Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Bristol law firm sees 200% rise in injured cyclist enquiries

Clarke Willmott says government must do more to prevent crashes

A Bristol law firm says it has received a 200% increase in enquiries from injured cyclists in the last year.

Clarke Willmott solicitors also asked the Department for Transport for cycle crash statistics surrounding its offices that show a 10% increase in cyclists killed or seriously injured in Bath, Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire.

The firm reiterates criticism from the European Transport Safety Council that the government is dropping its guard on road safety and points out the UK's road safety is deteriorating while other European countries, including Croatia, Slovenia, Finland and Greece, enjoy safer roads.

Stephen Trump, a partner in Clarke Willmott’s Serious Injury Team, said more needs to be done but isn't clear about what, exactly, other than campaigning for road safety and "in some cases providing safety equipment to cyclists".

He said: "The number of cases we have seen has increased over the last year. We are dealing with cases where cyclists have suffered life-changing injuries in accidents where someone else is at least partly at fault.

"We strongly believe that many of the cases we deal with could have been avoided or prevented and that injuries and deaths on our roads can be reduced in the future. This would mean others will not have to endure the tragedy of losing a loved one, or sustaining life-changing injuries as our clients have.

"We have worked with groups across the country, campaigning for improved road safety and in some cases providing safety equipment to cyclists. Following the publication of these statistics, we believe the best way to improve the UK’s safety record for cyclists and all road users is for Government to ensure this is prioritised and has the resources it needs."

Trump, who is a member of the Spinal Injury Association, Headway and a panel member of the Limbless Association, makes no mention of presumed liability.

Led by Brenda Mitchell, Scottish legal firm, Cycle Law Scotland, founded a campaign to introduce presumed liability, arguing a lack of legislation is hampering efforts to encourage active travel, and pointing out Britain is one of only five EU countries without this law. There is a "clear and strong association between presumed liability and higher levels of safe walking and cycling" it says.

Cycling in Bristol doubled in the ten years to 2011, to 7.6% of journeys to work, with 57% of under 40s travelling to work by other means than the car. 

Laura Laker is a freelance journalist with more than a decade’s experience covering cycling, walking and wheeling (and other means of transport). Beginning her career with road.cc, Laura has also written for national and specialist titles of all stripes. One part of the popular Streets Ahead podcast, she sometimes appears as a talking head on TV and radio, and in real life at conferences and festivals. She is also the author of Potholes and Pavements: a Bumpy Ride on Britain’s National Cycle Network.

Add new comment

6 comments

Avatar
alansmurphy | 9 years ago
0 likes

Agree with brooksby, merely enter the word 'cycle' into Facebook and you'll spend the remaining years inundated with ambulance chasing adverts.

Also they do not mention either the volumes - has it raised from 2 to 6 - nor the success rate nor other areas of support people are (or are not) receiving...

Avatar
brooksby | 9 years ago
0 likes

Isn't it possible that a 200% increase in enquiries from injured cyclists says more about people's increasing tendency to go for litigation ("Just sue the b**tards!") and less to do with an increasing number of actual accidents?

That said, I'm not sure how much I'd trust anything that came from a firm of accident claim lawyers whose spokesman was a Headway member...  29

Avatar
RedfishUK replied to brooksby | 9 years ago
0 likes
brooksby wrote:

Isn't it possible that a 200% increase in enquiries from injured cyclists says more about people's increasing tendency to go for litigation ("Just sue the b**tards!") and less to do with an increasing number of actual accidents?

After a minor collision, which I insisted the Police attended, mainly due to the complete incompetence of the driver. I was basically encouraged by the attending PC to go down the compensation route, probably as he couldn't really be arsed with the paperwork.
The driver - who has initially been oh so sorry etc, then retracted everything. But the Injury Lawyers (who I wouldn't normally advocate using) did a great job and got me more than enough to mend the bike and hopefully push up the motorists insurance!

Avatar
crikey | 9 years ago
0 likes

Is this an advert for them?

Avatar
ianrobo | 9 years ago
0 likes

"in some cases providing safety equipment to cyclists".

eh ??? what put a cage around the bike ?

Not sure a solicitor with injury claims was less accidents

Avatar
Ush replied to ianrobo | 9 years ago
0 likes
ianrobo wrote:

"in some cases providing safety equipment to cyclists".

eh ??? what put a cage around the bike ?

Not sure a solicitor with injury claims was less accidents

the article wrote:

Trump, who is a member of .... Headway

Headway are a group of helmet compulsionists, so you can be sure that's what he's hinting at. And of course, as the article mentions, no mention of changing the legal structure to provide a serious disincentive to motor operators _before_ the cyclist finds out that the magic hat didn't do any good.

Latest Comments