Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Does the UK spend £10 or £1.50 per head on cycling? Tories and Labour at loggerheads over figures

Commons row leads Labour MP to claim transport minister has 'had the air let out of her tyres'...

Cyclists outside London are receiving as little as £1.50 a head in infrastructure spending, Labour has alleged, as a row rumbles on about low funding for two wheeled transport.

On Friday we reported how the Government said it will continue to support sustainable transport with a new £580m ‘Access’ fund for England which will run until 2019-20. However, the funding equates to little less than £3 per person per year – far below the £10 per person per year level the Prime Minister said he would be aiming for. -

But Shadow transport minister Daniel Zeichner told MPs that cycling "took a big hit" in the recent spending review, leaving little to spend in next year’s cycling and walking investment strategy.

Clare Perry,  Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, told the Commons that this was untrue, and that “the Government continue to encourage more cycling and walking across England.

“We did good work under the last Conservative Government: spending per head rose from £2 in 2010 to £6 now and more than £10 in the cycling ambition cities. On the long-term vision, we have made it clear that we want to make the UK a cycling nation.”

When challenged by Labour MP Ruth Cadbury about the figures, Ms Perry answered: “our view, and hers I think, the investment should be targeted, which is why the cycling ambition cities get more than £10 per head. Her analysis does not include our commitment that every mile of new road built by Highways England must be cycle-proof.”

In April, Prime Minister David Cameron said that the Conservative Party was aiming to increase funding for cycling to £10 per person per year, aiming to double levels of cycling by 2025. While the government is keen to point out that spend per head is currently over £10 in the eight Cycle City Ambition cities and in London, elsewhere it is far below.

Spanning the period from when the Department for Transport (DfT) publishes the long-awaited Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy in spring until 2019-20, the Access Fund works out at £145m per year, so less than £3 per head based on England's population of 53 million at the 2011 Census.

In July it was announced work had commenced on the Cycling and Walking Strategy, which was hailed as an "historic moment". At an event in Newcastle cycling minister, Robert Goodwill, said: "We want everyone to be able to see what we are doing for cyclists and judge for themselves whether it’s working.

"Which is why towards the end of the last parliament we passed a law saying that the Department for Transport will publish a Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy.

"I have instructed my officials to begin work to commence the relevant section of the Infrastructure Act."

The CTC's Sam Jones said: "What we would like to see is that the Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy has teeth, with proper funding of at least £10 per head. There is real concern when all you see is cuts, cuts, cuts from George Osborne."

Add new comment

9 comments

Avatar
Grigor | 8 years ago
2 likes

I'm as concerned about how well the money is spent as I am about how much there is per head. It's frustrating how frequently councils spend money putting random, unlinked, stretches of cycle path on quiet side streets. Can it really be that hard to have switched on cyclists involved in the planning - directing funds where they're needed rather than where schemes are easily implemented.

Avatar
Airzound | 8 years ago
0 likes

Where I ride zero is spent on cycling. It's all a big lie.

Avatar
emishi55 | 8 years ago
0 likes

"Ban cycling, just watch the "accident" numbers go down as well..."

"accident" = collision

 

 

Avatar
StuInNorway | 8 years ago
2 likes

Am I the only one reading this windering how a road is made "cycle proof" and what that entails ?  Transverse mounted cattle grids ?  ( "our commitment that every mile of new road built by Highways England must be cycle-proof.” )  Last I checked if you <something> proof an item you protect it from the <something> . .  . Rain proof = protected from rain.... Bomb proof=Protected from bombs,....  so how does a road become "cycle proof" ??

Avatar
mrmo replied to StuInNorway | 8 years ago
3 likes

StuInNorway wrote:

Am I the only one reading this windering how a road is made "cycle proof" and what that entails ?  Transverse mounted cattle grids ?  ( "our commitment that every mile of new road built by Highways England must be cycle-proof.” )  Last I checked if you <something> proof an item you protect it from the <something> . .  . Rain proof = protected from rain.... Bomb proof=Protected from bombs,....  so how does a road become "cycle proof" ??

 

Ban cycling, just watch the "accident" numbers go down as well...

 

 

Avatar
wycombewheeler replied to StuInNorway | 8 years ago
1 like
StuInNorway wrote:

Am I the only one reading this windering how a road is made "cycle proof" and what that entails ?  Transverse mounted cattle grids ?  ( "our commitment that every mile of new road built by Highways England must be cycle-proof.” )  Last I checked if you <something> proof an item you protect it from the <something> . .  . Rain proof = protected from rain.... Bomb proof=Protected from bombs,....  so how does a road become "cycle proof" ??

Is it where they put those barriers at the entrance that are narrower than handlebars? As seen on cycle paths everywhere.

Avatar
Eric D replied to StuInNorway | 8 years ago
0 likes

StuInNorway wrote:

Am I the only one reading this windering how a road is made "cycle proof" and what that entails ?  Transverse mounted cattle grids ?  ( "our commitment that every mile of new road built by Highways England must be cycle-proof.” )  Last I checked if you <something> proof an item you protect it from the <something> . .  . Rain proof = protected from rain.... Bomb proof=Protected from bombs,....  so how does a road become "cycle proof" ??

Water-proof = impermeable

You shall not pass!

Avatar
HarrogateSpa | 8 years ago
2 likes

Is Clare Perry's statement spin or deceit? £2 - £6 - £10 - oh, fantastic, up, up, and away. Until you realise that that is not a trajectory.

£6 'now' might be correct, including London - thanks to Boris Johnson and no thanks to the government.

£10 is verging on dishonest, because it's saying 'if we only include the places that get the most cycle funding, funnily enough the figure per head comes out higher than if we included everywhere.'

After the spending review by Osborne, CTC calculated that future spending in England, excluding London, is to be £1.39 per head. If it's not dishonest, it's certainly misleading to fail to mention the spending you've announced for next year, simply because it's pathetic, and makes you look bad - and look as though you've betrayed your election promise of £10.

Avatar
LeighNichol | 8 years ago
2 likes

Where I live they're spending £0 per head. There is a cyle lane in the nearest town to me. On a path. Covered in dogshit. Never maintained. Ironically it runs from the centre of town to KFC, McDonalds, Pizza Hut and Frankie and Bennys. Obviously been put there for all the local chavs to bomb along on their mountain bikes to get dinner. I wish I was joking but it literally is the only cycle path in the area. The road it is next to is a 40mph limit, guess how many people stick to it? Unless they're queing to get into KFC etc. of course. So no-one wants to use their bikes on it unless you're confident in (speeding) traffic. I'm just resigned to the fact that I have to risk my life everyday to get into work, or sit in a car. Unless you live in a city or large town, you're on your own. I also realise that because I live in a small village there never will be infrastructure for cycling on the local roads, so what needs to be done is if we can't have cycle lanes (fair enough), then spend our share of the money on educating new drivers and maybe hard-hitting ad campaigns aimed existing drivers being aware of cyclists on the road. Simple. I won't hold my breath with this government though, horrible, backtracking liars.

Latest Comments