2 hours 26 min ago
There's one that's always lurking outside our house at night.
- mdavidford 2 hours 44 min ago
When these were designed in to the new development near us the excuse was 'well if we didn't it would be impossible to get a rubbish truck in to...
- Rendel Harris 3 hours 42 min ago
I should get onto the Guinness Book of Records people then, as they have the world record slowest heart rate for a healthy person down as 26bpm,...
- Hirsute 6 hours 6 min ago
I made a complaint within an hour of the story being published. I have zero faith that they will amend anything....
- chrisonabike 6 hours 27 min ago
TBF I think that's before she saw the light and got on her bike. Not so great if her views have been informed by Mr. Briggs though.
- Saracen888 7 hours 7 min ago
That's a great price. Just bear in mind Import duty and handling charges will be applied pre delivery.
- Griff500 8 hours 29 min ago
Yep, I appreciate your problem. I wouldn't buy a bike without at least sitting on the same frame configuration on a trainer in the shop, something...
- Secret_squirrel 9 hours 43 min ago
One less thing to clutter up your jersey pockets no? Though difficult to retrieve in a hurry...
Add new comment
23 comments
Mind-boggling that anyone that bad can be behind the wheel of a car!
This is the memorial for Jaye Bloomfield:
https://twitter.com/JaiRedman/status/514735943325331457/photo/1
https://twitter.com/DavidOatesPhoto/status/514818335461343233/photo/1
Smashed up by some pillock driving a car, and still Manchester City Council and Greater Manchester Police refuse to accept responsibility and do something about it.
Shameful.
Derby Road in Liverpool is a 30mph dual carriageway for most if it's length with a 40mph mile long section at it's northern end before returning to 30mph - pretty nonsensical in itself. Having being stopped for doing 41mph in the 30mph section I was reminded by the Police officer that no signage is not an excuse as 'a road with street lights has to be treated as having a 30mph limit unless signs state otherwise.'
A local road has a National Speed limit applies sign followed by a 30 followed by a 40 all within 500 yards if a T junction. No wonder courts are confused and reckless speeders getting off.
Unless, apparently, you drive so horribly that you kill someone?
Where was that copper when this went to court, I wonder?
CPS fails again.
Surely if you kill a cyclist, the main point is the detail 'YOU KILLED A CYCLIST', does this imply if you killed a cyclist whilst driving at 29 in a 30 its ok? Unless the cyclist did something stupid or there was a bizarre incident, you are at fault!
I would like to take a large % of judges out to a field, bury them and start again with some people who understand the value of human life.
It must be terrible for the partner or family of any tragedy like this to cope knowing the system is so flawed.
I had a wander round the area some time ago on Streetview (images dated a few months prior to the collision IIRC, so a good chance of being representative), after reading the original news reports. As far as I could see there was no need for 30mph signs to be there anyway: you arrive at the junction from 30mph zones and the sign for the change in limit is placed at the far end of the slip road, way beyond where Jaye was killed.
There's something very fishy about this one.
There are a lot of crossings in and out of the area that don't have traffic lights at all!
When I visited the Manchester council website they state that there is no money for adding pedestrian crossings, instead they are using the money for road surfacing.
This isn't abut cyclists so much, but about public safety. It's now got to the point where the council values the suspension of cars above the lives of pedestrians.
All this signage nonsense is just a whitewash exercise anyway. I know the slip road well, you'd have to be blind or completely incompetent not to see someone on the crossing, even doing 49mph. Nothing to do with the speed, all to do with a crap driver. The problem apart from that is all about the weak and ill-equipped justice system that has yet again completely failed to take a dangerous driver off the road and has left the relatives heartbroken, disillusioned and alone.
The fact that the signs have not been improved since a tragic death shows how little the authorities care about road safety. Surely it is the council that should be sued?
Maybe then they would give a s**t?
I offered a contrary opinion to that of lambasting the police on the strength of a couple of quotes in a very short newspaper report.
I assume the reason news items have the option to comment is so that we can do just that?
Putting aside my cynical nature, I'd be interested to see what kind of 'civil action' this may be. Doesn't sound like a private prosecution so we're not talking 'justice' here we're talking money. I suspect this may be the the partner considering claiming 'damages' from the driver.
I'll be surprised if it actually happens.
A civil action wouldn't be a private prosecution by definition. And it's one that someone who has lost their legal partner because of someone else's alleged negligence is perfectly entitled to bring, and the insinuation it's all about "money" is a bit tasteless. And why would you be "surprised" if it happens? Negligence cases come before the civil courts all the time.
Well maybe I don't follow the news enough and as civil partner I suppose there's the opportunity to claim for wrongful death however, the only redress can be financial one, so if it's not about money what can it be? If discussing a news item based on given details is 'tasteless' then indeed I'm guilty.
As to whether, bearing in mind the circumstances of the accident i.e. apparent lack of witnesses, result of the police investigation, incorrect signage I'll still be surprised if it goes ahead. That is purely personal speculation on what I have read.
You were doing rather a lot of 'personal speculation' on the last story that was posted about this incident, much of it ill-informed.
A failure of justice.
Once the justice system has failed to provide justice a private prosecution becomes the only available course of action. I know both the location of the incident and the partner. Having met her I am 100% sure her motivation is entirely about justice. Money simply becomes the only vehicle available to dispatch it.
There are plenty of people in Manchester who will be very happy to support her in her efforts to make sure it does actually happen.
@ Cranky Acid
Maybe the Cyclists Defence Fund could help.
There are some total c**ts driving on the roads. Take care every one.
I think this post sums it up......End of.
One heading OK now, not the other.
"as" rather than "us"?
It's sad that civil actions have to be taken because the justice system is useless.
In this case the justice system doesn't seem to have taken in to consideration that a person shouldn't be driving so fast that can't avoid an accident regardless of what the speed limit is.
I hope Ms Gooden gets some justice.
Totally agree. It doesnt apply just to cyclists - a neighbour of mine was involved in an accident for which her insurance company paid out. She was about to pull out of a driveway on a blind corner on country lane (in her car). Note - she was not in the road. There is a big mirror on the corner to give the driver pulling out visibility in both directions. A car was coming around the corner, and hit a third car coming the other way. Apparently the totally legitimate excuse was 'I saw her in the mirror so I had to pull across the road to avoid hitting her'.
The fact he was travelling to fast to stop as he came up to a well signposted, dangerous corner seemed to be considered to be totally irrelevant. So someone sitting in a driveway, not even on the road, was considered somehow to blame.
It seems to me the insurance companies have quite a bit of responsibility here to contest claims where the perpetrator is patently not complying with the Highway Code.