John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.
He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.
Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.
John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.
He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.
Add new comment
15 comments
However, the Lib Dems in Northampton have posted some crap through my door, a newsletter type 'progress' sheet, and they are focusing on the 'menacing scandal' of pavement cycling.
They seemingly then go on to fail to recognise any link in this perverse activity by going on to report the state of local roads and huge pot holes, local concerns about increased traffic due to a new 54 home development and small supermarket and the redevelopment of a former Royal Mail sorting office into a huge school and community facility that between them will generate huge increases in traffic volume.
If only there was a cheap, easily accessible, fitness enhancing non road smashing transport alternative for these bright political sparks to get behind eh?!
Politicians = Blind leading the blind meets dumb and dumber.
I could actually cry.
Curious to learn about the conclusions of the RDRF conference.
Personally, I believe throwing money at the problem (policing) without addressing its roots is less efficient. 3 approaches stand out: 1. A long term policy of getting more people on bikes and 2. As reported elsewhere, making insurance companies part of the solution 3. Obliging car manufacturers to (retro)fit alcohol sniffers in cars. 2.+3. could be implemented at once, but displeases the car manufacturing lobby...
The trend goes back much, much further than the last five years. You can take it right back twenty five years, when the hit and run rate in the capital was about 7%.
The most disturbing aspect, is that the trend now appears to be accelerating.
This issue will be one of many discussed tomorrow (November 1st) at our conference
http://rdrf.org.uk/2014/09/22/conference-on-road-danger-reduction-and-en...
Unfortunately, the conference is now fully booked. there will be a report on www.rdrf.org.uk
You do wonder when you read stats like this how come so many people appear to believe that it's only when we're on bikes that people become a problem for Joe Public, but on the other hand when we're in cars, people are virtuous and responsible members of society!
Its not exactly that though, is it? They don't believe that "when we're in cars, people are virtuous and responsible members of society", but the ones in cars are "just like us" (TM) and not "other". Therefore, they're alright.
Its about time car drivers were forced to take a test, have insurance, pay road tax and be registered somehow.
That would stop this sort of bad behaviour.
Thats right. Otherwise, how will we identify and punish all the lawbreakers out there. Hmm ... Hang on a minute ...
The first two London cyclist fatalities in 2013 were car hit and runs [I keep a spreadsheet]. This driver attitude is widespread. In a friendly way I point out to drivers an illegal turn and risk of fine/points and their response is often "I'll do what I want". Coupled with the belief the police "persecute" motorists and speeding is victimless and not really a crime, the gulf is very wide.
London also has the highest percentage of uninsured drivers in the UK.
Nearly a third of motorists (29%) admitted to driving without insurance in the capital, according to a survey from MoneySupermarket ealier this year.
Naaaa south Manchester init.
its wall to wall red light jumping uninsured uncle took your test drivers round here.
Its sad to say, but I don't think this is just London, I think its nationwide that there is a certain lawlessness when it comes to the roads. I liken the roads when there are no police around to the way school children behave when the teacher leaves the room (i.e. chaos) the minute they hear the teacher coming they all behave impeccably. The sooner insurance companies make it a condition of insurance to install black boxes and dash cameras (with random reviews of driver behaviour) the better.
Seeing as the police won't do anything about bad drivers, I'd like to think that the insurance companies will do something by hiking up the premiums of anyone they think is a risk. Just wish there was a way to report poor driving directly to the insurors.
I think these stats need to be highlighted more widely. They are worrying. I'm curious how many of the incidents involved a driver being on the phone.
Finally a politician seeing the bigger picture. We need more money spent on policing the infrastructure we already have.
And the bottom line stat. How many of those 4154 hit & run was the driver identified?